-10

Canadaman getting served

posted in Off Topic
Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
ParisVLR

Hello, Candaman

The Paris law firm would like to serve you on the grounds of false accusation/slandering my client. (HenBabyH)

Please see the file/proof I have attached.

Your Canadian privileges were revoked on Sep 24, 2024 at 12:58 PM EDT by Cloudberry (https://www.vlr.gg/post/4148465/canadians-come).
https://www.vlr.gg/407911/henbabyh-come

Please act accordingly by sending in your official statement and any witness testimony’s you would like to use to get this resolved.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
The Paris Law Firm

#2
HenBabyH
-9
Frags
+

COOK THAT FRAUD

#3
CanadaMan
9
Frags
+

Hello "The Paris Law Firm" where is this proof? You have linked a post that is factual in its entirety. No false claims were made against your client. All that was spoken was the truth.

The Canadian Council will respond accordingly.

Regards,
Canadaman

#5
ParisVLR
-3
Frags
+

Hello Canadaman, I have spoken with my client and we are asking for the official document with the signings from cloudberry before we proceed.

Thanks,
Paris

#8
JingggsFamilyLawyer
7
Frags
+

Don't worry Canadaman. I got you.
Ever since I left that choker J0nggg my stats have been upgraded by +50

#9
CanadaMan
0
Frags
+

Thank you JingggsFamilyLawyer, I appreciate this response.

Regards,
CanadaMan

#10
HenBabyH
-3
Frags
+

i’m starting to doubt YOUR candianess

regards,
HenBabyH

#11
CanadaMan
5
Frags
+

candianess

Before you doubt my Canadian citizenship, you should learn to spell.

Regards,
CanadaMan

#4
Kyronnn
6
Frags
+

the roleplay goes crazy

#6
Galactc
1
Frags
+

The off-season has made us all go crazy at this point its clear

#7
idkmanwth
0
Frags
+

i swear i saw a thread like this 3 days ago

#12
JingggsFamilyLawyer
9
Frags
+

Hello ParisVLR
I am JFL and I will defend my good friend and client Canadaman today.

My client, Canada "Canadaman" Man, asserts that HenBabyH’s dislike of poutine—a widely recognized and beloved Canadian dish—justifies the revocation of HenBabyH’s right to use the Canadian flag. This decision stems from the symbolic connection between national identity and the respect for its cultural symbols. While HenBabyH’s dislike of poutine is a personal matter, it raises concerns about their alignment with core elements of Canadian identity and values. My mentioned legal proof will argue in favor of Canadaman’s decision under both Canadian constitutional law and symbolic jurisprudence.

The Canadian flag represents the values, culture, and unity of Canada. According to Canadian law, national symbols such as the flag must be respected and used in ways that reflect these values. The National Flag of Canada Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. N-2) outlines the importance of the flag as a national symbol, and while the Act does not strictly regulate individual use, any disrespect toward core elements of Canadian identity, which include cherished cultural staples like poutine, could be considered inconsistent with proper flag usage.

Poutine is more than just a dish; it has evolved into a cultural symbol that reflects the inclusivity, innovation, and community spirit of Canada. It is recognized internationally as distinctly Canadian, much like maple syrup or hockey. To reject poutine is, in essence, to distance oneself from a core aspect of Canadian culinary identity. While personal preferences are protected under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter), they do not provide blanket immunity when cultural heritage is at stake.

Legal precedent suggests that national symbols like the flag should be used by individuals who uphold the values and ideals represented by those symbols. The Supreme Court of Canada has emphasized that “national symbols serve to unify citizens under shared cultural and moral values” (R. v. Keegstra [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697). HenBabyH’s open rejection of poutine could be interpreted as a rejection of a key cultural tradition, and therefore as disrespecting one of the values symbolized by the Canadian flag.

Section 1 of the Charter allows for reasonable limits to individual freedoms, including the use of national symbols, as long as those limits can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. Canadaman’s decision to revoke HenBabyH’s right to use the Canadian flag is a reasonable action based on the broader cultural context. HenBabyH’s stance on poutine suggests a detachment from Canadian cultural unity, which may reasonably be interpreted as grounds for limiting their use of the flag to prevent misuse or misrepresentation of Canadian values.

