literally everyone ragging on Sentinels but can we just say MxS looks insanely good and played extremely well? It doesn't always have to be about who did bad but rather who did good. Brawk played amazing!
One of the fans
After 1 map:
https://www.vlr.gg/281999/mxs-are-u-even-trying
After 1-2:
It's just showmatch
brawk gets a significant amount of value in clutches and generally low number situations but i think he sometimes struggled to get the same value that a lot of at least the old mxm roster would provide
his own personal map pool feels kind of awkward too, his lotus is not all that great despite it being a comfort map for the team(given how much they pick it) and flyuh especially imo, similar story with haven(i think his haven is a bit better than his lotus, but it's not remarkable) and the team overall seem to be quite strong on it, his ascent is good and definitely plays to his strengths, and the other maps are hard to speak to - the whole team sucked at split, bind was almost never played, and the other maps arent in the pool anymore(fwiw his pearl was solid, and his fracture was weak, but the whole team's fracture was not good)
anyway to sum up the essay his map pool feels inconsistent with the team's as a whole(though that may change somewhat with a new team) and his main value in general comes from being extremely strong in clutch situations which is not great for a t2 coordinated team's support player imo
but new team new map pool and i havent watched them play in a little while so my allegations were outdated ultimately