a team losing after placing doesnt say fluke

#1

amyayayy

title, im so tired of people calling other teams like zeta for example fluke runs, im 100 percent sure that if masters had 2 jp slots zeta would perform, jp as a region grew, zeta wasnt a fluke, neither were kru (fuck keznit) or gambit or fpx or like any other team

#2

thatpower

6

Frags

+

–

zeta would have gotten grouped with a full fnatic

#3

Elso

-6

Frags

+

–

no tbh

#4

asdfgh

0

Frags

+

–

here come the zetapologists

#10

thatpower

2

Frags

+

–

zeta fans are scary

#5

amyayayy

1

Frags

+

–

they placed third, i think youre taking a lot of credit away from them, also the icebox game was a lot more of zeta playing well mannered as a team than fnatic playing bad

#7

asdfgh

0

Frags

+

–

idc until copenhagen there we will see

#8

amyayayy

0

Frags

+

–

this fnatic is defeating everyone i have no doubt about that but im pretty sure old fnatic wouldnt even have to face zeta, they wouldnt lose to NIP in the first place

#9

asdfgh

-1

Frags

+

–

i mean idc about japan until copenhagen there we can see if it was just a fluke and they are still bad or if they finally start playing better

#6

Hecking_Love_Tenz

0

Frags

+

–

well people still calling Optic fluke when they have been dominating NA and the only two times finalists internationally. Why wouldn't people call ZETA a fluke team?