Trykan
Flag: Canada
Registered: August 12, 2021
Last post: November 13, 2024 at 9:55 PM
Posts: 264
1 2 3 4 •• 6

I love a fellow delusional C9 fan

posted 6 days ago

I think to introduce it, can just start with blind pick with 1 blind ban each per team (ie. both teams COULD ban the same agent)

posted 2 weeks ago

Guess the +vanity -vanity train for Cloud9 ends here

posted 2 weeks ago

Pro teams should learn economy management more. There have been too many times I see a team starting the round with 1 player at 7k and another at like 1k credits

posted 4 weeks ago

Surely you link clips to these :)

posted 4 weeks ago

I like Sliggy a lot, but he does need to have some energy sometimes when clutches happen

posted 1 month ago

This is what I meant, like they "earned" it instead of just invited

posted 1 month ago

C9 going international for the first time since franchising :)

posted 1 month ago

C9 -> Houston Rockets (Had some good deep playoff runs but recently is just building young core missing palyoffs)

posted 1 month ago

Imagine going +31 just to get dropped. Hope Krystal finds a good team

posted 1 month ago

Wait you said guaranteed tier 1 for 2 years minimum. Isn't it only 1 year and they have to maintain their spot to stay in the league

posted 2 months ago

The league NALCS finals back in like 2015 was held in Scotiabank. So probably there again

posted 2 months ago

Do you think that one or two signings are getting paid the 400k/year?
Granted there are additional staff like editors etc but what Riot get out of it is not worth the investment

posted 3 months ago

Damn

posted 3 months ago

Start with a 16 team swiss stage but 1st seed starts at 1-0 and 4th seed starts at 0-1
More incentive to be 1st seed. But 4th seed can still play at minimum 2 games

posted 4 months ago

allat

posted 4 months ago

Since EDG and FPX are the top 2 in points and one of the two are guaranteed to go to Champs (Given that the lowest they can possibly place together is 3rd and 4th). If one qualifies as a 3rd place seed, the other one will qualify based off of points.

posted 4 months ago

They need a way to incentivize teams to always keep trying. If we didn't include Stage 1 games into champs performance then teams would just give up after losing 2 games in Stage 1. Obviously would be better if we had LCQ but having it based overall performance in the year is a good thing

posted 4 months ago

Agreed, they're trying to build to actually be able to win a LAN instead of just attending every single one and bombing out

posted 4 months ago

If were going legacy here Hamilton >> Verstappen (give him a few more years to catch up with his recent dominance)

posted 4 months ago

how did leaf get snaked? I just thought C9 was doing a paycut for everyone at the time

posted 4 months ago

C9, the best regular season team and biggest chokers in playoffs

Also oxygen cause Mitch (Ex C9)

posted 5 months ago

Like the NRG team, just came crawling back

posted 5 months ago

wait do they actually? thats crazy that Madrid gave basically nothing then

posted 6 months ago

But it would be map differential, so a 2-0 would make the differential same as Heretics

posted 6 months ago

While this is fair, would you really want a team that goes 1-4 (20% WR) to make playoffs? Doesn't seem fair for a team on the otherside who likely goes 3-3 (50% WR) in this case to miss playoffs.

posted 6 months ago

To be fair, they probably didn't see Yay/Vanity lineup working for a championship (honestly might've worked) so financially why pay so much to someone if they're going to be mid when you can pay another guy (some T2 player) a lot less to achieve slightly worse results.

Still they shouldn't have paid Yay that much to begin with if they were going to falter so soon

posted 6 months ago

I know Pacific has a 2 win minimum for a team to qualify for playoffs, does Americas have the same rule?

posted 6 months ago

They really opened the floodgates

posted 7 months ago

I mean ACEND won 2021 Champions and they have a quite small presence

posted 7 months ago

I get that you want to give the 1st seed the advantage, but like why not make the 2/3rd matches a double elimination to qualify into the other 2 spots. This might cause the same issue where the 2nd and 3rd place team from the same side of the bracket might just be better. Double elimination is where its at

posted 7 months ago

care*

posted 7 months ago

I just remember this thing that Steel said that his strat on 100T when they played was to find the site Cned was on and to hit the other site

posted 7 months ago

Please remove Vanity, he hasn't done anything for this org in any of his 10,000 stints

posted 7 months ago

Unfortunate for your bank

posted 7 months ago

yes but also KC said that they had like 104 scrim wins with no losses at some point didn't they?

posted 7 months ago

Good b8

posted 7 months ago

I feel like walkouts in general have been not as hype this masters. Feel like the lack of Boaster/Benkai just changes it

posted 7 months ago

Assuming the right matches for 3rd place won, the addition of teams like NRG, FNC, DRX and TE would be crazy

posted 7 months ago

can anyone explain why icy is so good? Im looking at his stats and its nothing crazy like what

posted 7 months ago

o7

posted 7 months ago

Unfortunate for EDG, always want to see them prosper. Loud just too good right now

posted 7 months ago

wait but GenG won

posted 8 months ago

All first seeds won, so no interregional matchups :)

posted 8 months ago

I guess it makes sense, that's what's left of the core that played last year

posted 8 months ago

Looking at the way Riot treated League's gamemode shows the poor future of Valorant's gamemodes having any creativity

posted 8 months ago

this would be so funny

posted 11 months ago

Okobotro 🗿

posted 11 months ago
1 2 3 4 •• 6