Built By Gamers vs. NRG Esports | Champions Tour North America Stage 2: Challengers 2 | Main Event | Valorant match

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Poach BBG	1.08 0.72 1.36	243 217 263	16 5 11	/ 15 9 6 /	4 1 3	+1 -4 +5	57% 56% 58%	158 150 164	26% 17% 33%	2 0 2	3 2 1	-1 -2 +1
Critical BBG	1.05 0.86 1.20	200 160 230	16 5 11	/ 15 8 7 /	3 1 2	+1 -3 +4	71% 67% 75%	141 110 165	18% 10% 23%	1 0 1	1 0 1	0 0 0
rarkar BBG	0.86 0.38 1.22	152 99 193	12 3 9	/ 13 8 5 /	5 2 3	-1 -5 +4	76% 67% 83%	105 52 144	18% 11% 21%	1 1 0	3 2 1	-2 -1 -1
Will BBG	0.68 0.31 0.96	186 127 232	11 3 8	/ 16 8 8 /	3 0 3	-5 -5 0	62% 44% 75%	120 91 141	12% 17% 9%	2 0 2	2 1 1	0 -1 +1
bjor BBG	0.48 0.04 0.83	148 55 218	9 1 8	/ 17 8 9 /	3 0 3	-8 -7 -1	48% 33% 58%	106 42 154	19% 17% 20%	1 0 1	5 3 2	-4 -3 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Poach

BBG

1.08 0.72 1.36

243 217 263

16 5 11

/ 15 9 6 /

4 1 3

+1 -4 +5

57% 56% 58%

158 150 164

26% 17% 33%

2 0 2

3 2 1

-1 -2 +1

Critical

BBG

1.05 0.86 1.20

200 160 230

16 5 11

/ 15 8 7 /

3 1 2

+1 -3 +4

71% 67% 75%

141 110 165

18% 10% 23%

1 0 1

0 0 0

rarkar

BBG

0.86 0.38 1.22

152 99 193

12 3 9

/ 13 8 5 /

5 2 3

-1 -5 +4

76% 67% 83%

105 52 144

18% 11% 21%

1 1 0

3 2 1

-2 -1 -1

Will

BBG

0.68 0.31 0.96

186 127 232

11 3 8

/ 16 8 8 /

3 0 3

-5 -5 0

62% 44% 75%

120 91 141

12% 17% 9%

2 0 2

2 1 1

0 -1 +1

bjor

BBG

0.48 0.04 0.83

148 55 218

9 1 8

/ 17 8 9 /

3 0 3

-8 -7 -1

48% 33% 58%

106 42 154

19% 17% 20%

1 0 1

5 3 2

-4 -3 -1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
daps NRG	1.48 1.03 2.08	210 146 296	17 6 11	/ 9 7 2 /	2 2 0	+8 -1 +9	76% 58% 100%	136 96 190	33% 17% 48%	2 1 1	0 0 0	+2 +1 +1
ANDROID NRG	1.40 1.17 1.72	246 221 279	18 9 9	/ 11 8 3 /	7 2 5	+7 +1 +6	81% 67% 100%	159 136 188	28% 33% 25%	4 2 2	1 1 0	+3 +1 +2
tex NRG	1.16 1.40 0.85	220 306 108	15 12 3	/ 14 10 4 /	7 3 4	+1 +2 -1	67% 58% 78%	133 184 65	27% 37% 7%	4 2 2	2 1 1	+2 +1 +1
s0m NRG	0.90 0.59 1.32	212 156 287	15 6 9	/ 15 12 3 /	5 3 2	0 -6 +6	81% 67% 100%	137 109 174	30% 28% 32%	3 1 2	2 2 0	+1 -1 +2
eeiu NRG	0.81 0.29 1.50	144 61 256	11 2 9	/ 15 11 4 /	10 3 7	-4 -9 +5	71% 50% 100%	92 58 136	21% 8% 29%	1 0 1	2 2 0	-1 -2 +1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

