1

Zeta are good, stop blaming it on Fnatic

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
Nisham

FPX won EMEA with 2 stand ins and their IGL role changed to Jett.
It's not about Fnatic being bad, it's about Zeta being good
Zeta just w key into the backsite. FNC just got giga outplayed

#2
rdmz1
1
Frags
+

this game isn't nowhere near enough to prove that they're good. if they win a couple more sure.

#3
Vortexy
3
Frags
+

great job by zeta... but I'm sure 2 last second subs still helps at least a tiny bit? also wdym by Fnatic won EMEA with 2 stand ins?

#5
Nisham
0
Frags
+

It defiantly does but I still think its more abt Zeta being good and not Fnc being shit

#9
Vortexy
0
Frags
+

I've liked Zeta and rooted for them to win, but I'm gonna be 100% honest I don't think they would have won was it not for Fnatic's current situations. Yes they played well, but being realistic, I think it's more about Fnatic playing poorly and uncoordinated with 2 last minute subs than Zeta suddenly getting their acts together and clapping Fnatic.

#4
Daniveus
3
Frags
+

fnatic was just terrible there's no denying it

#6
TuNyyy
1
Frags
+

although they did so many mistakes, they played decent, also dont compare fpx with fnatic lol...fpx are on another tier

#7
sebert112
1
Frags
+

there's an element of both -- FNC did look like they had less firepower, but hands down zeta played outta their fucking minds.

i outlined this in a couple of my other posts, but the adaptations to know that FNC plays more off-site and for retake setups, and letting laz get so much space really helped them out.

GG Zeta, well done.

#8
Nisham
1
Frags
+

ANYWAY
LETSFUCKINGGO ASIA

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment