The fact that u do not even know the full evidence or what happened but support a girl who claimed shit and never showed up with an actual case, the fact that u support a girl who came out after just before his main event , the fact that she never persued the case afterwards shows the number of brain cells u have. I think u should give the benefit of doubt atleast to someone who put allegations on a person and then never persued it and probably never will . Was her motive to make Sinatraa look bar in front of the whole world or actually legally do something. From the incidents which happened so far i think anyone can tell what's her motives.

This is such a brain dead argument. People do not cooperate in giving some evidences cus their lawyers told them to in so many different cases . It may provide the wrong notion or change the picture in many cases when it's not actually true . Not providing evidence is not a crime in any way .Sinatraa did not provide some piece of evidence cuz his lawyer told him not to. I think it's better to listen to his lawyers then some random vlr user telling otherwise. The women herself did not even provide the required details to start a case and u expect him to give the public everything for no reason .