Everyone thinks (insert team) is good because they beat this team or that team. That's not how valorant works. it's not rock paper scissors; it's an FPS game, in the wise words of our ancestors. Teams change their picks and bans according to match-ups, it will not be the same just because "they beat (insert team) on this map". More data goes into it than just wins and losses, yet every time someone posts their map pick/bans someone chimes in with "why would they do that? they beat KC on that map". that's not how the process works.
secondly, on GenG: i said they're on fraudwatch bc at this point they have no quality wins in my eyes. based on the stats of their previous opponents, i don't believe that they have had a true test yet. I also believe that TH and KC just imploded rather than PRX being the team that improved overnight. i could be wrong (i am wrong often bc valorant is complex) but i believe that whole heartedly. we'll see in a few short hours :D
also bring back banter. you say one fella is smoking crack and now you're the worst person on earth lol