i'm not talking about pedophilia as in a legal concept, i'm talking about it as in a moral concept, which are independent of laws which i keep talking about.
Riot has NOTHING to do with NOTHING in the "moral concept". I doubt you can show ONE punishment Riot did because of a SUBJECTIVE "moral concept" (although I agree with it, It's subjective). If Riot did this, would be imputing a crime to pancc, and pancc would have a good guaranteed lawsuit against riot.
Riot's rulebook prohibits swearing etc out of game, why can't it have a stance on pedophilia of players? arguably a much more signifant issue.
Riot doesn't prohibit swearing, it prohibits HATE SPEECH, which you know is a crime.
are you stupid? i literally said it's nothing to do with a crime - it's Riot's decision to blacklist someone. they can blacklist someone regardless of what they have done.
If Riot ban someone with no valid justification, they would face consequences (like a lawsuit), and it would open a lot of precedents, As I already said.
he was within the law but as i literally just said in my last reply that doesn't mean he wasn't in the wrong.
If he wasn't really wrong, Riot can't do nothing.
: MORALLY Riot should do something (blacklist) irrelevant of any LEGAL (for law!) conditions because PEOPLE (not governments) agree that pedophilia is morally wrong.
Riot can't do nothing based in a subjective moral, as I already explained more than 1 time above.