this has been known:
https://www.vlr.gg/user/dort is kyedae
| Flag: | Mexico |
| Registered: | June 16, 2022 |
| Last post: | July 8, 2025 at 9:09 AM |
| Posts: | 6798 |
2015 ScreaM was beautiful, 2024 ScreaM is hot
APAC, China, Turkey, Brazil/LATAM, NA, EU, JP in that order
no, they're swiftplays only edaters and bronzes play them
its a swiftplay bro I swear to you I could get the same stats in the same amount of games
Russian government pays me 50k rubles per 100 people I misinform on twitter
The fact that this is happening at the same time as GC champs pisses me off
It feels impossible to not gender characters in spanish, while also trying to keep up with the game
SEN: Star player just retired, signed as many big names as possible trying to fill in the gap. More likeable org. Has the next GOAT in training (Lamine Yamal = Reduxx). Many ups and downs throughout career
NRG: Signed the galacticos (made a superteam) in 2024, failed, and now made a better team which still has 4 stars but also FNS to call. prestigious since 2023 (since 2021/2022 if you count the NV/optic era)
Are you a sprayer or a tapper?
Sprayer: neptune
Tapper: araxys
looking at total results I think B tier is just the wildcard tier, while C tier is rosters that most likely aren't gonna accomplish anything next year
everyone in S tier feels accurate ngl good job vlr
also fnatic keeps flipping between A and S tier which I think is accurate to its position compared to heretics and vitality
Why are you crying about this 'offseason game no one cares about' then? just let kaplan cook lol
NRG puts Verno on sentinel so FNS can call better on ini = good
SEN puts N4rrate on sentinel so johnqt can call better on ini = bad
why? bc NRG beat SEN and delusional sen fans need a scapegoat besides the players they idolize
I think in sports like soccer it's hard to get as many reps in practicing anything in particular unless you're literally in Real Madrid's training facilities with a team of hired athletes to help you individually.
In esports we have aim trainers, the ability to queue into a ranked match any time we want, custom games to try kits out, etc.
So the fact that players like Messi can become so skilled at dribbling past defenders and scoring wondergoals--winning 5+ ballon d'ors over the course of a decade (with his physical ability declining with age moreso than a league players) is still more impressive to me.
But compared to like Usain Bolt, where the sport in question is just "pure mechanics" in esports term, having been blessed with insane genetics and realizing the potential he had with them--I think Faker's feat is more impressive
Depends on the sport.
I would say it's arguably harder to stay on top in an esport as complicated as league throughout multiple metas, different characters, etc. and where mechanics are almost the same at the very top...
than it is in olympic sprinting: Usain Bolt was born with tremendous talent and potential that he realized, that 99% of the world will never have access to--which ended with him never even getting close to losing a race
I'm not saying he should retire. I'm saying bro is already at his peak--and a damn good one at that, as he was the best player on NRG last year.
He's the only reason they almost won against madrid-bound sentinels
Of all the players to say need a few more years, you say Ethan...?
Knowing EG they're just gonna put him in a prison jumpsuit and call it a day
only 51 first bloods? over how many games
This phenomenon happens every year:
-Worlds anthem comes out
-Everyone calls it shit
-2 months pass
-Everyone loves it now
the closest i got to one of those achievements was sunset invasion in terms of difficulty
you clearly don't know anything about chess if you think it's about memorization and algorithms--especially in the top level, and especially at blitz chess
there's 2 and they're both above benjyfishy and valyn
maybe respond to the 2nd paragraph where I disprove the "evidence" from the book he's quoting? LMAO
So long as I can get idiots who pretend to have science backing up their prejudices to admit they're full of shit I am happy :)
Very scientific of you!
So you don't have anything, got it :)
I'll take a second to reply if you actually find a quote--i'm in a 10 mans
You're gonna have to give me a quote on the first one: I don't have access to it
As for the second:
"Trying to assign exact percentages to the relative contributions of “culture” versus “biology” to the behavior of free-living human individuals in a complex social environment is tough at best. Halpern offers a succinct assessment: 'The role of culture is not zero. The role of biology is not zero.'"
The author admits a degree of error that can be attributed to socio-cultural factors, and not innate biology on the nature of their findings. There's no absolute certainty
Too much ego to admit I'm wrong? I'm responding to everything you're saying in a timely fashion, please stop projecting your insecurities. I can see why you insist that rats are identical to humans if you're basing it off of what you see in the mirror every day
Care to actually cite something from one of those articles that backs that point up, rather than pretending it's in there somewhere, buddy?
Discord