Lamo
Flag: United States
Registered: October 29, 2021
Last post: November 28, 2021 at 5:03 AM
Posts: 39

gg

posted about 3 years ago

not csgay for sure

posted about 3 years ago

ok

posted about 3 years ago

CSG OMEGALUL player, who cares

posted about 3 years ago

not a CSG OMEGALUL player so csgo frogs wont care

posted about 3 years ago

CSG OMEGALUL

posted about 3 years ago

the animation is so bad

posted about 3 years ago

yeah that's not how it works. 16 teams is low enough as it is for 50% to be from weak regions. Maybe if it had 32 teams like the World Cup you can have space for smaller scenes.

posted about 3 years ago

except EU does not have a uniform fanbase lol. By this logic Spanish scene gets it own slot, French scene get their own slot and so on. Besides 1 slot for CIS is obviously way too low.

posted about 3 years ago

That scenes can grow in the Masters events. There's no need to make space for development of scenes in the biggest Valorant event.

posted about 3 years ago

yeah so the record will change from 0-12 to 1-16. Not a huge difference, is there?

posted about 3 years ago

yeah so 3-4 slots should be given to such regions, not 50% of the slots. Besides, smaller teams from NA and EMEA would be a underdog story as well, like Cloud9

posted about 3 years ago

SEA + KR + JP getting a guaranteed 4 slots should be much worse than EMEA having more than 4 slots, using your own example.

posted about 3 years ago

Ok if not 95%, there's still a 85% chance they're losing to NA/EMEA teams. And if 50% of the teams have a 85% chance of losing to the other 50% of teams, that should not be the case for the biggest Valorant event.

posted about 3 years ago

they're already getting plenty of exposure at Masters events.

you love to see a fairytale run or a crazy underdog story

Yeah that should be done by underdogs beating good teams. Not by a SEA team getting to the playoffs because they beat other average teams from Japan and Brazil

posted about 3 years ago

just because players in CSGO did not have many opportunities does not mean half of the spots in the biggest Valorant event should be given for development of regions instead of giving it to the best teams.

posted about 3 years ago

it's not fresh and exciting if half of the teams are there with a 95% chance of losing to NA/EMEA teams

posted about 3 years ago

4 teams is most definitely NOT enough for EMEA, you can see orgs in EMEA are not investing anywhere as much as orgs in other regions (except Turkey)

posted about 3 years ago

Or you can leave masters for developing the regions and have champions for the best of the best, or have some other better alternative.. No reason to jump to conclusions like this.

posted about 3 years ago

8/16 spots at Champions go to teams that have collectively never won a match against EMEA/NA opponents(Record for non-kr/emea/na vs emea/na teams is 0-12). Don't you guys think these regions get way too many spots? Especially SEA having 2 guaranteed spots and a third spot being taken by Full Sense. I think having 8/16 teams more or less having a 95% chance of losing every time they face a EMEA/NA teams is a bad idea for the biggest Valorant event.

posted about 3 years ago

Boaster is extremely cringe

posted about 3 years ago

super bland and predictable

posted about 3 years ago

yeah ur right, i notice in csgo there's a lot less shit flying around

posted about 3 years ago

well val production is much better but observing is a lot behind

posted about 3 years ago

Im not

posted about 3 years ago

This is my first time watching csgo, but csgo observing is way better than val observing, why is that?

posted about 3 years ago