daps

NRG

1.48 1.03 2.08

210 146 296

17 6 11

/ 9 7 2 /

2 2 0

+8 -1 +9

76% 58% 100%

136 96 190

33% 17% 48%

2 1 1

0 0 0

+2 +1 +1

ANDROID

NRG

1.40 1.17 1.72

246 221 279

18 9 9

/ 11 8 3 /

7 2 5

+7 +1 +6

81% 67% 100%

159 136 188

28% 33% 25%

4 2 2

1 1 0

+3 +1 +2

tex

NRG

1.16 1.40 0.85

220 306 108

15 12 3

/ 14 10 4 /

7 3 4

+1 +2 -1

67% 58% 78%

133 184 65

27% 37% 7%

4 2 2

2 1 1

+2 +1 +1

s0m

NRG

0.90 0.59 1.32

212 156 287

15 6 9

/ 15 12 3 /

5 3 2

0 -6 +6

81% 67% 100%

137 109 174

30% 28% 32%

3 1 2

2 2 0

+1 -1 +2

eeiu

NRG

0.81 0.29 1.50

144 61 256

11 2 9

/ 15 11 4 /

10 3 7

-4 -9 +5

71% 50% 100%

92 58 136

21% 8% 29%

1 0 1

2 2 0

-1 -2 +1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Critical BBG	0.87 1.03 0.96	203 156 235	27 8 19	/ 30 12 18 /	9 3 6	-3 -4 +1	68% 69% 67%	142 101 169	18% 17% 19%	1 0 1	2 0 2	-1 0 -1
Poach BBG	0.46 1.27 0.94	198 137 242	26 6 20	/ 30 15 15 /	7 2 5	-4 -9 +5	50% 38% 58%	130 91 155	24% 14% 30%	3 0 3	7 3 4	-4 -3 -1
Will BBG	0.78 0.72 0.74	167 173 166	21 9 12	/ 30 12 18 /	8 2 6	-9 -3 -6	58% 50% 63%	113 118 110	15% 15% 15%	4 1 3	6 3 3	-2 -2 0
bjor BBG	0.71 0.64 0.67	174 184 166	23 10 13	/ 32 14 18 /	5 1 4	-9 -4 -5	55% 50% 58%	106 87 118	26% 28% 25%	1 0 1	7 4 3	-6 -4 -2
rarkar BBG	0.36 0.84 0.65	132 102 155	19 6 13	/ 29 13 16 /	8 2 6	-10 -7 -3	65% 63% 67%	90 58 111	22% 13% 26%	3 1 2	6 4 2	-3 -3 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Critical

BBG

0.87 1.03 0.96

203 156 235

27 8 19

/ 30 12 18 /

9 3 6

-3 -4 +1

68% 69% 67%

142 101 169

18% 17% 19%

1 0 1

2 0 2

-1 0 -1

Poach

BBG

0.46 1.27 0.94

198 137 242

26 6 20

/ 30 15 15 /

7 2 5

-4 -9 +5

50% 38% 58%

130 91 155

24% 14% 30%

3 0 3

7 3 4

-4 -3 -1

Will

BBG

0.78 0.72 0.74

167 173 166

21 9 12

/ 30 12 18 /

8 2 6

-9 -3 -6

58% 50% 63%

113 118 110

15% 15% 15%

4 1 3

6 3 3

-2 -2 0

bjor

BBG

0.71 0.64 0.67

174 184 166

23 10 13

/ 32 14 18 /

5 1 4

-9 -4 -5

55% 50% 58%

106 87 118

26% 28% 25%

1 0 1

7 4 3

-6 -4 -2

rarkar

BBG

0.36 0.84 0.65

132 102 155

19 6 13

/ 29 13 16 /

8 2 6

-10 -7 -3

65% 63% 67%

90 58 111

22% 13% 26%

3 1 2

6 4 2

-3 -3 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
daps NRG	1.22 1.65 1.39	211 179 260	33 17 16	/ 17 11 6 /	7 3 4	+16 +6 +10	80% 75% 88%	122 111 139	29% 26% 33%	3 2 1	0 0 0	+3 +2 +1
tex NRG	1.33 1.17 1.27	264 292 219	35 24 11	/ 26 17 9 /	10 5 5	+9 +7 +2	75% 71% 81%	154 172 128	29% 29% 28%	12 5 7	5 3 2	+7 +2 +5
eeiu NRG	0.90 1.54 1.16	192 128 283	27 10 17	/ 22 15 7 /	18 9 9	+5 -5 +10	78% 71% 88%	126 102 162	30% 30% 29%	2 0 2	2 2 0	0 -2 +2
ANDROID NRG	1.14 1.08 1.12	193 213 169	27 18 9	/ 23 15 8 /	9 4 5	+4 +3 +1	70% 71% 69%	132 142 118	28% 33% 21%	5 3 2	2 2 0	+3 +1 +2
s0m NRG	0.91 1.02 0.95	216 210 226	29 17 12	/ 28 20 8 /	10 6 4	+1 -3 +4	78% 75% 81%	141 146 133	30% 31% 30%	6 4 2	3 3 0	+3 +1 +2

