EU doesnt play harbor. how is this NA's fault?
| Flag: | International |
| Registered: | November 10, 2022 |
| Last post: | October 2, 2023 at 10:27 AM |
| Posts: | 3765 |
EU doesnt play harbor. how is this NA's fault?
this person has been terrorising this site with "hiiiii" + all those stupid emojis, and acting like a cotton candy (sweet on the outside but shallow on the inside) and you didnt see that stupid title of this post??
i can tell your face was redder than tomato when you wrote this.
He is making false promises as a form of damage control. If he doesn't deliver, it will look far worse than simply standing by his word.
bro ask GPT arent you people young and tech savvy.
Disk Method: easy
When to Use: For solids that have circular cross-sections and no hole in the middle.
Function Needed: One function f(x) or f(y) to define the curve.
Integral Formula: V = π ∫ from a to b (f(x)^2 dx or (or y)
Washer Method: (basically the outer hole - the inner hole)
When to Use: For solids that have circular cross-sections but have a hole in the middle.
Functions Needed: Two functions f(x) AND g(x) or y equivalent, to define the outer and inner curves.
Integral Formula: . π ∫ a to b f(x)^2 -g(x)^2 dx ( or y)
br people who rant always got good stuff to rant about
the more you go to the gym.. the less you post on this site. W.
fraud?? that guy is a valuable part of the reserve squad. (mainly used as a punching bag by the main team)
Oi, good onya for rockin' up with so much fire to stick up for the players, ya legends. We're listenin', don't ya worry. But, strewth, there's still some dodgy stuff we've gotta sort out, aye. We're on it like a car bonnet, and we're aimin' to come up with somethin' good for the players. We'll give ya the goss when we've sussed it all out. Cheers!
you can literally reply under his thread but you decided to make a whole post
cope (mini will be leaving)
feels easier now that halls is gone. i would imagine the only use for it is to cut off rotations from people trying to go bridge from connector.
also allows for more diversity within controllers and sentinels.
the exalt thing is what i was talking about, yes.
this post is specifically taking offense away from something that could make someone offended.
ur tunnel visioning.
Everyone comes from different backgrounds, which means what we consider "normal" varies from person to person. This difference is often what makes accents amusing to some, rather than an indication of racism.
i mean, all football teams have reserve squads too.
https://twitter.com/chronicleEZ/status/1696665926865736119
its happening.... he got dropped so he streaming
thats surprisng, thanks for the advice.
try this it helped me: https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/classes/calcii/calcii.aspx
also try this: https://www.madasmaths.com/ (its UK but the questions are top tier and his solutions are amazing too)
im telling u, if u use madas maths and wrinse that website out, u will most likely get A* (or US equivalent)
Personally, I think it's a huge deal. Imagine having an army and training against each other, all behind closed doors. Your opponent wouldn't know what you're cooking up, and that's gotta be terrifying. It's the same thing here. The main squad doesn't even need to scrim other teams as much, because they have the reserve team to use as a 'punching bag'. This lets them focus on theory-crafting, limit-testing, and really going all out, without leaking strats in external scrims, in scrims you have to tip toe around as to not show your full capabilities, And let's be real, most scrims are fake and useless since no team wants to show their full potential; just like you(the team).They have the freedom for that, while other teams do not.
But here's the real deal: the reserve team can mimic certain play styles of opponents, which is pure gold for the main team. They get to understand how to counter those styles and even pick up on some hidden intricacies.
In my eyes, this is such an underrated tactic that literally NO top team is doing. This is how you build generational success. You stay ahead of the curve, you predict the meta, you keep evolving. When teams fall off the map in CSGO or Valorant, it's usually not because their mechanics went sour. No, it's because another team cracked their code, not their aim or niche set plays. And that's why you NEED a reserve team—to avoid the stagnation that sinks so many other squads.
edit: TMV talks about this: https://youtu.be/nmeh2al9v1A?si=qL1DNR3De7boswcZ&t=5745
Personally, I think it's a huge deal. Imagine having an army and training against each other, all behind closed doors. Your opponent wouldn't know what you're cooking up, and that's gotta be terrifying. It's the same thing here. The main squad doesn't even need to scrim other teams as much, because they have the reserve team to use as a 'punching bag' they dont need to show anything. This lets them focus on theory-crafting, limit-testing, and really going all out, without leaking strats in external scrims, in scrims you have to tip toe around as to not show your full capabilities, And let's be real, most scrims are fake and useless since no team wants to show their full potential; just like your they don't want to.They have the freedom for that, while other teams do not.
But here's the real deal: the reserve team can mimic certain play styles of opponents, which is pure gold for the main team. They get to understand how to counter those styles and even pick up on some hidden intricacies.
In my eyes, this is such an underrated tactic that literally NO top team is doing. This is how you build generational success. You stay ahead of the curve, you predict the meta, you keep evolving. When teams fall off the map in CSGO or Valorant, it's usually not because their mechanics went sour. No, it's because another team cracked their code, not their aim or niche set plays. And that's why you NEED a reserve team—to avoid the stagnation that sinks so many other squads.
