he def wont get signed in t1 but he could do alright in sea t2 if he gets signed there
| Flag: | Australia |
| Registered: | June 10, 2023 |
| Last post: | October 28, 2025 at 4:40 PM |
| Posts: | 8846 |
he def wont get signed in t1 but he could do alright in sea t2 if he gets signed there
it was more that t1 just had an amazing tournament than it was g2 choking tbh. They were thriving off the momentum they had
bumping a thread at the top of the forum page is crazy work
not many people will remember the fact that talon lost over a month ago to team secret on talons map pick of pearl.
I can barely remember who won what maps for yesterdays games, yet alone over a month ago
most people interpret ur post as u confusing rrq with team secret as often the term "losing" without reference to a specific map would be in the context of losing an entire game/series.
If ur actual intent was to complain about them losing on pearl to team secret then u should mention pearl
I mean either the losing teams play tmmr or the winnning teams play tmmr. I prefer the losing teams but I can see an argument for the winning teams.
Winning teams make it to masters so they are imporatnt matches so they should be given more time to prepare than teams that most likely won't make it (lower round 1 teams).
asuna. bro needs to stop yapping sometimes
this is very true these past 2 years. In 2023 teams would perform better on their map picks way more often.
people laugh at fns bc of his terrible aim and mechanics. He is still on a team bc he is a great igl
fr mini is the goat. above potter in my books.
He's also great at scouting
Player to Player comparisons in determining who will win has to be one of the dumbest ways to determine who will most likely win a match.
Comparing player to player can tell you some things such as mechs and stats but this doesn't determine the better team as valorant is a team based game and how a team uses util, how they call, and how they communicate and coordinate matters way more than just raw skill.
E.g. You could have five players individually worse than the enemy team, but if they trade perfectly, use utility smartly, and have better plans, they can easily win.
If you assemble a super team filled with a bunch of random players who are all amazing this doesn't guarantee success, as shown by NRG last year, NRG the year before, 100t, 2023 SEN, NAVI and so many more. The only successful superteams I can think off would be 2024 LEV and 2023 FNC.
Seems to me that most superteams fail at delivering expectations.
tldr: player to player comparisons ignore things like team chemistry, confidence, team coordination(comms, mid rounding, and coaching), team plays, team playstyle matchups, team momentum, roles, game pressure and teams susceptibility to being anti strated
they really don't. they don't even win their matches that convincingly AND they lack international experience.
out of the 12 maps they have played, 5 were within 2 rounds in which they won all 5. Imagine if they only won 3 of those. Also they are in the worst group and are only 2nd best
both nrg and 100t looked pretty awful today. dont get ur hopes up
bro acting like playoffs is over
Dont know why u think SEN had teams issues and even if this is true this is no excuse for bang performing the worst on SEN.
Just because he is a new player on SEN this doesnt mean he should be playing worse than he usually would. I don't see any evidence of newer players improving overtime at an increased rate than the rest of his team.
even in Americas Pancada and V1c has more impact than bang. he also had a negative kd and not even a positive rating during kick-off despite being on the 2nd placed team
u linked what u thought was evidence for him generalising, if what u linked wasn't generalising then why did u link it?
🤦
He made 2 edits. 1 was a few minutes before u posted and the other was 5 minutes after.
The edit after u posted did not change the last sentence
U even linked what he said in #32 and u can see how it didnt change after the edit
all good?? there is nothing wrong with the last sentence bro
I was there a long time ago but I remember the fish was amazing.
we getting relegated with this one
it's deaths while using it
nvm I was wrong after checking my own profile. I always thought it was deaths while using it, they either changed it which I doubt or I was somehow mistaken.
Anyway mb
I don't think OP was 100% endorsing everything 1243 says about Brazil, 1243 does generalise but not in any racist way u describe. OP was just venting frustrations about some fans being toxic in this context, the line "starting to believe" is more of like a way of kinda seeing where 1243 is coming from in this moment, not a "I agree with all the generations". It's more just careless phrasing than actual hate or literal agreeance with 1243.
that's just banter bro. Completely different contexts to what happened in Reins post
the guy said "some" indiviudals from the brazil community. They were not generalising. Racist part has to be bait as well.
even in comp he has a 2kd with the sheriff (most are pistols and some are ecos i assume)
if he goes sheriff only he may go positive
brother teams are in for 2 years min.
This may change with the new relegation stuff they are doing for non partnered teams but this wasn't in place during the 2024 season.
bro does not know what confirmation bias is.
If teams saw this G2 comp and decided to try it but they play worse with this comp and decided to use this comp despite it not working then this is confirmation bias
leo doesn't do any region scheduling. There are people in charge of each region and the guy in charge of EMEA decided this was the schedule
C9 3-2 SEN (maybe kru)
pretty sure most teams will try the g2 comp in scrims and if they play better with this comp then they will simply use the comp.
this guy is just on the cope. prx look trash
sorta unfair to compare them since if u put demon1 in 2022 then yay would be the better player bc of how well yay's playstyle matched the chamber meta and demon1 would do better in 2023.
So if u just compare pure impact and stats Yay's would be higher overall
mibr most certainly had practice and they got different igls but their playstyle is very similar to what is what in kickoff in which they often move around the map in pairs or 3's on defense but they aren't aggressive on defense which doesn't pair well with a team like 100t which are very aggressive and because they don't take space on attack by the time 100t are attacking the site the defense players don't have time to rotate since they only know where 100t are going before it's too late (bc they dont take map control). On attack mibr moves in 4's and 5's when they attack normally and they are pretty aggressive often entrying the site at 1:20-1:00 but it's not 100t level of aggression and since mibr doesn't often default 100t just takes so much map control that by the time they enter a site 100t is just there waiting because they already know what site mibr are pushing since they don't default and take too long to enter (this strat works fine against passive teams as these teams will just play retake most rounds which is what mibr are best at)
tldr: even with different igls the teams playstyle hasn't changed much and 100ts playstyle works very well against a team like mibr.
Discord