Wouldve won with Zombs honestly
Flag: | Netherlands |
Registered: | May 15, 2021 |
Last post: | November 22, 2024 at 3:48 PM |
Posts: | 1958 |
Wouldve won with Zombs honestly
Chronicle for flex deserves a shout
Now yes. But there will not be 2 OG
Oh no a player is beating me with a gun that's available to everyone
Its not just a Valorant issue, its just a (English speaking) streamer issue. Twitch is so boring for EU people during the day, you have to wait for NA people to wake up or stay up really late to get some decent, big streamer content.
If anything Acend literally proves not to look at past performances. Champions in 2021 and unlikely to feature at all in the 2022 season. So recent performances aren't a reliable thing to choose on, but other stuff in the organization is
Then AS Monaco would make more sense, since they are already partner with Gambit for Dota
Just watch his streams, its not hard to figure out why people think he isn't a likable person
Karmine Corp vs ZETA
Valorant already at 2018 CSGO level. 15 year old game vs 2 year old
No its worse (so far). No Zeta hurt big
M1 416k avg | 600k max https://escharts.com/tournaments/valorant/vct-2022-stage-1-masters-reykjavik
M2 300k avg | 1M max https://escharts.com/tournaments/valorant/vct-2022-stage-2-masters-copenhagen
there never was a point of having an academy team at this stage tbh (from org perspective, obviously for players its nice to get paid and trained)
but GenG got a round further
Yea if those leagues have good competition, livestreams and money pools then orgs and players would still be interested to stay. Gives players a chance to get scouted
VRL has been good. But have you seen the groups for the winners, put the strongest leagues in 1 group…
BBG Update video Owner hints at Riot setting up a Domestic league, which could be good for the T2 scene everyone is unsure about
Ever since assmapudy took over they lost every match against a on paper similar level or better team
but it will not really, its like watching the NA/EMEA group stages before qualifying to a Masters. But without the endless qualifier rounds, that get no views. Plus we will see teams get the best players from orgs that won't make it, making their teams even better. So actually good players against good players.
The first year of "franchising"/partnerships will be the best. After that we will see if it has effect on T2 talent coming through
Thing is, how do you create regional leagues in the US? West vs East? CAN vs USA vs MEX? Most orgs are based in LA, Texas or NY I think
Deep shit? elaborate on that. CIS obviously got fucked, but that's not a blame to Riot or the competition.
You think they would've stayed if it was the same format as now for the next seasons? Feel like the current EMEA set up is best for keeping T2 orgs in the game. But even then there will be orgs dropping out anyway
Not just screaming, he is doing it while complaining
tell me how a wider reach of audience is terrible for sponsors
Mitch is just screaming
It is kinda weird timing to say it's not possible anymore, probably don't want to have potential politic drama/stuff in the future. First players have a nation flag, then city flag, then other types of flags
but doesn't this also mean their prep isn't good?
owner ---- kicked ???
yea, but why not let the #1 play against each other for the qualified spot
its just weird that their spot is based on NIP performance
Top 3 in the first masters, then it went downhill quick. Especially with the new coach they have been ass. Gen G does have a decent performing GC team and did a GC tournament recently, so maybe that helps. I don't think Riot will look at how good a team is now, when partnerships are for a few years. And everything will change in the team with transfers when that new league comes, so they have a better chance of getting better players.
But there are like 5/6 teams that are basically lock in's for NA anyway (SEN, 100T, OpTic, C9, TSM), unlikely they will get in. They have to fight with NRG, XSET, FaZe, V1
source?
Because it just looks pretty seeded. Paper Rex (4) & Leviathan (3) are lowest placed seed play against winner out of groups, Fnatic & XSET are highest against second place, with Fnatic in top because 1st seed and XSET 2nd =bottom. Winner group A in top, winner group B in bottom. Second group B in top and second group A in bottom.
thought that happened based on last season, not just last tournament. Same way Riot decided the amount of teams each region could send, based on last season
Its already top 8, that's not early. It just feels that way because there are not that many teams. The simple swap trick would nullify all reason to have seeds, which brings a bigger issue with it because why would you even care in qualifiers then.
But also people are overreacting because OpTic isn't even guaranteed to win.