| Flag: | Scotland |
| Registered: | March 14, 2021 |
| Last post: | June 9, 2024 at 7:40 PM |
| Posts: | 1029 |
I'm completely puzzled at this point.... Did you actually start this topic just to disagree with people? Or do you believe your view on things is so superior to others' that it allows you to flex your "critical thinking" and black/white thingy? Some of us(cough..cough) on here have sufficient academic experience to provide you with a complete semester on critical thinking and decision-making, let alone comparing two teams.
Technically, 100t are a better team in terms of money won, trophies won - First Strike... and up to date score between the two stands NV 2-4 100t with 100t winnig NV in the last two recent matches. If there's another way to look at it, please let me know.
Since that loss to Andbox 2-0 on 22/04/21, SEN have won 19 Havens and only managed to lose 2 to only one team - XSET. Moreover, between the two on Haven, the score stands SEN 7-1 100t so far - since the beginning.
BTW, SEN's Haven is the best map out of the six ---> SEN's map stats:
https://www.vlr.gg/team/stats/2/sentinels/
You are right.... 100t could've picked Icebox (their 2nd best map) instead of SEN's most played and best map to date - Haven. But tbh, SEN are good on any map, hence it doesn't really matter what you pick against them imho. Maybe 100t thought SEN would not practice Haven enough in favour other maps they've played less, as a counteracting measure. But we can see SEN's Haven is still very intimidating.
Edit: Sorry, 1Header from me.... In bold previously mentioned Ascent replaced for Icebox as Ascent had been banned by SEN.
I don't recognise FPX anymore. They are still a good team but something is missing(obviously... if you look at their match history).
Since Johnta's departure(conflict with management from what I heard), things don't go well for FPX. Not going to lie but I kind of prefered more Johnta as a coach and d00mbr0s as an analyst due to massive work required to prepare for catching up, ascending competition in the region - not just d00mbr0s as of now. However, Johnta with TH already but it is still possible to hire either a coach or an analyst for FPX. Hope Chinese owners realise that and get us someone to strenghtend the squad.
He said about seven months ago that he doesn't want to only play for an org as a sole player, but also have some power over choosing the appropriate players and so on. He and Faze had a thing back when Faze had been forming, but they didn't agree in the end. He also mentioned how much he enjoys streaming but he is open to new opportunities, if the proper one presents itself.
No, that's not the case as Gambit has never been SCRIMBUX team in the first place! Due to coming from CIS, they have to scrim other teams cause of higher level competition outside of CIS but, they are legit top 1 CIS team and a PRO team. Calling them SCRIMBUX team is utterly disrespectful to the boys. This "scrimbux" is for some reason only applies to GAMBIT. As, I said PlatChat have mentioned in the past that but community keep dragging this eventhough PlatChat already moved on. Yes, for people who doesn't follow CIS, Gambit is uknown but that doesn't give them permission to downgrade such pro team calling them "scrimbux" team. Like, imagine you play for a pro team since beginning of Valorant and community keeps calling you a "scrimbux" even though you have won big teams outside of scrims.
Can we stop associating this stupid and inferior term as "scrimbux" with GAMBIT? They have never been a scrimbux team in the f-ing first place! With all due respect to PlatChat boyz, we don't have to keep parroting this bs. They have said it once and have already moved on yet VLR keep parroting this shit. Gambit is legit top tier, CIS top1 team that plays differently, given occasion, tourny or time. They have won big teams from different regions through VCT and are trying their best atm.
Listen, you are criticising MVP of the match. And even such players are not insured against making mistakes on occasions - remember that 5% human error can go to 20% too. Like that was some CRACKING and intensive game, man.
I just wanted to say that all those plays have been agreed within their respective teams. It's not that Yay had suddenly decided to play uber agressive and went on with that approach. Faze are themselves very agressive team and will punish you for playing deep/passive style, hence the agressive response from Yay and NV. But NV lost too many clutches in that game which led to their defeat IMHO. BTW, if you want to spot an agressive Jetts, just check out their first player to die percentage. There is a lot of similarity between variaty of Jetts that kind of divides them in two groups.
Guys it's an agressive style of play on Jett. You push/dash or whatever and get SPACE for your team, picking up few kills before getting killed, if at all. Yay played that Haven very good, getting MVP of the match ffs. Regarding, Wardell or cNed type of Jett style - it's different mainly in its pace. They play slower Jett style compared to TenZ/Derke/Yay and Jamppi. People blaming Jamppi getting killed too quickly forget that they don't know the initial goal of TL on how their Jett should be played. Well, their Jett create space and maybe pick up some kills then ScreaM or rest gets in to clear etc.
