lemon1 kinda disheartened him perhaps : (

win CHAMPS!

in the replies it says its legal in NA and pacific.

where is the lie?

bro's acting like pansy is the only caster

when loud was 0-2 at tokyo ya'll were nonexistent

hard to disagree with factual data.

how illegal?

FNATIC have a long way to go.

less goat for 2023? bro was missing at tokyo.

sheesh the stats go crazy ( tokyo, champs, regionals)

thoughts on the economy?

blame riot not emea

go tell him to use phantom

im not being 100% serious im trying to start a discussion is all.

so then what would you suggest, im all ears but paper is not the way i hope.

im not saying everything should be gold

but definitely a majority of it should be

if there's a shortage of gold, we should use the bartering system to trade. that is the only way stability is maintained.

why? Gold is THE Gold Standard.

paper is tooo unreliable, i would rather have it in gold, where the banks cant change its value, printing money is fake,

paper is cheap, they can print money whenever they like. it creates fake value, the only value it has is the value we believe about it
gold is real, gold is hard to come by, therefore its stable, and therefore its best for currency.

true. it snowballs the whole game. , this is also due to the value of rifles and the econmy system

yea they are good but there are countries that are better.

UK is a loud minority imo

/james jani

thoughts on his vids?

Basically, it's all about perspective. Imagine you're on a plane looking down at the city. Everyone below has their own stuff going on – problems, joys, and everything in between. Yet, from up there, it's just a big picture. It's a reminder that we shouldn't get too wrapped up in small issues. Life's bigger than that, and we've got to remember to look at the big picture

bro limit tested for us all. the rules are crap. need to be clear.

there is no line between banter and disrespect, unless you are witty and smart about it. there are some people who just know how to do it, either you have it or you dont, and people who dont have it need to curate and limit test before using it on the real world. imo, Muhammad Ali was the best to do it, and was loved by mostly everyone, he was quick witted and humorous , always ready.

yea it doesnt make it right i agree, but it doesnt make it right to dismiss this tweet rn.

yoooo ascent looks so small in mobile.

its not his responsibilty to document his whole life but i agree it looks bad, dont do things you arent willing back up, but we should cut him some slack as if we haven't made mistakes in our lifetime.

i agree with the comments but for the wrong reasons. all trash talk should be discouraged, not because it hurts a particular group, but it hurts everyone honestly.

Boostio was not being racist btw.

yep i agree he should've , but we dont know if he didn't apologise behind closed doors. don't assume the worst of everyone.

i just had an important epihpany moment based on current affairs.

Hear me out: Accusing someone of racism makes you racist.

Let's think this through. If someone does something bad to you, but they happen to be a different race, and you call it racist, you've just discriminated against them because of their race. You judged their action more harshly because of their skin color, not the severity of the act itself.

An insult is an insult, regardless of who it comes from. If a classmate called me a nasty name, I'd be upset. But if they were the same race as me, I probably wouldn't think much more about it. Just kids being unkind, right? However, if they were a different race, I might immediately get angry and assume racism.

But stop and consider: the insult itself was equally hurtful in both cases. By immediately jumping to "racism" when the other kid is a different race, I've just done the same thing - judged them and their actions differently based on race.

The intent behind an action matters, but we can never truly know another's intent. A hurtful act should be addressed on its own merits, not on assumptions about the motivation. Racism is real, but accusing any conflict between races as racism only breeds more distrust and division. We perpetuate real racism when we apply the term loosely.

If I keep assuming ill intent because of race, I foster racism within myself. If I treat any dispute across racial lines as inherently racist, I fan the flames of racial divides. A Latino kid shoves my Black daughter on the playground. If I instantly yell "Racism!", I teach my daughter that Latinos are inherently racist against her. But if the Latino kid shoves a White kid next, I'd have to concede it wasn't about race. Kids shove. Kids insult. Sometimes they target race because it's an easy short-cut to being cruel. But assume racism by default, and you create an expectation that racial groups should mistrust each other. See every interaction through a racial lens, and that lens can distort reality.

Now, this is not to minimize the very real and very prevalent issue of racism. Racism is deeply ingrained in societies across the world and manifests in various overt and covert ways. But to combat racism effectively, we must understand it and address it correctly. Every insult from someone of another race isn't necessarily rooted in racial prejudice.

In essence, we should treat all insults with the disdain they deserve, irrespective of the racial backgrounds of those involved. Similarly, all crimes should be evaluated based on their severity and not merely the presumed intent behind them.

Let's call out clear acts of racism when we see it, but not apply the term so broadly that it loses meaning. Judge actions by their severity, not assumed intent. If we treat any insult or crime differently based on race - either excusing bad acts from those like us, or assuming the worst about those who look different - we perpetuate racism. A colorblind society has its own problems, but a race-obsessed society magnifies rather than diminishes racism. We must react to all insults equally, address all crimes by their severity, and avoid assumptions about intent based on race. Only by responding to actions directly, not to skin color, do we have hope of moving forward as one people.

no its not normal i agree, but there can be no gray area so there are no double standards. imo, there should be a wide discouragement from csters, fans, and riot themselves against trash talk. teams should be respectful and kind, it has to be black and white for it to work.

respect to buzz, but it doesnt mean anything its just a retweet.

that was a misunderstanding.

so what?

people change, they become better.

a smoker continues to smoke, but advises his son to not smoke, sure its hypocrisy, but it doesn't invalidate his message,

but in this situation, suy has stopped smoking (hopefully) and is still calling people out, it doesn't invalidate his message, and its not a reason to discredit him.

BRO WHAT??? when did he punch zekken and when did he trash talk??

what is this is in reference to, but i agree anyway.

top 5 duelist

1) smith/jinglebell
2) aspas
3) derke
4)demon1
5) KK

i liked that post match interview, bro is just an unserious joker, but confident at the same time.

nah i dont play cod, or any video games.

nah i cant see him retiring, not yet. his brain is not yet fully utilised surely.

ARE YOU OKK????

why is that stuck in my head, what a legendary moment

youtube.com/shorts/tx8mjEsRWzA

the comments are true

still a jett diff tbh

LUL u mean americas and not american right?

wow good aim wins again

been saying...

true agreed.

this guy hates EU talking or trying to win anything lol.