Just want to comment here.
There is no need for roster changes when organisations are in it for the long run. Sure, a lot of tier one teams were beaten by talents. But don't forget that these teams all have results to back up their skill. In the future, when top teams have time to develop to opponents that are rather unpredictable, we'll see a lot better results.
With that being said, there's nothing wrong with the roster of Liquid, G2 or Fnatic.
Starting with G2:
They're a top team that had an amazing run in almost every tournament that has ever been held thus far, their potential to achieve greatness is unlimited thanks to the skill of the players.
Liquid:
Sure, benching your IGL and signing a CS player that has barley had any time to adjust to the VALORANT environment is rather questionable. But the way I see it, if you give Jamppi two months to get used to the style and feel of the game and if he really wants to put in the effort Liquid will reign supreme once again.
Fnatic:
They have amazing results against top teams, good tournament finishes and most of all they're PUTTING IN THE WORK.
To summarize, these organisations couldn't give a single crap if the teams qualified or not. From a company prespective, they like to see things long-term. They believe that the players that they've signed have the potential to improve to such an extent that they will infact be a top contendor. And ALL these teams have the potential, it's just up to them to put in the work.