Conclusion

Canadaman’s decision to revoke HenBabyH’s right to use the Canadian flag is legally justified based on the symbolic importance of poutine as a national icon and HenBabyH’s rejection of it as being in conflict with the values symbolized by the flag. This restriction is a reasonable and proportionate response that upholds the respect for Canadian cultural symbols while remaining consistent with legal precedent on symbolic nationalism.

Therefore, Canadaman is right in his decision to banish HenBabyH from using the Canadian flag.

We wish to gain 3million goon coins for the emotional distress and harassment Mr HenBabyH has caused my client. Thank you.

#13
CanadaMan
7
Frags
+

Thank you sir, you are always welcome in Canada with full privileges.

Regards,
CanadaMan

#14
JingggsFamilyLawyer
5
Frags
+

Just doing my job ☝🏼

#15
ParisVLR
-1
Frags
+

Subject: Settlement Discussion

Dear [Jing’s Family Lawyer],

I hope this message finds you well.

I wish to address your serious claim regarding my client's "dislike of poutine." I understand the basis of your position, but I believe there may be an opportunity for us to resolve this matter amicably.

My client is a respected member of the Canadian community, and I would like to explore a settlement agreement that could be beneficial for both parties. Would your client be open to discussing this further?

I look forward to your response.

Best regards,

Paris

#16
JingggsFamilyLawyer
2
Frags
+

I will discuss with my client regarding the settlements. As his representative, I shall only convey what he wants to speak.
@canadaman

#17
CanadaMan
-1
Frags
+

I believe we can, maybe we could forego the monetary compensation and just leave it as their clients Canadian Privileges are revoked fully and permanently, they may continue using the Canadian flag on vlr but they are not welcome to any of The Canadian Council nor any of its privileges' as stated before.

#18
JingggsFamilyLawyer
0
Frags
+

I suppose this is a fair compensation

#20
ParisVLR
0
Frags
+

Subject: Request for Discussion on Settlement Agreement

Thank you for moving forward with the settlement agreement.

My client and I feel that the current punishment is quite severe. We would like to propose a reconsideration: could my client have his Canadian flag/status restored in full after two weeks of wearing the international flag? We hope this can be open for discussion and possible revisions.

Additionally, we kindly request that you withdraw the recent legal notice for $15 million.

Thank you for your attention to these matters.

Best regards,
Paris

#21
JingggsFamilyLawyer
0
Frags
+

Hello Mr ParisVLR
We have already taken down the monetary compensation claims. For more, you have to talk directly to my client, Canadaman. As you can understand, he has been deeply hurt by everything your client has done.

#22
ParisVLR
0
Frags
+

Please@ your client sir and get him to respond back to our counter.

Thanks,
Paris

#23
JingggsFamilyLawyer
0
Frags
+

@canadaman
What shall we do, sir

#24
CanadaMan
0
Frags
+

please see the response from my representative here: https://www.vlr.gg/post/4152068/canadaman-getting-served

#25
ParisVLR
0
Frags
+

Sir your past version of this settlement has nothing to do with the current settlement deal on the table. Please refer to the one I posted above.

#19
JingggsFamilyLawyer
3
Frags
+

FINAL SETTLEMENT NOTICE

Date: 26/09/2024

To: HenBabyH and ParisVLR

Subject: Final Verdict on Canadian Privileges

Dear HenBabyH and ParisVLR,

After further consideration, Canadaman has decided to forego the monetary compensation of 3 million goon coins initially demanded. However, the following final decision is issued:

Verdict:
HenBabyH will have their Canadian privileges fully and permanently revoked. While you may continue using the Canadian flag on VLR, you are no longer welcome to any participation in The Canadian Council or to access any of its associated privileges, as previously stated.

This decision is final and non-negotiable.

Sincerely,
JFL
On behalf of Canadaman

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment