its bc he is fun to watch so people just glaze him even tho he aint good
| Flag: | Australia |
| Registered: | June 10, 2023 |
| Last post: | December 8, 2025 at 10:04 PM |
| Posts: | 8949 |
its bc he is fun to watch so people just glaze him even tho he aint good
1st seed is only bad for masters but it doesnt rlly matter for champs
i just didnt find t1 vs g2 enjoyable mainly bc it felt so flukey with the new tejo meta and teams not really knowing how to play properly. Just felt like the quality of val wasn't as high as the other grand finals in the past which affects the enjoyability of the tournament for me
kaajak zekken t3xture.
prob kaajak first
buddy i dont need random ahh advice from you, it just sounds privlidged and yeah I didnt realise it was the same person so my mistake there but my point still stands since #9 isnt wrong and so why would n1lf give a negative reply in #11 if he didnt disagree?
r u basing ur info off that stage 1 tiebracker?? bc there is another method that would end with the same result and its by doing it one by one and so in the 4 way tie bracker there is no clear winner for h2h so it goes to maps, rrq then win first seed from maps. then its a 3 way tiebracker by talon make 2nd seed bc they have clear h2h advantage and then final 2 h2h and t1 has that advantage.
this method is prob wrong but im just wondering if yk this for a fact or ur just basing it off stage 1 pacific
the latter is easily the more likely event
yeah but my point is that its possible for 100t to lose and yet still make first seed which u said was impossible in ur original post
yeah when i was thinking about it I wasnt sure if they would do it in rounds where its a subgroup h2h so u seperate teams based on how many h2hs they have won in the tiebracker or if they just sort the tiebracker with the entire context in mind
holy shit no way u are this dumb. the diff is +9 so 100t just can't go down more than 4. so if the scoreline is 13-5, 12-14, 9-13. and 100t loses then 100t have won a total of +2 rounds leaving them with +23 rounds and so they are above lev in rounds and tied on maps. and so in a 4 way tie where 100t loses to lev and nrg loses to kru then 100t would be first even tho they lost to lev.
r u restarted?? 100t are +21 and +3 on maps whereas lev are +12 and +1 on maps so if they win 1 map then they are tied on maps and so they just gotta make sure they dont lose many rounds
also 3 way tie is impossible, it would be a 4 way tie
how tho? if its a 4 way tie between lev nrg kru and 100t then wouldn't 100t be first off maps and rounds assuming they dont choke a lot of rounds
its h2h then its maps then round diffs in a 3 way tie
how does one choke a 10-1 lead ðŸ˜
bro raze has been meta on sunset wtf is this post
this just isnt it bro
roster lock, age, super expensive and its disrespectful towards 2g.
pacific
emea
americas
china
yeah I got setups but i just cant seem to win my games even when i perform well. this act is just hitting diff
chat how do i get out of asc, idk what to do
i get the clankers on my team in ranked as well i swear to god
only change for me was my audio being a bit buggy and going from 280fps to 310fps
aint no way u aren't aware
we just had waylay so no additional duelists for a bit
after h2h it comes down to maps then rounds and if they are still all tied then they play an additional match im pretty sure
(could be wrong)
So I'm pretty sure wolves have to beat nova, ag beats fpx and drg loses for wolves to qualify. if these 3 things dont happen then wolves cant qual
0/8 gotta try harder than that bro
eg won champs
fnc won lockin
fnc won 2nd masters (tokyo)
nah its better to go slightly above ur monitor refresh rate so for him 420 is better
so because FNC at their worse was worse than loud at their worse then they are automatically a worse team???? what kinda logic is that.
also its just not true, loud in 2022 bombed out of copenhagen which is way worse than FNCs worst achievemnt in 2023 which was coming 4th at champs
map 5????? there was no map 5 between nrg and loud.
also single elim doesnt automatically mean mickey mouse (especially when u get the top 4 teams anyway; fnc, loud, drx, navi). using the same logic then the 2021 masters and champs are mickey mouse.
for me I thought lotus and fracture were amazing maps that were def rewatchable
0.6??? I think you mean 0.06.
yeah its a big fucking difference, its the different between being placed 25th and being placed 13th at champs and 18th vs 9th at a masters.
every team has some sort of internal discourse and conflict, but I don't think many teams have it at the level where they are flaming teammates during the middle of the game. It's not just the players as well but also autumn who is flaming sylvan before the game has ended.
if u actually weight each international by the amount of rounds played then aspas has an international rating of 1.09 instead of 1.03. (would be higher if I included shanghai since he had a 1.15kd and 237 acs)
keep coping
loud 2022: 2nd, last, 1st
fnc 2023: 1st, 1st, 4th
tell me which is more impressive. Also fnc played in multiple metas whereas loud did that in just the same meta (chamber meta).
if we go just purely by players which is a very dumb way of doing it but I see people like you ranking teams by individual players fnc still comes out better.
Leo > sacy
boaster < panc
derke < aspas (2023 derke clears 2022 aspas tho).
alfa > less
chron > saadhak
u seriously not know how the new system work???