SEN_brasileiros
Flag: Malta
Registered: May 22, 2023
Last post: October 5, 2024 at 6:19 AM
Posts: 1262
1 2 3 4 5 6 •• 24

bro entire LEV squad speak Portuguese, and Portuguese;Spanish are both similar you just need to train you ear and learn some words lol

posted about a year ago

I do not think it is xenophobia when 4 players speak the same language then they need to speak English cuz one player lol, LEV is kinda fucked if their core is not fluent.

When BR come to NA they needed to speak English and not force the whole roster to speak english because one

posted about a year ago

Pretty sure he would be playing Viper or Astra.

posted about a year ago

Nah.
Roles are fine since they can train it during off season

posted about a year ago

No.
If I can profit somehow from this "dating" so maybe.
Marriage is just impossible and I do not want to being guilty of bringing a child into the world who has a mother with OnlyFans.

Learn Life.

posted about a year ago

ofc man would date hot woman, but marrying? hell nah.
its your turn to smash, do it. :D

tu n deve se importar pq tu taria em volta de gente perdedora, namorar com mina assim tu ganha 0 respeito de alguém, vai ser zoado pro resto da vida e vai ficar falando "o amor vale mais" feito um otario

posted about a year ago

None.
Learn Life.

posted about a year ago

G.

posted about a year ago

https://gyazo.com/e9a0b7855d370a7af29e9e9cc74c2ed6

cancel culture never fail

posted about a year ago

Nah bro, don't even try to argue they just cannot comprehend at all.
What we consider wrong would be if pancc taken initiative.

posted about a year ago

It doesn't work like that, It is considered if less than 15.
15 or more is not considered at all, but if less than 18 he cannot record or save or do anything like that. (It's only legal IRL, not on Internet)
The crime he was going to commit was "harassment" or "Importunity" if he sent something like that to that girl, but since he didn't.

The one who claimed that was another girl, not the one who made the allegations

posted about a year ago

¯_(ツ)_/¯

posted about a year ago

mad cuz he is losing one possible slot kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
even washed koala who wanted guard to lose their spot is replying kkkkkkkkkkkkk
both washed 🌪️🌪️🌪️

posted about a year ago

#MeToo #BelieveWomen

posted about a year ago

Yeah, It's immoral.
I would also hate him if he was the ONLY one to start it, so It would make sense to "cancel him" and fuck his job.

posted about a year ago

I see, but that doesn't explain much since she also took the initiative, so there's no exploration at all.

I just think that there's a huge difference between people on high school x people on university in US, in Brazil there's not that much at all since here is pretty much common to people around this age to be friends, for example people around 15-16 do some "course training" to SAT (in Brazil is called ENEM) with other people around 18-23y.
So it's very common for people to have friendships at these ages, I can already see that this is something quite impossible in the United States since normally you won't be in the same environment as someone that age.

posted about a year ago

I agree, It's being annoying af and I'm not even trying to defend him at all, ppl just don't understand what I'm trying to explain

posted about a year ago

Like, In Brazil people consider it if kids but not teenager 15+ at all. You're using this term based on what US law consider as it.
I just can't understand that how can someone 16 years old give consent to someone 18 and not give consensus to someone 22?

As I said, it would be considered wrong if pancc had taken initiative but he did not (cuz age gap) that's what most brazilians view at ped
If he had taken the initiative to want or insist on someone at that age, then yes.
But since both were flirting, I consider it more "acceptable" but still immoral.

posted about a year ago

I received some threatening DMs.

posted about a year ago

I'm just trying to understand what the difference would be between someone 16 and 18 to date in the US, do you guys consider it wrong?
So in you guys head 16 dating 18, 16 can consent
But if 16 date someone 20 can't consent?

It just makes no sense to me at all, thats my point.

posted about a year ago

✞ I'm being misunderstood, I'm not defending him. ✞

posted about a year ago

So explain, 16 can talk with 18?

posted about a year ago

21.

posted about a year ago

So, 16 can't do anything sexual?

As I said again bro, it would be WRONG if he taken action SOLO, but both were flirting. :l
If he took action solo, or insisted or asked why she rejected him, then I would consider it wrong.

16 dating 18 for you is legal right? but 16 to 22 is not cuz 16 cannot consent? it just makes no sense at all...

posted about a year ago

you consider US law more morally correct by your values.
but as I said, on my conception to be wrong what he did he had taken the initiative alone, and not both.

