Jett is not debatable. Demon1 has 1.12 Jett stats in 83 matches, while Aspas has 1.26 Jett stats in 173 matches. Even if you are talking about peak, it wouldn't make sense. At the height of Demon1, at Champions 2023, Aspas was the best Jett in the Camp, with the most impact and stats.

Something: 132 Jett games, 1.16 stats

Aspas: 173 Jett games, 1.26 stats

There is no comparison between Jett of the two. Aspas has more titles with Jett, more iconic Clutches, more matches, more stats, more everything.

Is anyone considering really Lautaro!?

How do you see this? In the view of most Brazilians, Vini Jr is the person who deserves the Ballon d'Or, Bellingham is the person who deserves the most after Vini Jr, and Rodri is the guy that Europeans want to be the Ballon d'Or.

Look, Rodri wasn't City's best player, neither in the Champions League nor in the PL, and he wasn't Spain's best player in the Euro Cup, he wasn't even the best midfielder in Spain, Olmo had a better Euro Cup than from Rodri.

In my view, him winning the Ballon d'Or is as absurd as him winning the award for best player at the Eurocup.

"Their game plan was to play for Aspas the entire time" You are wrong. Icebox, Leviatan's best map, literally had no flash. It's a comp that clearly doesn't favor Aspas.

I know that many in VLR think that Aspas was a baiter, and that's why he had such high stats. However, this statement only makes any sense in the Champions, where Aspas actually had a very low FK rate, largely due to Leviatan's style of play. If you take Leviatan's entire year, Aspas will have an FK rate above most duelists, and absurdly monstrous stats.

Kick Off: 1.17 rating and 0.15 FK (He lost 2 of the 3 games he played)

Stage 1: 1.31 rating and 0.16 FK

Masters: 1.17 KD and 0.21 FK(!!) (He lost 2 of the 3 games he played)

Stage 2: 1.32 rating and 0.22 FK(!!)

This data shows that the impact of the loss of Aspas will be absurd on Leviatan, much greater than most people expect.

I hope this is a bait, because your statement is simply a lie.

Kangkang did not diffed Aspas. In the only match between them, even though they won, Kangkang was 13/12 in direct duels, with Aspas having a 1.07 rating, while Kankang had 1.01.

Neither does Miniboo. In the first match between them, Aspas had a 1.30 rating, being Leviatan's best player, while Miniboo had a 1.01 rating. In the second game, Aspas had a rating of 0.90, while Miniboo had a rating of 1.13.

I don't know if you're talking about Miniboo or Kangkang, so I'll answer both ways.

Regionally: Aspas >>>>> Miniboo
Masters: Aspas = Miniboo
Champions: Aspas >>>>> Miniboo

Regionally: Aspas >>> Kangkang
Masters: Aspas >>> Kangkang
Champions: Kangkang >>> Aspas

In my opinion, Kangkang didn't perform well in the Masters, nor was he the best on his own team in the Champions. Yes, he became a god in the final, but the championship is not just about the end, the journey is equally important.

Taking this into account, Aspas, who was Leviatan's best player in ALL championships of the year, has a better individual performance than Kangkang.

I know that Kangkang had a good ACS in both Masters, but you can't take a specific statistic and say that this person played well. For example, MIBR player Palla had an excellent FK rate in Américas Stage 2. Does that make his Stage 2 good? Obviously not.

Miniboo above Aspas is absurd. Miniboo performed well at Masters Madrid, but did not participate in Masters Shanghai, just as Aspas performed well at Masters Shanghai, but did not participate in Masters Madrid, meaning they are tied in this regard. However, Aspas' performance in Champions was much better than Miniboo's performance in Champions. Furthermore, regionally we can't even compare, Aspas was MUCH superior.

Personally, I think Aspas' performance this year is better than Kangkang's, but that's debatable.

It wasn't obvious at all that LOUD was going to win. On map 1, if it weren't for 1 very unlikely move by Sacy, LOUD would have lost. On map 3, if it weren't for Aspas performing a miracle, and taking the game to Overtime, LOUD would have lost. Map 2 and 4 were Stomps for their respective sides.

In short, it was a very balanced ending.

LOUD performed much better than NRG this year, and slightly better than C9.

He has been performing well for years, including having an average rating of 1.10 in 2024. However, no one considers him top 5 duelists in the Americas.

He had a better year than Oxy, he had a better year than Jawgemo, why do you keep underestimating him?