f55
Flag: Canada
Registered: March 19, 2022
Last post: December 9, 2024 at 2:47 AM
Posts: 499
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 •• 10

you have 7000 posts :KEKW:

posted about a year ago

bronze 1

posted about a year ago

817 posts

posted about a year ago

7/39

posted about a year ago

6/39

posted about a year ago

5/39

posted about a year ago

4/39

posted about a year ago

3/39

posted about a year ago

💀

posted about a year ago

0/39 comeback

posted about a year ago

6/39

posted about a year ago

4/39

posted about a year ago

thanks

posted about a year ago

copium

posted about a year ago

lost a map to kc?

posted about a year ago

0/39

posted about a year ago

I have wondered where the conversation around IGLs ends for a while, so here I go starting it. If one was to realistically create criteria for quantifying and accurately measuring which IGLs are good, unlike other roles where you can take KAST, ADR, Clutches, etc. into account and create parity, it becomes difficult for an IGL as you cannot evaluate strategy, mid-rounding and just leadership objectively. Like how do you rate leadership? A good leader can lead in different ways, command respect in different avenues, etc.
Now, I am a football fan and one way a "captain" is evaluated, like Xavi in Barcelona, Gundogan in Man City (in terms of a good leader) or Harry Maguire in Man United (lol) for a study around what quality leaders provide and the only legit criteria I found was "improvement". Why is this the case? Imagine you have two equal-quality teams, in this situation, the better IGL would navigate a win 10/10 times if they played. Now if it's like a team with players 20% better, in that case, the same repeated would yield 8 wins if they played 10 times. Now, therefore, an evaluation of how much better a team or a group of players look with the presence of a good IGL is the test for what a good IGL looks like, for example, look at the top tier 1 IGLs in the scene, people like Boaster, FNS, Sadhaak, etc. A comparison would look like Marved at Sentinels, like clearly a terrible IGL because the team looked way worse qualitatively than with a different leader or IGL.
With this context, what's the community's opinion on IGLs? Gimme a top 10 including tier 2 and tier 3, I honestly think Hellranger is up there.

posted about a year ago

if they lose

posted about a year ago

this is your job now

posted about a year ago

they cant win in 39 rounds we have to change

posted about a year ago

bro change flairs

posted about a year ago

8/39

posted about a year ago

after this time out

posted about a year ago

3/39

posted about a year ago

2/39

posted about a year ago

shit on navi

posted about a year ago

ok

posted about a year ago

bros stuck in 2021

posted about a year ago

t3 vs t1 no shit

posted about a year ago

flair

posted about a year ago

most smart 100T Fan

posted about a year ago

no shot if there qual that 8 at most

posted about a year ago

w take

posted about a year ago

cant get anymore lil bro

posted about a year ago

i have ADHD and i have 14 cans of monster in my closet i just collect different cans 🗿

posted about a year ago

16-3

posted about a year ago

let me lists the teams that shit on you
koi
nrg
eg
PRX
Loud
Kru

posted about a year ago

dont care get shit on by koi

posted about a year ago

kc took a map how

posted about a year ago

fuck no

posted about a year ago

6 downvotes :Sadge:

posted about a year ago

FiNESSE
crashies
yay
marved
Victor

posted about a year ago

fax

posted about a year ago
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 •• 10