i didn't say anywhere that it is objectively wrong to believe, personally, that all individuals accused of a crime are innocent until proven guilty
i said that it is wrong to prescribe that requirement to public opinion, and there is no functional basis to applying that to ones' personal opinion
and i called him a dumb sack of shit, correctly, for incorrectly making that prescription without basis
the only basis for doing it is if you can't think critically enough to realize there is a difference between the requirement set for how the justice system must treat the accused and how the public can in the comfort of their own home. it is just a very simple-minded way of thinking about it by latching onto a catchphrase without understanding, in depth, what it actually means