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

daps

NRG

1.22 1.65 1.39

211 179 260

33 17 16

/ 17 11 6 /

7 3 4

+16 +6 +10

80% 75% 88%

122 111 139

29% 26% 33%

3 2 1

0 0 0

+3 +2 +1

tex

NRG

1.33 1.17 1.27

264 292 219

35 24 11

/ 26 17 9 /

10 5 5

+9 +7 +2

75% 71% 81%

154 172 128

29% 29% 28%

12 5 7

5 3 2

+7 +2 +5

eeiu

NRG

0.90 1.54 1.16

192 128 283

27 10 17

/ 22 15 7 /

18 9 9

+5 -5 +10

78% 71% 88%

126 102 162

30% 30% 29%

2 0 2

2 2 0

0 -2 +2

ANDROID

NRG

1.14 1.08 1.12

193 213 169

27 18 9

/ 23 15 8 /

9 4 5

+4 +3 +1

70% 71% 69%

132 142 118

28% 33% 21%

5 3 2

2 2 0

+3 +1 +2

s0m

NRG

0.91 1.02 0.95

216 210 226

29 17 12

/ 28 20 8 /

10 6 4

+1 -3 +4

78% 75% 81%

141 146 133

30% 31% 30%

6 4 2

3 3 0

+3 +1 +2

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
bjor BBG	0.87 1.58 0.46	200 349 114	14 9 5	/ 15 6 9 /	2 1 1	-1 +3 -4	63% 71% 58%	106 146 83	37% 35% 40%	0 0 0	2 1 1	-2 -1 -1
Critical BBG	0.87 0.88 0.86	206 151 239	11 3 8	/ 15 4 11 /	6 2 4	-4 -1 -3	63% 71% 58%	142 91 172	19% 38% 15%	0 0 0	1 0 1	-1 0 -1
Will BBG	0.82 1.38 0.49	147 231 99	10 6 4	/ 14 4 10 /	5 2 3	-4 +2 -6	53% 57% 50%	106 153 79	18% 13% 24%	2 1 1	4 2 2	-2 -1 -1
Poach BBG	0.79 0.12 1.18	152 34 222	10 1 9	/ 15 6 9 /	3 1 2	-5 -5 0	42% 14% 58%	98 16 146	21% 0% 26%	1 0 1	4 1 3	-3 -1 -2
rarkar BBG	0.41 0.34 0.45	112 105 117	7 3 4	/ 16 5 11 /	3 0 3	-9 -2 -7	53% 57% 50%	73 64 78	29% 17% 33%	2 0 2	3 2 1	-1 -2 +1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

bjor

BBG

0.87 1.58 0.46

200 349 114

14 9 5

/ 15 6 9 /

2 1 1

-1 +3 -4

63% 71% 58%

106 146 83

37% 35% 40%

0 0 0

2 1 1

-2 -1 -1

Critical

BBG

0.87 0.88 0.86

206 151 239

11 3 8

/ 15 4 11 /

6 2 4

-4 -1 -3

63% 71% 58%

142 91 172

19% 38% 15%

0 0 0

1 0 1

-1 0 -1

Will

BBG

0.82 1.38 0.49

147 231 99

10 6 4

/ 14 4 10 /

5 2 3

-4 +2 -6

53% 57% 50%

106 153 79

18% 13% 24%

2 1 1

4 2 2

-2 -1 -1

Poach

BBG

0.79 0.12 1.18

152 34 222

10 1 9

/ 15 6 9 /

3 1 2

-5 -5 0

42% 14% 58%

98 16 146

21% 0% 26%

1 0 1

4 1 3

-3 -1 -2

rarkar

BBG

0.41 0.34 0.45

112 105 117

7 3 4

/ 16 5 11 /

3 0 3

-9 -2 -7

53% 57% 50%

73 64 78

29% 17% 33%

2 0 2

3 2 1

-1 -2 +1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
eeiu NRG	1.54 1.51 1.60	239 195 317	16 8 8	/ 7 4 3 /	8 6 2	+9 +4 +5	84% 92% 71%	165 147 196	36% 40% 29%	1 0 1	0 0 0	+1 0 +1
tex NRG	1.38 1.26 1.59	308 278 361	20 12 8	/ 12 7 5 /	3 2 1	+8 +5 +3	84% 83% 86%	177 159 208	30% 23% 44%	8 3 5	3 2 1	+5 +1 +4
daps NRG	1.28 1.40 1.09	212 212 212	16 11 5	/ 8 4 4 /	5 1 4	+8 +7 +1	84% 92% 71%	106 126 73	25% 33% 8%	1 1 0	0 0 0	+1 +1 0
s0m NRG	1.01 1.23 0.65	220 264 146	14 11 3	/ 13 8 5 /	5 3 2	+1 +3 -2	74% 83% 57%	146 184 81	30% 32% 22%	3 3 0	1 1 0	+2 +2 0
ANDROID NRG	0.80 1.11 0.27	139 205 27	9 9 0	/ 12 7 5 /	2 2 0	-3 +2 -5	58% 75% 29%	103 148 27	27% 32% 0%	1 1 0	1 1 0	0 0 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

