I could be wrong but I think he's taking a mental break
| Flag: | Canada |
| Registered: | May 7, 2024 |
| Last post: | June 30, 2025 at 7:24 PM |
| Posts: | 12970 |
I could be wrong but I think he's taking a mental break
Say it on your main. Oh wait, which one's your main again?
Doubling down only makes the bait worse in this case 0.5/8
Title too long + it's ChatGPT'd 1/8 nice try nihso
He did... questionable things to get them back
Should riot start scripting games to manufacture narratives?
No.
What's the point in putting a blank space between each individual tier? Isn't it redundant at that point?
He doesn't hide his face because he's ugly, what?
Not VALORANT, but Sandstorm somehow went from Geometry Dash (one of the first to verify Bloodbath) to Brawlhalla (arguably the best in the world for some time, popularized scythe and then greatsword)
This isn't actually the rule. I'm just demonstrating that if it were, nothing would change, and it therefore doesn't do any good to argue for it expecting a different outcome
Gonna assume this was prompted by the tie in Group Omega in Pacific.
Head-to-head between the four tied teams:
RRQ 2-1
TLN 2-1
T1 1-2
NS 1-2
That would put RRQ and TLN in a tie breaker for 1st place (RRQ wins), and T1 and NS in a tie breaker for 3rd place (T1 wins). This puts the order at RRQ, TLN, T1, and NS respectively.
TL;DR: Nothing changes.
They can definitely try to ask for a reconsideration, but judging by the fact that Francis has already deleted his tweet, I think they've accepted the current outcome
6/10 pun btw
Yeah, this whole thing is definitely a huge misunderstanding, and the rules need to not only be rewritten for clarification, but also disclosed to teams in a way that's comprehensive.
Also, note: when it says "determines who advances," they mean which team advances past the tie breaker. Again, an instance of lack of clarity in wording
When going through a tie breaker, what we're trying to do isn't sort the teams, but rather decide a winner. So when we find a winner in RRQ between the four teams, there are now three teams who remain tied. That's when we move to a three-team tie breaker.
To clarify on the note, it's possible for a four-way tie breaker to break into two individual two-way tie breakers. For example, if TLN had the same map differential as RRQ, then they'd go into a tie breaker for 1st and 2nd, whilst T1 and NS would go into a separate tie breaker for 3rd and 4th.
Nope. I do have egg noodle soup from time to time, if that counts
This is a good way of putting it. Once you've won the tie breaker, it isn't necessary to participate in the ones that follow
Easier and/or more fair is always going to be subjective and rather opinionated. I'm not trying to argue for nor against... I'm just elaborating on why it is how it is
It's very, very simple.
There are four teams (RRQ, TLN, T1, NS), so we use the four-way tie breaker (map differential) to put RRQ in 1st.
Then there are three teams (TLN, T1, NS), so we use the three-way tie breaker (head-to-head) to put TLN in 2nd.
Then there are two teams (T1, NS), so we use the two-way tie breaker (head-to-head match score) to put T1 in 3rd and NS in 4th.
That's how these tie breakers work.
You're not looking at how many teams there are in the tie and then going down the respective list. You're trying to narrow down the number of teams in the tie by removing teams from it. We had 4 teams, so we narrowed it down to 3, and then to 2.
Maggi (I don't actually eat noodles I just had it one time as a kid)
May I help you?
We'll be asking the questions old man. Who are you?
Yu.
No, not me. You.
Yes, I'm Yu.
Just answer the damn question! Who are you?
I have told you!
Are you deaf?
No. Yu is blind.
I'm not blind. You blind.
That is what I just said.
That's what I'm asking you.
And Yu was answering.
Shut up! You!
Yes?
Not you. Him! What's your name?
Mi.
Yes, you.
I'm Mi.
He's Mi and I'm Yu.
And I'm about to whoop your old ass man because I am sick of playing games! You, me? Everybody's ass around here!
Has to be the 9 rounds from 3-11 to 12-11 at São Paulo, no?
Indonesia casually winning both groups:
Case in point
I'd try to ragebait but you can't respond for another 8 minutes sooo
Who would nataNk replace? Because his roles overlap with sheydos and soulcas, who are two of KOI's better players
You'd have to play smokes I think but sure I'm all for it
Surely a team of Autumn SWERL pl1xx Maple +1 would make playoffs consistently
Does this mean you're not playing premier this week
Imagine making a roster change mid-Stage 1 and it's bringing in Governer
Tough call. On one hand, GX won more than half a map per BO3 on average. On the other hand, APK didn't get 13-0'd by ANGE1. Definitely pretty 50-50
Since when did our goat Tacolilla care about what was meta
Definitely for better. The less attention you pay to shallow and obvious ragebait, the better
Thoughts on Taco being a Yoru one-trick now?
It's his gimmick. He's been at it for at least 8 months now
No team is focused on the stats while playing. They're just trying to win. If they can do it in 2 maps, good for them... if it takes 3, so be it
Makes complete sense to me, honestly. Team A and Team B are at the same level, but Team A beat Team B so they get priority seeding. Yeah, it can be tough, but any tie breaker's gonna be tough for whoever's negatively impacted, and frankly this method seems the most fair to me.
(Also the other stats do matter because if there was a 3-way-tie they'd be used to decide who gets priority seeding)
Cryo's already playing Chamber
ardiis is a signed costreamer
Laz retired
yay's already playing Chamber (at least was in Kickoff)
If this hits 30 upvotes I kick Elysium from the server
To be fair, of everyone on the known core 5 for Paper Rex, mindfreak was the one who switched roles the least. He was always playing either smokes or senti
LOUD has to be my favourite tier 2 LATAM team
Discord