SenTones
Flag: Mexico
Registered: September 3, 2022
Last post: September 5, 2022 at 5:16 PM
Posts: 17

It is preferable to see the strong destroy their group, to be eliminated at the beginning and the entire final is the strongest against a weak who came by luck.

posted about 2 years ago

Not really, a team without synergy does not work even with the highest individual level and the best coach. The coach himself said how the players simply ignore him. Not thinking as a team gives you a free mind to try new things alone, sometimes shit that works out of luck. In the case of furia, there is no coach to fix them, in the case of LOUD I don't think a bad job is done.

posted about 2 years ago

.

posted about 2 years ago

waiting for false accusations of racism by dgzin

posted about 2 years ago

Yes, my approach was that they didn't know how to recover, they didn't adapt and they arrived at the next map with a low spirit, just to troll. My fear was that they would swallow another 13-3 as against leviathan and optic. But they did just that in the second game, they shut me up, and I'm happy about that.

posted about 2 years ago

Well, they were showing a pattern of being very mood dependent, they generally put up a fight on the first map and if they come back like that, they get trampled on the next ones.

They stood their ground until the end, I spoke ahead of time, they've shut my ass even if they lose.

In fact, if they correct, I think they can win by lower bracket.

posted about 2 years ago

Well, they were showing a pattern of being very mood dependent, they generally put up a fight on the first map and if they come back like that, they get trampled on the next ones.

They stood their ground until the end, I spoke ahead of time, they've shut my ass even if they lose.

In fact, if they correct, I think they can win by lowering.

posted about 2 years ago

But E-xolos played in the same or even worse conditions, if they agreed to play in equality it is valid, the difference is that they adapted better. They have a monstrous level to always eat the champion of the last world championship, but they lower the level every time they stop feeling comfortable. They lack the discipline that Lev is displaying.

posted about 2 years ago

I am not saying that they are magically bad, they made the cut against the former champion and there is already merit, but they continue to make the same mistakes, if the firepower fails them they do not know how to proceed and they give away easy rounds, their spirits collapse and they do nonsense. They lost 0 3 against lev in qualifying and 0 2 against e xolos, a lower division team...

My point is that they lower the level every time rounds get complicated.

posted about 2 years ago

In latam we love them all, but it is not nice to give the thumbs up and have them spit on you, we are rude to those who are rude first. The keznit incident, he was taken as a villain when he defended himself and they tried to ruin his career... We laugh at the latam haters when we see them cry, but other than that we respect the region and support their teams when ours don't play. I'm happy for dgzin's defeat, but I'm sorry for qck, Mazin, the boludo Nozwerr and mainly Khalil, very nice guy.

posted about 2 years ago

What I said, a team that was dominant but fails to adapt and grow, stagnates while the other teams outperform it...

posted about 2 years ago

That's what I mean, Na is a step above, but not more than 3.

posted about 2 years ago

Furia is probably the weakest rival, I don't argue with you, the coach himself didn't expect them to qualify because although there is skill, there is no synergy, he doesn't know very well what to do with them and they don't even listen to him. But Loud, Lev and Krü? Lev already ate XSET when they just changed player and coach, and they come 3 tiers up. I think they can also against 100T keeping in mind that they were stomped by xset, Optic is the only one who sometimes trolling but is unstoppable when they play at 100%. Come on, the exception. OPTIC is the dominant one, not NA in general, and also they are very emotional, inconsistent, it's enough that they don't give their 100 and they fall third like last time.

posted about 2 years ago

I don't know where you get that the player base is lower but I'm sure it's not like that... there has been a rise in popularity of E sports both in latam and Br.

And both Latam and Br have already shown that they are not behind in the competitive level, they may not win the final but they are always in the quarterfinals, making it difficult for the champion.

Br has a sure one while South Latam and North Latam fight for just 1 slot and then North Latam, South Latam and br fight for 2 more.
It seems a lot to you 4 slots for 3 semi-regions and then 2 countries have 3 insured.

In fact, being fair, America being a continent... it is an exaggeration to have 7 spaces and Europe only 3. They should remove a space from Na to be 2 per semi region and give another space to Europe.
Or join Na with latam north, and latam south with br, to be 3 slots south america and 3 north america.

posted about 2 years ago

You cannot take an exception to the rule as the norm, yes, Na and Eu have one or two strong teams, maybe the best in the world, but a winner does not represent the general level, the rest of the league is full of weak teams. And not to mention the rate of players outside teams, any external player comes to Na and Eu to stomp the ranks in the radiant top 100. Europe, due to the mix of languages and cultures, easily has one of the poorest levels and full of trolls in the non-professional competition.

posted about 2 years ago

The game is much easier than cs go at a mechanical level, yes, it depends more on luck too. But that doesn't matter, because there is still a lot of skill dependency, if the game is easier for you then for the enemy. If the enemy is better, he will destroy you regardless of the difficulty of the game, in a competitive game the difficult thing is to win the rival and not the game. So at the end of the day, it's just as hard.

posted about 2 years ago

Because the regional gap is an effect of factors that did not occur in valorant, it is not a cause or a fact.
In fact, the regional gap is currently almost a myth, it is more of a temporal and sample gap, the games that Eu and Na are superior at are the ones that... the rest of the world doesn't care about or have been playing for much less.

Because it is a new game with global success, just as popular all over the world and with the same opportunities. We are in a globalized world, it is not like 20 years ago where each town exchanged strats in lans and each region had its playstyle and super marked level. Internet allows you to have the strast and mechanics from all over the world within minutes of being discovered, in turn to practice online against many more people, and finally many official confrontations between regions.

To believe in a gap at the regional level boundary today is quite naive.

What has happened in other games is the experience and the player base, competing at a high level is relatively new in Latin America, for example, in fact, the popularization of video games was the same as in the USA and Europe, where it went from being a ''thing of geeks'' to a means of entertainment for the general public but decades later... It's not that there was no talent, there just weren't hardly any people trying. Currently there is internet and computers even in the most remote and poor towns, living from video games is an acceptable aspiration, and in fact the quarantine got a lot of people into video games.

But most peopple are not going to try hard old games no matter how classic they are.

So valorant taken the mature E Sports in the most part of the world, with the largest possible playerbase, and where the whole world has the same start and the same opportunity.

Valorant doesn't have that big regional gap because, it's almost as if the world were a single region.

posted about 2 years ago