In Brazil It's also morally wrong, but It would be morally wrong if he taken the initiative solo. Since both were flirting and nobody cares at all ig.

posted about a year ago

bro, thats US law........
u braindead
here 15+ can consent.

why americans keep using their law to explain things? wtf

posted about a year ago

its my time to shine!!

posted about a year ago

Eles consideram isso pq nos EUA tem uma diferença enorme entre as pessoas que estão no colegial x faculdade
aqui no Brasil n tem tanta diferença que muita tem amizade com pessoal de todas as idades, quando eles veem essa diferença de 4-5 anos eles já pensam que foi manipulada ou algo do gênero pq na cultura deles n tem como alguém mais velho conhecer alguem mais novo, já aq no BR oq tu mais vê é pessoal de 16-17 em festas com pessoal de 19-20 anos.

posted about a year ago

nah, its both. you're just being biased over her. 16yo is not innocent and dumb at all bro, wtf.
you're acting like pancc manipulated and "forced" as I said he never did that at all, if you read their texts he never insisted on anything, he just asked it since both were flirting, when girl said no he just accepted and moved on.

posted about a year ago

bro tf........ 😭

posted about a year ago

I'm not defending him, I just said that that the girl has some fault too because she really knew what she was doing, flirting, and in the end she just said that "It was a test" as an excuse.
Now, if she hadn't been flirting with him and he had asked that and if he has the only one to take initiative, then yes, I would consider it wrong.

Is that hard to understand? :l

posted about a year ago

nah bro, brazil is not US where there's a huge disparity maturity between 16 and 22, 16 and 22 people here frequent the same environment, parties, etc. It's not the same in the USA.
I know in US someone 16 would hardly met someone older, but in Brazil is just too common these things and there is no difference between freshmen and things like that in the USA.

I'm not defending him, I just said that that the girl has some fault too because she really knew what she was doing, flirting, and in the end she just said that "It was a test" as an excuse.
Now, if she hadn't been flirting with him and he had asked that and if he has the only one to take initiative, then yes, I would consider it wrong.

posted about a year ago

she was 15 when they met bro virtually, when it happened she was 16 he 21-22, also i'm not saying thats creepy because he NEVER insisted on it. When she rejected him he just accepted and chill. He asked this as they BOTH flirted.
The girl literally hit on him and used the excuse that she was doing it to "test" to see how far he would go, thats bs excuse to clear her side and come out as innocent.
both fault, not only pancc.

pls use ur brain hooman

posted about a year ago

cry is free

posted about a year ago

what US law says lmao, if they consider 18, its 18
if they consider 16, its 16.

posted about a year ago

cry is free

posted about a year ago

bro u consider him pedo as US law based in 18yo.

posted about a year ago

Americans trying to use their Law to ban a BR player lol

posted about a year ago

Yeah. Thanks for truth.

posted about a year ago

That's fake.
Another girl clammed it, not the one who exposed him. (No proof too)

posted about a year ago

LEV aspas + LEV havoc

its over

posted about a year ago

I'm tyrannosaurus rex, so I'm nb even if I eat woman. :D

posted about a year ago

cashcow channel on rise kkkkk

posted about a year ago

:D

posted about a year ago

his contract ended 2 months before ascension, he choose to not play because if he extended with Union, LOUD(any Tier 1 team)would need to buyout, making his chance low to be picked up.

personal issue is bullshit, more like excuse.

posted about a year ago

nah bro
I just said that if Les was a girl and the way Sacy treated him, Sacy would have been canceled for his life.
It's just too much difference, we treat man and woman different.

posted about a year ago

MeL cannot replace anyone, sadly.

Imagine if she had Sacy as teammate.. "Sacy is toxic, I'll go to court against him!"
Also, too hard to be harsh against woman because she 100% would cry and tell things to her bf, making even more beef.
Any other pro player would be called misogynist or some shit if they argue or complain too much
Males are already used to this scenario of competition since childhood, its our instinct.
Status, conquer, fame.
Mix = male scene, accept this fucking fact.

posted about a year ago

Top G

posted about a year ago

truthear hola is the best IEM for low price, good sound, good for fps.

posted about a year ago

EU is better because it's more balanced, balanced doesn't mean that its easier than NA.

When you are too good, you will be able to gain more advantage from balanced matches overall, so you rank up faster than in NA.

posted about a year ago
1 2 3 4 5 6 •• 24