had fnc in groups
no trexx
have to play back to back bo3s
back in 2023 could not qualify for tokyo after losing to fut
did not play in lcq
unlucky team
so because riens has visa issues AND they signed a 17 year old and have to use their sub for that, they get a get out of jail free card? that seems dumb to me. your org signed a player you know isn't eligible for franchising yet and so you're forced to use your sub. then if anything else happens to another player riot allows you to just let them play from home? what happens if a player can't play at all?
signing a 17 year old is IN Vitality's control, Trexx's VISA issues are most likely not. they need fair and equal ruling.
for riens, heretics submitted the paperwork on time and the visa situation is out of heretics' hands. They can't be punished for germany's visa laws + they had ONE sub who is patitek who already has to play for w00t, they got no one else.
Vitality got trexx EXTREMELY late, like very very late. Hence his visa was submitted very late and it is vitality's fault that he didnt have visa on time, PLUS they have a sub available unlike heretics.
Hence, why riens is allowed to play remotely and trexx is not.
Use your brains guys
lets say it was vitality's CHOICE to get trexx late and submit a VISA pretty late. it's another CHOICE that Heretics made to sign a 17 year old and be forced to use a sub for the season, and so now that riens is having VISA issues (not a CHOICE) they get an out of jail free card? it seems stupid. both orgs made choices forcing their players to be in weird spots, but one gets to have a player play from home and another doesn't. seems stupid to me. they both have repercussions from their choices in roster moves but only one team gets to have their player play from home. to clarify, I'm not saying riens SHOULDN'T be able to play. I'm saying BOTH should be able to.