eeiu

NRG

1.54 1.51 1.60

239 195 317

16 8 8

/ 7 4 3 /

8 6 2

+9 +4 +5

84% 92% 71%

165 147 196

36% 40% 29%

1 0 1

0 0 0

+1 0 +1

tex

NRG

1.38 1.26 1.59

308 278 361

20 12 8

/ 12 7 5 /

3 2 1

+8 +5 +3

84% 83% 86%

177 159 208

30% 23% 44%

8 3 5

3 2 1

+5 +1 +4

daps

NRG

1.28 1.40 1.09

212 212 212

16 11 5

/ 8 4 4 /

5 1 4

+8 +7 +1

84% 92% 71%

106 126 73

25% 33% 8%

1 1 0

0 0 0

+1 +1 0

s0m

NRG

1.01 1.23 0.65

220 264 146

14 11 3

/ 13 8 5 /

5 3 2

+1 +3 -2

74% 83% 57%

146 184 81

30% 32% 22%

3 3 0

1 1 0

+2 +2 0

ANDROID

NRG

0.80 1.11 0.27

139 205 27

9 9 0

/ 12 7 5 /

2 2 0

-3 +2 -5

58% 75% 29%

103 148 27

27% 32% 0%

1 1 0

0 0 0

STRAWHAT

Frags

–

NRG 2-1

Kenzhi

Frags

–

NRG popping off lately they might go on a 2-1 but if things go bad BBG might do a reverse card

supernova

Frags

–

NRG 2-0

plas

Frags

–

lets be honest guys, NRG 2-0 maybe 2-1 if BBG are feeling themselves

100flukes

Frags

–

Nrg 2-0 aceu poops on these kids

Dylxn

Frags

–

NRG 2-0 they are built diff

bloodysky

Frags

–

I feel like BBG will (and can) prepare vs. NRG like how they prepared vs. Sentinels and they will just "counter-strat" NRG. But then again, I feel like NRG beats BBG in aim duels so this should be a good matchup.

#11

BIGGEST_LG_FAN

Frags

–

only reason bbg beat sen is cuz poach could prep for sen while shaz had nooooo idea what bbg was gonna do, the reason why this team will lose is because they themselves will get prepped for, they cant win as long as daps and co have demos from the bbg games

#12

WitLitning

Frags

–

you’re definitely right about preparing for strats. however, i don’t think that’s the only reason they lost. poach doesn’t win a 1v4 by only knowing strats, if you know what i mean. i think sentinels was just outclassed that day. every team has off days, so i’m not here to flame sentinels. but i do think shahzam, while he has a valid point, was making too many excuses for his teams loss.

#13

BIGGEST_LG_FAN

Frags

–

true, he was quite obviously trying to save face after saying that he shouldnt even have to play the open quali and proceeded to lose xd

#25

Dylxn

Frags

–

IMO in was a little bit of both, counter strating from BBG, and a bad day from SEN. I’m not trying to discredit BBGs win and say it was a fluke, they did a great job but I think SEN had and off day as well

#15

bloodysky

Frags

–

That's true. Would love to see how they play against one another given the fact that they have a lot of tapes to review and use to prepare versus one another.

Delusional_Mitch_Fan

-1

Frags

–

LETS GO NRG Brad!

rohooster

-1

Frags

–

BBG wins this like they'll win the entire tournament(and also Masters Reykjavik)

#10

WitLitning

Frags

–

I will prob pull for BBG because they’ve been underdogs and their name reminds me of BBC, so they’re good meme value. Also this Bjor guy has some good Killjoy setup videos on YT.

But I also like android from his andbox days, plus som is friendly w a bunch of tsm players. eeiu is one of my favorite Sova’s.

honestly just want close games and overtime

#16

plas

Frags

–

bro? BBC?

#18

FireII

Frags

–

😏😏😏

#19

WitLitning

Frags

–

😉😉😉

#14

GetsystheGr8

Frags

–

NRG 2-0

#17

beb0p

Frags

–

BBG fLuKeRz, 2-0 for NRG

#20

Scarlet

Frags

–

Money for NRG

#21

number_1_bjor_fan

-6

Frags

–

BBG 2-0

#22

SelectiveFucksGiven

-3

Frags

–

NRG is already getting paid so who cares. I want BBG to 2-0 and get a legit org to sign them.

#23

Insyte

Frags

–

BBG is a real org wdym?

#24

beb0p

Frags

–

and they aren’t even a bad org, they are decently recognizable

#26

sentence

Frags

–

WE LIKE FORTNITE WE LIKE FORTNITE

#27

teemu

-4

Frags

–

upvote system is so fucking cringe for a hltv like site. Oh an opinion i dont agree with? downvote

#28

beb0p

-4

Frags

–

should we have like a no downfrags only upfrags maybe? 🤔

#29

100flukes

-3

Frags

–

I mean its annoying but yea, just learn to ignore upvotes/downvotes, most ppl are sheeps

#30

ASD

Frags

–

bruh

#31

plas

Frags

–

i mean this was expected