Hirit
Flag: South Korea
Registered: March 16, 2024
Last post: July 25, 2024 at 11:15 PM
Posts: 3

What I can currently say is

  1. Both the person who wrote the expose and the player being mentioned are legally “minors.”
  2. And the pair “had a consensual relationship.”
    This case is a matter between the two individuals. This is not something that goes so far as to call the player a “rapist.”
  3. And DRX is an Esports team that operates several sports.
    Last year, in DRX League of Legends, a player was exposed as a false pregnancy. In the end, the ex-girlfriend ran away after it was discovered that the "pregnancy test" was a fake photo taken from Google.
  4. At that time, the incident occurred and DRX spent the season without the club releasing a statement (the revelation occurred at the beginning of the season).
  5. During that time, the players, team, and fans had a really difficult time.

Therefore, I have a “neutral” view of this incident.
Following the DRX League of Legends player incident and the Sinatra player incident in VALORANT, I think the answer is to watch and wait "neutrally" rather than viewing this incident with regret from one side.

posted 1 month ago

you're right. The person who posted the current post made a ridiculous remark about being a “rapist” for an incident that has not yet been clearly revealed, and if it is really “rape,” you can go to the police station and have them legally judged. However, the exposer cannot actually go to the police station. because? This is because he said, “It is a moral issue, not a legal issue.” I wonder if the personal lives of a man and a woman should be brought up to this level.

posted 1 month ago

왜 당신이 한쪽 주장만 듣고 한 선수를 "강간범" 으로 만드는거죠? 이런 사건은 한쪽 주장만 듣는게 아니라 양쪽 입장을 들어봐야하는게 맞는거고
정작 당신이 말한 "강간" 이라면 경찰소에 가서 고소를 하면 되는데 왜 고소는 못하는거죠? 진짜 말도 안되는 날조를 하고있네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ

posted 1 month ago