Whether you're using "🥺" to look sweet and sincere or "😼" to look cunning and self-assured, each 'bump' is a glaring signal to the rest of us. It's a breadcrumb trail of your insincerity, each one an invitation to question your motives further. What's the plan here? Are these bumps your way of saying, "Hey, don't forget about me! I'm still here, still cute, and still so very interesting!!!"? If so, it's having the opposite effect. It's making us question, not just who you're pretending to be, but also what you're really up to.
one of the replies in nikos original tweet is crazyyyy
fully agreed, which is why i think there's more at play here imo.
here are reasons why Riot might have decided NOT to allow the players to advance:
Financial Gains: They might believe that the controversy created by not allowing a team to advance could generate media attention and bring in more viewers, thus potentially increasing revenue. Bad news can often be good publicity.
Future Leverage: By setting a harsh precedent now, they could make teams more compliant and fearful in the future. Teams would be less likely to risk contractual or procedural errors, giving the organization more control.
Reduced Risk: Not allowing a team to advance eliminates any potential future headaches that might arise from dealing with a team that has already shown it can have administrative or contractual issues.
Power Play: Demonstrating a willingness to take extreme actions can strengthen their negotiating position with teams, sponsors, and other stakeholders in the future.
Favoritism: If the other two regions are more lucrative or favored for some internal reason, ensuring teams from those regions face less competition could be beneficial for the organization.
Scapegoat Creation: By blaming The Guard or the specific circumstances of this region for the harsh decision, they can deflect any criticism away from organizational policies or decisions that might be less well-received.
Setting Market Value: By demonstrating the significant consequences of not adhering to procedures, the organization can increase the perceived value and prestige of an International League spot, making it more sought-after in the future.
Resource Allocation: Not having a team advance from this region might save on operational costs, such as the resources needed for onboarding a team into the International Leagues. These savings could then be allocated to other, perhaps more profitable, endeavors.
Legal Safety: The organization might feel that by not allowing any room for exceptions, they safeguard themselves against potential legal disputes that could arise from perceived unequal treatment of different teams.
Hidden Agendas: There might be internal political or strategic reasons for wanting to block teams from this specific region from entering the International Leagues that are not publicly disclosed.
The tournament organizers are worried that if they let the individual players from The Guard join a new team after they've already competed under one banner (The Guard), it could set a precedent. That precedent would be that a team could essentially qualify for the International Leagues and then "sell" their spot to another organization by allowing that organization to acquire their players. This is against the rules of the tournament, which aims to keep the competition fair and based on skill, not on who can buy a spot.
From an "attorney's" perspective, one could argue that this explanation might not entirely hold water for several reasons:
Limited Scope: The circumstances surrounding The Guard seem to be an isolated case and unlikely to occur frequently. So treating it as a precedent-setting case might be an overreach.
Existing Contracts: The players have contracts and agreements that likely already contain clauses that could prevent such "selling of spots," and if those clauses aren't there, that's a contractual oversight, not a precedent-setting opportunity.
Integrity Preserved: If the skill of the players earned the spot, then those same players should arguably be able to compete, regardless of the banner they're under. This maintains the competitive integrity based on skill, not on branding.
Unfair to Players: This decision might be deemed unfair to the players who legitimately won their spot but are now being penalized for administrative issues beyond their control.
Missed Opportunity: If the concern is genuinely about "selling spots," then this could be an occasion to refine and clarify the rules around acquisitions and mergers between teams, rather than penalize a team that has otherwise complied with the existing rules.
Commercial Reality: In many other sports, players do get transferred between teams, and teams do get acquired. As long as this doesn't violate the established rules of the sport, it's considered part of the game's commercial reality.
So, while the tournament organizers have a point about wanting to prevent the "selling" of tournament slots, one could argue that their approach in this specific instance might not be the most equitable or logically consistent.
LEO FARIA SHOULD'VE USED CHAT GPT ITS FREE.
and it provided a better statement as to how he could've defended himself.
why Guard didn't accept riot terms.
what riot terms were.
this is like kanpeki getting a spot on sentinels. hes just a nepo baby!
It appears you may be operating under a misconception. While you don't have full access to internal information within Fnatic, the organization itself does, equipping them with the insights needed to make informed decisions about player roster changes, stop viewing the situation through a fisheye lens. For anyone closely following Fnatic, it's evident that the specific issues you're questioning have been a part of the organization's dynamics since its inception.
they need to get rid of tubby first.
are we forgetting M80's origins?
these issues have been present since the start. the firepower upgrade only hid them.
yep. its the law of diminishing returns.
Fnatic is making a significant misstep by considering the removal of their flexiest player, Chronicle. This comes without addressing the more pressing issues related to Boaster and Mini. Boaster's decision to stick with an outdated composition during the match against LOUD on Haven was a key factor in the loss, while Mini's inability to adapt and innovate has also hindered the team's progress. Ironically, Boaster also shares the blame for the team's lack of adaptability. If Fnatic proceeds with removing Chronicle, it would be a colossal error, as any team worldwide would consider themselves fortunate to have a player of his caliber.
its unfortunate that Boaster's contract is finishing in 2025 otherwise we could posssbily see a change, but dont forget, Boaster is also their poster boy.
Chronicle is not the reason why FNC were struggling. it was their lack of innovation. Chronicle is a sponge and can adapt according to what he is being taught.
i dont get why chronicle is getting owned tho. i also think boaster is running the team, but both boaster and mini are to blame. (press conference after loss, Boaster decied to run old comp of Haven instead of new one. so boaster is scared to innovate. but FNC have no choice but to keep him since his contract is until 2025 )
Discord