CowboySG
Flag: United States
Registered: March 13, 2022
Last post: August 25, 2024 at 11:19 AM
Posts: 470
1 •• 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sen was 10x better in double duelist meta. Rn with this meta, they are a t2 team

posted about 2 years ago

It's not any one player's fault. It's all of them. Their team play has been beyond atrocious. I guess you could blame shaz the most since he's igl, but overall they all deserve blame.

posted about 2 years ago

Overrated would be if he didn't do that. Ever since zombs was dropped, he has been the next "sen has to drop" player. Sen would be so much worse without him.

posted about 2 years ago

Going back to Champs he's had so many rounds where he willed Sen to winning them.

posted about 2 years ago

Going back to champions, dapr has helped cover up so many of sen's issues.

posted about 2 years ago

Dapr has gotten so much hate, but he's honestly so underrated.

posted about 2 years ago

If viewers was everything sentinels would be going to copenhagen

posted about 2 years ago

I think this is the reason NA is so much more balanced than EU rn (Balanced doesn't mean better before you guys flame me).

posted about 2 years ago

Who from Brazil is gonna knock Loud down here?

posted about 2 years ago

Lost the confidence they had in stage 1. Letting the pressure getting to them as a young team. Their executes and retakes are significantly worse than they were in stage 1 as well. They also aren't boot camping like they were in stage 1.

posted about 2 years ago

Might be the reverse actually. Group A gonna finish with a 3 way tie for 2nd regardless of who wins.

posted about 2 years ago

If Ghost wins and Optic loses this weekend, that's a first round banger of a matchup

posted about 2 years ago

Yeah, but almost no way Sen does a roster swap and LG isn't gonna want to just have a couple players replace them.

posted about 2 years ago

That Ghost pick not looking that far off. LG too, but not sure how losing their org is gonna hurt them.

posted about 2 years ago

Kru has one bad Masters (They lost to Optic and Liquid as well), and everyone shitting on LATAM.

posted about 2 years ago

Lumi already has the spot on lock. If they dropped out of LCQ then Sen is guaranteed in. However, I think Lumi plays in LCQ as an independent team.

posted about 2 years ago

Let me put it in terms of math.

Stage 1 Last Place got 10 points
Stage 1 8th Place got 30 points

Rise = 10
Sen = 30

Stage 2 Last place gets 15 points, 5th in groups get 20.
Stage 2 8th place (playoffs made) gets 35 points.

Faze = 10 + 35 (min) = 45 (min)
Sen = 30 + 15 (or 20) = 45 (or 50)

Faze wins tiebreaker over Sen, so C9 loss means Faze is ahead of Sen.

posted about 2 years ago

He forgot that Faze gets Rises points lol

posted about 2 years ago

Wrong

A first round Faze loss with a C9 loss ties them at 45. Most recent points get the nod so Faze gets in. Only way Sen gets in if they lose to C9 is if Ghost loses first round (Which is 2 straight losses btw.)

posted about 2 years ago

C9 have nothing to lose in the game, so Sen better be drilled and ready to win

posted about 2 years ago

It's the fact that Guard didn't have to play groups that really is making this bad. We just need one team to make top 8 that isn't optic though and the guard may get bumped to LCQ.
This will also favor G2 in EMEA.

posted about 2 years ago

In a perfect world 100T and Ghost join Optic in Champs. I like both of them a lot

posted about 2 years ago

The C9 vs. Sen game is the biggest last place game ever played lol

posted about 2 years ago

Depends if Sentinels beats C9, then one of those teams going out first round gets them in. Their game against C9 is basically a must win though

posted about 2 years ago

The guard still are in a good spot because of stage 1. Best case scenario for them, Optic makes Copenhagen, and the second NA team fails to perform better than The Guard. Worst case scenario Optic fails to make Copenhagen and both NA teams get more points than the Guard. They would then be the second seeded team in LCQ.

posted about 2 years ago

With NRG beating the guard, sentinels is now on the bubble in points for LCQ. Down below shows the NA points standings.
For Sentinels to make it to LCQ, Ghost must either lose first round or Sentinels beat C9 and Ghost lose in round 2.