Yeah, I know very well about them, and ofc will be watching the match tomorrow - it will be a good test for both teams. Though G2 vs Oxygen is another great test match for both teams - new G2 vs improving Oxygen.
SociablEE impressed me very much especially on Ascent but both looked very intimidating. Given Oxygen's win over Giants, this kind of level from Turkish teams we want to see more.
Bruvvv... neither your "British person's teeth..." nor your "EU val is worse than NA" statements are constructive or objective, because Brits have normal teeth like everyone else, and EU is not worse than NA, judging from a very tight two-game series between FNC and SEN. It's almost as if some NA members have decided to be arrogant and disrespectful to everyone outside of NA, flexing their foolish beliefs on others.
KID, get REAL or F off.
BTW, I'm from CANADA
I eat lots of cheesburgers myself but I don't think that's the reason why Hiko or Ange1(yeah, he also has baby face) has a baby face. And reacton times are irrelevant measure as we haven't put them both in test yet. Quit BS kid.... and leave alone saturated fat rich food as it's my favorite ;)
Cough ... cough ... Hiko is actually OLDER than Ange1 while Steel is 3 months younger.
I expected better from them too but win is a win at the end of the day.
Thank you, bro, for the explanation. I was aware of the translation, but you provided a far more complete breakdown.
Bruhh... you don't even need to play Valorant to have a valid opinion on Pro teams and building strats etc, let alone be highly ranked in this game. As an example, we could look at Forze's ex-coach Pnukh under whom they won CIS's First Strike. Or maybe we could look at Mourinho success in RL football and many more ofc. Should we tell them all they need to be SHUSHED cause they are BOTS?
I've never understood such a NARROW-MINDEDNESS in people like you. Like where do you get those 1Head bollock opinions? How do they form at all in your head?
It was an early model of your personal computer.... plz stop cause you're digging a deep 1Head pit for yourself.
Even the erliest one considered contributing into computational machinery was Blaise Pascal - neither from NA.
Cough ... cough ... Alan Turing....
Broski, I never mindlessly and disrespectfully argue as I respect a nicely laid discussion which is supported by good arguments - or at least I believe in that. And there's nothing wrong in stating your own oppinion in general, you know? The only thing is we have to leave some room for ourselves to be wrong too. But instead, on occasions, some people push their own oppinions on others and try to convince them in something without any supported arguments such as stats, news or whatever.
Regarding those orgs, I'd say those guys have been around in Val pro scene since the beginning but due to some unfourtunate events they had not been given a decent chance in proving their worth. I'm not even someone to judge such people but I feel like someone like supamen, shanks, vanity, koler and the rest from those teams deserve to be amongst the best of today's Valorant in NA. There is absolutely no doubt in that but trying to fit all them in teams is actually problematic which require a certain professional vision by someone with experience. And that how we get to GIANTS with a coach by the name "pipson", and if you've followed CS, you should know who he is. I tend to believe that due to his previous experience, pipson has a good shot at making balanced teams which we currently see in face of GIANTS. So, their success is partially dependant on their management/coach vision as well as their players performance. And there is nothing groundbraking in their success as pople knew who they were from the beginning. Only those who started following Valorant recently think that such teams are "nonames" and I can't blame them for that. It's just I don't agree with pushing their oppinion on others is the right thing.
BTW, there are many more ex-pros or exceptional talents who are trying to get into Valorant scene. And from my estimation we need another maybe 2 years to stabilise the scene. I mean, I can go for 2k words to lay down the explanation but I'm sure you're here not for this.
I thought, he is going to join some Turkish roster with known players but don't quote me on that as not following cs in generall. Link to Loba:
In NA yes, it is but in EU it's 3rd or 2nd, deppends how you count it from the top as Haven and Icebox share the 1st place with 55% for attacking side win from recent VCT's. But then, EU looks like playing hell of attacking style, in general.
https://www.vlr.gg/event/agents/576/champions-tour-north-america-stage-3-challengers-2
https://www.vlr.gg/event/agents/544/champions-tour-europe-stage-3-challengers-2
BTW, David has come a long way since his G2 departure and has overcome some life turning decisions to stay and entertain us in the game. I mean, I feel like he's been massively misunderstood be it in his MM or pro games. Hope, we can see some positive in him, given some strats are dictated by their coach and not per player decision etc. So, please take it easy before throwing something like, "..fucking baiter." - it's just not SPORT.
