greedeetv
Flag: United States
Registered: February 19, 2021
Last post: November 18, 2024 at 3:51 PM
Posts: 1810
1 •• 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 •• 36

It's another close map judging by how long it's taking. Or there is a technical problem.

posted about 3 years ago

Granted, there was a lot of teamplay, but they won a lot because of individual aim battles. TenZ was losing aimduels left and right on icebox, and individual duels were a big reason why they nearly lost. Once he started winning his battles, they choo-choo'd their way through the second half of icebox and 13-0'd split. It definitely makes a big difference.

posted about 3 years ago

daps definitely isn't the best of players, but their team has a lot of firepower, so I think it might be a bit more difficult for SQ, especially when they adapt to playing with tex.

posted about 3 years ago

Sure, they might be a little inconsistent when it comes to maps, but definitely not tier 3. High tier 2/low tier 1.

posted about 3 years ago

Reaaaaally? I think they could beat literally all of the teams you mentioned. Maybe not NRG.

posted about 3 years ago

Agreed!

posted about 3 years ago

GG. Noble pulled off the upset!

posted about 3 years ago

I actually think stylistically, T1 would've been more worrisome for 100T. I actually think 100T will win this pretty convincingly. Maybe a close map one.

posted about 3 years ago

I support NA, just not Sentinels. I just don't know, I like rooting for the underdogs and it seems to me like that team is always #1.

posted about 3 years ago

I agree, but the only team I would put them above on the vlr.gg rankings is C9B. Top 6. Also that match was SEN's first ever game as a team afaik. And they handled em on icebox. So we'll see.

posted about 3 years ago

You sound like you have the maturity level of a five year old dude. I don't know how you are still commenting on a site like this.

posted about 3 years ago

We'll see. It depends on where the line is between T1 and T2 imo. I think they could beat the teams like XSET, ABX, IMT, maybe LG, but I dunno if you could consider that Tier 1.

posted about 3 years ago

I mean it would work a hell of a lot better against the SENs and the FaZes of NA because of their tendency to rely on aim duels. EU I agree though.

posted about 3 years ago

Yeah, probably, but they would've gotten maybe 5 rounds between the two maps whereas Soniqs got 10 rounds on one map alone. They need more practice on other maps, that's their issue.

posted about 3 years ago

No upward mobility (except omen) on a map that's played primarily on different height levels. No entries, barely any flashes. Tragic comp.

posted about 3 years ago

I mean, this isn't the first time you edited a comment to make yourself look better. It's ok, we all know what really happened :)

posted about 3 years ago

I mean... in what world did they play bad? They played better than one might expect from a 32 seed, and vlr.gg ranking is still pretty accurate imo.

posted about 3 years ago

Really? I mean even getting 13-0'd, they proved on the first map that they deserve their #9 rating on vlr.gg, but definitely not the #32 seed. Sucks they didn't get a higher seed, but that's my only takeaway. This is about as good as everyone expected.

posted about 3 years ago

No, on map two you said "13-4". You were off by four rounds.

posted about 3 years ago

WELP. They put in good work on Icebox. NT.

posted about 3 years ago

We're going to MAP THREEEEE

posted about 3 years ago

I agree. I'm not sure I like Sova over Sage. Rest of the picks are pretty good though based on what I've seen. Maybe cypher > killjoy.

posted about 3 years ago

Did you actually just edit your comment like that. This is why this dude needs the boot. ADMINS WYA.

posted about 3 years ago

Menace living up to his name so far

posted about 3 years ago

Aren't you the one that said 13-2?

posted about 3 years ago

You need to fix your link pls :)

posted about 3 years ago

For real! (But I'm still rooting for Soniqs) ;)

posted about 3 years ago

Yeah this should be a round of 8 or 4 game rather than a ro32

posted about 3 years ago

Yeah the aim's definitely there for the Aussies

posted about 3 years ago

We need a report system so that users who are negative attention seekers and a drag to the productivity of the forums would be punished. Acount23, NSG_Observer_2, and raka_gg are users that I’m talking about.

posted about 3 years ago

Go back to the dark slimy hole you came from. Can we ban this dude.

posted about 3 years ago

ur*

posted about 3 years ago

Show SEN who’s boss! (Good read btw)

posted about 3 years ago

Yeah I'm not really a guy that cares about the money, other than to rub it in an org's face when their player fails lmfao

posted about 3 years ago

Honestly depends on duelists. Yeah I know Shanks is bad, but he has his moments. If coinflip goes in their favor, and Showtime and Shanks pop off, we could be looking at a Rise win. But other than that, yeah, IMT 2-0.

posted about 3 years ago

Yeah I mean that's a lot of money. I wonder if Ethan was paid that amount or more, and how much tenz will make a month comparatively.

posted about 3 years ago

You’re*

posted about 3 years ago

H

posted about 3 years ago

I liked them better when their name meant big anime boobs, but KK 2-0

posted about 3 years ago

They aboutta DIG a hole to bury T1 in, amirite

posted about 3 years ago

I mean, we can guess, but we don't know. They were very dominant in Australian valorant, but there's just no concrete way to compare it to North American valorant. I can say that Soniqs probably do deserve their #9 rating, though. But, against the #1 team in NA? I doubt they can win, but I'm sure it will be interesting.

posted about 3 years ago

Can we ban this dude, comment history is appalling

posted about 3 years ago

F

posted about 3 years ago

Let’s hope complexity can make this one interesting!

posted about 3 years ago

Good to see calypso popping off as he should be again

posted about 3 years ago
1 •• 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 •• 36