Assuming LCQ is the same as last year, the top 8 teams in points outside of those qualified for Champions will make it in.
Updated as Stage 2 Points are higher than Stage 1

Place. Team (Minimum Points after Stage 2, Current Points, Max points if out of Playoffs)

  1. Optic Gaming (785, 750, x)
  2. The Guard (220, 200, 220)
    ------Champions Cutoff----
  3. XSET (80, 45, x)
  4. Luminosity (70, 35, x)
  5. Cloud9 (65, 50, 70)
  6. 100 Thieves (50, 15, x)
  7. NRG (50, 15, x)
  8. Evil Geniuses (45, 10, x)
  9. Faze (45, 10, x)
  10. Sentinels (45, 30, 50)
    ----Last Chance Qualifier Cut-off----
  11. Ghost Gaming (35, 35, x)
  12. Version1 (35, 35, 35)
  13. Pittsburg Knights (30, 30, 30)
  14. TSM (15, 0, 20)
posted about 2 years ago

I'd lean Fnatic, but acting like optic wouldn't be in this game, or couldn't even win it, is disingenuous.

posted about 2 years ago

There are a lot of good teams in NA. Pick any of the ones making playoffs, and you probably will have a chance for them to make a run.
EMEA is slightly more top heavy, but Fnatic, FPX, Acend, and Guild are teams to cheer for. M3C is a question mark but until they are eliminated I won't say they can't win it all. TL is fun to watch, but they never show up at the biggest moments.
LATAM is Kru's region, but if you want to go against the grain, both Leviatan and E-Xolos have given kru issues in the past.
Brazil is Loud territory. Mibr and NIP are good sleeper picks, but let's be honest, they play second fiddle to LOUD.
Korea is DRX. Don't even bother looking at another team.
Japan should be controlled by ZETA, but both Crazy Raccoon and Northception are teams you can root for.
APAC is interesting, but I doubt anyone dethrones PRX. Xerxia also is a good team. There are a couple others, but I'm not super well versed on APAC's pecking order.

posted about 2 years ago

Tenz

posted about 2 years ago

Shaz just needs to move away from igl. His individual ability is still pretty strong, but it's obvious being the igl has affected his play a ton.

posted about 2 years ago

C9*

posted about 2 years ago

You're not wrong.

posted about 2 years ago

This Fnatic lineup has only played multiple times on 2 maps. (Icebox 3-0, Ascent 1-1)
The rest is all 1-0s. We won't really know how deep FNC is until playoffs I think. They don't seem uncomfortable on any map though, which is very good.

posted about 2 years ago

Split : FNC
Bind : Optic
Ascent : Slight lean Optic.
Icebox : FNC
Breeze : FNC
Fracture : Optic (Easily their best map in M1)
Haven : slight lean FNC

posted about 2 years ago

Don't even hate EMEA teams. Their fans are insufferable though.

posted about 2 years ago

Yeah, fnatic looking good. Would be shocked in they don't get top 3. Of course they have to show up in playoffs first, so we'll see.

posted about 2 years ago

Emea had a superiority complex to the point if they didn't win, it's obviously not their fault.

posted about 2 years ago

Typical delusional EU fan.

posted about 2 years ago

Sure, but people keep acting like Fnatic was some invincible force that would've beaten everyone.

posted about 2 years ago

Considering G2 won't be there to let the region down, maybe you're right.

posted about 2 years ago

Assuming nothing bad happens, Copenhagen should be the best, I agree.
I'm not sold on fnatic though, they still lost to G2. FPX probably gets top 3 masters though if not first, I agree.
However, there were no pushovers this Masters, which is more what I'm referring to, Optic didn't have a single easy matchup.

posted about 2 years ago

EMEA doing everything they can to discredit Optic. I'm just returning the favor.

posted about 2 years ago

Fnatic still lost to G2. Stop trying to pretend G2 doesn't exist. Also every team except maybe NIP was good enough to win it. On average Optic played better teams than the rest of the previous winners.

posted about 2 years ago

Disagree with NRG. They have a lot of interesting comps and strategies. They just sucked.

posted about 2 years ago

I'm not taking away from them, but acting like optics run isn't impressive is disingenuous.

posted about 2 years ago

M3 was Envy's first LAN, and if EMEA was so much better, Acend wouldn't have choked vs. 100T. (Also 100T beat Gambit too)

In Champs, Envy ran into issues with covid.

In M1, EMEA's representatives failed to make it out of the first round.

posted about 2 years ago

Optic also had the highest level of competition of any masters, while sentinels had the least.

Optic also had to play significantly more games than any team in any masters.
Not saying I disagree with your list, but I don't think any of the previous champions would have won this past masters.

posted about 2 years ago

Yes

posted about 2 years ago

Only way guard isn't first seed is if 2 new teams make it in and do better than 8th

posted about 2 years ago
1 •• 3 4 5 6 7 8 9