Thats the main reason they lost, has to be, it's not like NA players lack skill, because they have some of the best raw aim. IMO they don't hack coaches who give them original ideas, Take SEN for example, after they dominated at Iceland, many NA teams stole their agent comps and strats, that's an indicator that the NA teams either didn't have a "good" coach who was making strats for them or they were just lazy.
Regards
Aperture
Son of Oil, Father of QueueK and Causer of Arguments
What are you on about thats not what a coach does, a coach helps fix tactical errors, creates tactics. An igl is the one who needs to know the proper timings for things, to read the situation and come up with the response, to improve how well the team play together and to determine what things work for the team and what things dont.
So i say the coach helps with teamplay and then you type a paragraph about how the coach helps fix teamplay errors and create cohesion between the team and say im wrong?
You do realize that there can be overlap in what the coach and IGL do right? They can both strive towards fixing the same problems at times. They can both work on tactics they can both adjust things so that there is less mistakes.
Youre braindead man. The IGL and Coach are both working towards the same goal. Having the team play better as a unit and working on better strategies. They both watch demos/vods both of their own team and future opponents and come together to create a winning plan. You just come off as a butthurt argumentative devils advocate loser. Grow up
How do you even judge a coach? I feel like most of their impact is behind closed doors. Even with starts, we don't know who came up with a specific strategy, whether is was the igl or a player. Even with antistrating we don't know their impact. Then when it gets to midrounding, its even harder to see a coaches impact because things become more adaptive.
Discord