so would u call boaster a better igl and player than fns bc he has more trophies?

against 2 shit teams which are kru and furia so no wonder

ako?

actually rating does show round impact and clutches. It calculates the rating off the importance of a kill for example you would get more rating for a first blood or a kill in a 1v1, 3v3 ect.. than a 5v1 for example. clutches also improve the rating along with surviving assists and just so much more. Please learn how the rating system works before you talk shit about it.

For reference:
https://www.vlr.gg/160667/vlr-gg-player-rating-explained#:~:text=This%20rating%20system%20takes%20into,data%20that%20can%20be%20analyzed.

what? please speak english not american

you have to be on the zaza. Now your assuming they 100% confidence they will only win one game and lose in lower finals. If that happens sure they would make a roster change but I highly doubt that would happen and if it somehow was the case like ur post suggests and zellsis is the worst on c9 why would sen pick up a guy who is the worst on their team and are ranked 7th when ur story tells us sen would be ranked higher.
you must be on the zaza or dropped as a child

we are talking about this year not next year. this comment that you replied to said "next week" which is obvious this year and you said just fix the schelduing do im saying you can't do that when it's a week away. but if ur talking about next year then sure it's possible but I doubt it would happen

that team aint even making it to champs

if you delay champions even though they have already bought out the venue for specific days and have tickets for all their staffs members and people have already bought tickets. So I'm pretty sure it would cost riot over a million dollars to delay it if you take everything into account many of the previous buyers will have to be refunded and if they give them a ticket to the new day of champions then many won't be able to make it.

If you delay the lcq then there won't be time for those teams to make it to champions unless you delay it like a day or two days which won't really change anything. Also it would be unfair for teams who have been scrimming and vod reviewing and spending a lot of resources and time into reseraching another team who they were expected to face just for some ascension teams to get added into the lcq so the format would change.

tell us how you would do that

if emea and pacific got paid a full time salary for playing in tier 2 I'm pretty sure emea and pacific tier 2 would smoke NA

Somethings debut into sengoku gaming

NA education

one of these countries:
Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, The Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cabo Verde, Cambodia,Cameroon, Canada, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of the Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican, Republic, East Timor (Timor-Leste), Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, The Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kiribati, Korea, North, Korea, South, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Palau, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sudan, South, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Vatican City, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe

This took way too long to type out.

same for NA tho

ruined it. reported

spamming

bud thinks hes that guy

wrong thread bud

hmm I'm still hesitant. If this was 2022 or 2021 sure but they haven't really proved that much this year especially navi

not when this is ur pickem https://www.vlr.gg/pickem/22725d18

why have you made another thread with the same title and same message. Stop spamming dude

I did actually watch whzy play and he played nuts but you can't put them high up when you have only seem them do well in a single event.

oh oops i think I made a mistake I had them there when making it just above colombia

I'm not sure I even had russia at number one but changed it last minute just bc there are way more people from the US in tier 1 nowadays compared to 2021 and 2022. Russia is still a cracked region and having a russian import basically carries many teams.

alecks the goat

but they can't bc of riots rules which is why they are 2nd not first.

are you okay in the head?

virus don't click trust me guys

china looks very good but tokyo was their first even in which they even got a win. Just based off 1 good performance I ain't putting them high up. Argentina had some very good players and still have saadhack and Klaus which is why they are 19th.
Finland: Derke, Hoody, Jampi, Bonecold
Sweden: Leo, Zyppan, Sayf
I would rank Finland higher as they are also clearly better in tier 2 emea as well.
I do think I put thailand too low and philipines worse but I dont think they should be anywhere above that as they have fell off.

weber, soulcas, ardiis, boaster and mistic

Theres weber, soulcas, ardiis, boaster and mistic who are top 5 for brits and all well known

no?

doesnt matter if they are franchised when they have had 0 good performances even GE technically only has 2 indians

changed it. I guess i'm used to just saying oceania instead of australia

tell me ur top 15 or top 10

Ranking countries from best to worst in terms of valorant (not including regions but just countries). This is off all time and not based off this year alone.

1. USA

2. Russia

3. Brazil

4. Korea

5. Canada

6. Turkey

7. Chile

8. Finland

9. Sweden

10. United Kingdom(with ardiis)

11. China

12. Singapore

13. Japan

14. Indonesia

15. Poland

16. Philipines
    (Below this I'm not really sure about the rankings so I'll try my best).

17. Thailand

18. France

19. Argentina

20. Spain

21. Germany

22. Czech

23. Colombia

24. Denmark

25. Vietnam

26. Italy

27. Ukraine

28. Norway

29. Saudi Arabia

30. Egypt

31. Australia

32. Hong Kong

33. India

tell me if you agree or disagree and what parts you would change or if I missed any good countries.

oh oops I didnt even see it was a whole month ago wtf

wtf was kj doing

wait wdym?

currently china is prob above bc of edg but its based of "total performance" not most recent performance so sea > china

they are top 9 def not top 5. I could see them being better than talon and dfm but thats it. People in this thread seem to be delusional

the only comment with over 1 upvote in this post

you are so cheeky and clever, you got me there HAHAHAHAHAHA.

in order currently (not including most Chinese teams).
S: FNC
A: PRX, EG, NRG, EDG, TL, LOUD, DRX
B: NAVI, T1, C9, LEV, GENG, FUT, SECRET, GIANTS, 100T, SEN, FURIA, VIT, ZETA
C: BBL, RRQ, ASE, GE, KOI, KRU, TALON
D: TH, KC, MIBR, DFM

most braindead take ever. Why is drx 3rd what?
Heres an accurate top 5 in history

1. FNC: (fnc over optic). (Optic/envy/nrg) has 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th-8th, and 9th-12th which is an average placement of 3.57-4.42th whilst fnc has 1st, 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 5-8th. which is average off 3.25-4th at international events. both teams didnt qualify for one event for fnc it was masters berlin and for envy/optic it was masters Reykjavik in 2021. Also nrg don't look to good so far for this upcoming tournament whilst fnc are the favourites.
2. optic
3. loud
4. gambit
5. DRX
6. FPX

you are saying prime 100t (this was there peak moment in val history) beat acend and gambit whilst prime sen beat team vikings and fnc. YOU ARE COMPARING BOTH TEAMS IN THEIR PRIME AND SEN ARE DEF BETTER IN THEIR PRIME THAN 100T.

..

prime sen was by far the most dominate team while prime 100thieves has never been the best team ever and never in NA and they didn't beat prime acend and gambit but an upcoming one. sen are better than if your comparing primes

ik best in NA is mad lions