S tier= OPTIC (They are at least top 4 team in my eyes)
A tier= FNC(even with subs) TL (EMEA stronk)
B tier= DRX(still can farm asia) NiP (stomped LEV)
C tier= Xerxia(no patiphan no party) KRU(struggled vs LEV) ZETA(gl)
S tier= OPTIC (They are at least top 4 team in my eyes)
A tier= FNC(even with subs) TL (EMEA stronk)
B tier= DRX(still can farm asia) NiP (stomped LEV)
C tier= Xerxia(no patiphan no party) KRU(struggled vs LEV) ZETA(gl)
S: Optic, Fnatic (h1ber is god you will see)
A: KRU, DRX, TL
B: Xerxia, NIP, Zeta
all in order
You guys are overrating Liquid, the competition increased too much, Xerxia could qualify
Fnatic is unlikely to beat NIP with 2 subs even if H1ber is good
Why are people automatically assuming ZETA is gonna do bad at Masters?
Just because they are a Japanese team doesn't mean they are going to bad. CR may have left a bad impression, but we can't just say that ZETA = CR.
Because newsflash: ZETA =/= CR.
so are they better than TGRD?
JP as a region hasn't shown anything so they need to prove themselves instead of asking people to rate them high
Obviously TGRD is miles better than ZETA, everyone knows that.
But that's not to say ZETA is going to flounder out of Masters. Every region has potential to be great.
yea so they need to prove first
why would I rate them high for now?