He is playing Viper B site.... One round he even clutched on ScreaM. I mean, VGIA already stomped TL 2-0 in a more important match earlier so it's all cool, no?
He's playing on B while TL taking A every rounds so he's left alone with the decision to save or to fight. Casters even said that on one round VGIA stacked 4 on A but lost leaving David alone again.
Bro, this kid doesn't know that as he's never even subbed to Hazed channel.
STFU you little disgrace.... Everything from you is just trolling and trolling - nothing useful. You wanna troll, then go troll with your mom, you piece of s....
Yes, you are. "hazed being old af" doesn't cut it for an argument, given you haven't even tried to compare his stats against other TSM members. And this kind of weak ass arguments comes from a TSM supporter which is you btw? Disgrace!
Here's Hazed against Leviathan avgs from last eight matches - winstreak:
HAZED: acs(204) adr(134) k(39) d(34) a(14) +/-(5)
LEVI: acs(197) adr(126) k(37) d(34) a(18) +/-(4)
https://i.imgur.com/GHuvleh.png
As you can see both players perform somewhat equally with Hazed slightly edging over Levi's numbers. Therefore, if you think that Leviathan is good than you should think Hazed is good too. PERIOD. No more shit ass comments on how he's old af, bro. You should support your team FFS.
Just learn about Fnatic something before you assume that either the low tab Boaster or Brits are the problem.
About 52-53% win for attack and 47-48% win for defence.
From EU's recent:
https://www.vlr.gg/event/agents/544/champions-tour-europe-stage-3-challengers-2
From NA's recent:
https://www.vlr.gg/event/agents/576/champions-tour-north-america-stage-3-challengers-2
The agent TAB will lead you to those stats.
Actually, you should blame yourself, if commenting not prepared - also known as disinformation. I mean people around here expect you to know wtf you're talking about, right? If you'd made a mistake, then it's no shame to come out and say you'd f it up. Also WTF are you saying V1, Rise, DZ, XSET and Pioneers are nonames. Like for real bruhhh....
Danzo ну WTF?
I don't need translate for that as esh li arbaha ehidot be lashon ve hamesh ehidot be rusit - bagrut. BTW, you don't have to reply with hate speech.... I know that sometimes it could be felt as unfair but it's not going to make shit better.
what exactly or which comment # he said anything bad?
Agree on that.... I tried to bring up the discipline part and to point out that burn outs from overloading can not be predicted or forseen. Like the burn outs are the time of accumualted strain on your nervous system which doesn't go over the night. The discipline is there to protect players from such an ambigous phenomena, yet people still don't take it seriously. There were some prodigies amongst athlete like say Denis Rodman but many of us require strict discipline to perform well.... All I'm saying is that Matt needs to go to bed ffs
If anything, I'd be more concerned with a long-term discipline.... There has to be some consistency in that, otherwise the effects of that mental overload can come up at times when top performance is at the stake. I really hope that I am wrong here, though.
Maybe against a better teams than meowmeow but still impressive. KPR will flatten out in the long-run anyway eventually. Though Corey is such a good player.
You are correct and I will never argue on that but I don't see the reason of dragging this topic on as I've stated that in my above #7 reply. But many people on here are just 1Heads haters/bandwagoners grupies who get offended at anything when said against teams they support. PERIOD
Again, go and tell that to Hobbit if you even know who that is... or you can state Hobbit's achievments throughout his CS career here, so that I can point you where exactly you're wrong. BTW I'm a NAVI fan in cs.
Theroretically in VALORANT, you can play one map FOREVER. Yeah, much more than 44 rounds or even 100 rounds. That's why you look at kill per round RATIO and not total as total kills won't reflect anything useful apart maybe how consistent the player in question is. Though, it's is still nice to reach such kill number etc, but I don't get why some people 1Head react as if they are offended n stuff....
And that's why I stated at the end "total kills per match 49 kills by Nature stands the highest atm." However it's a >>>STUPID<<< statistic to consider - total kills, let alone something to be proud of as kill per round ratio of 1.11 - nothing impressive. Asuna's kill per round of 1.33 is better but I'm sure we can find higher.
Not broken if number of rounds is considered. Asuna played 36 rounds whereas Nature 44. Though in total kills per match 49 kills by Nature stands the highest atm.
Yeah, so bad that 3 out of top 5 teams on HLTV all speak Russian language - CIS. But whatever, nothing surprises me on here tbfh
Tell that to Hobbit ... but I'll make an assumption that you don't know shit about cs, if you allow yourself to say something like that
Discord