3

would allocation be perfect

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
turkey

masters: the 1 slot from BR/LATAM moved to EMEA

champs: the 1 slot from BR/LATAM LCQ moves to EMEA (non-lcq)

i feel like this would be a perfect slot allocation would anything else be better?

#2
Syelf
-5
Frags
+

3 slots from APAC moves to EMEA

#3
ItsMeDio
2
Frags
+

Master is perfect, no need a rework

champs is the problem

champs: the 1 slot from BR/LATAM LCQ moves to EMEA (non-lcq) - good

also, Asian LCQ should have just 1 slot , give that 1 slot to Master 2 winner (i'm from APAC region btw)

#4
turkey
0
Frags
+
ItsMeDio [#3]

Master is perfect, no need a rework

champs is the problem

champs: the 1 slot from BR/LATAM LCQ moves to EMEA (non-lcq) - good

also, Asian LCQ should have just 1 slot , give that 1 slot to Master 2 winner (i'm from APAC region btw)

truth i forgot about the masters winners

#5
bambamskrrt
1
Frags
+

no, slot reduction is never good and healthy for any region, but the merge of some of the minor region ( single country region) like br to latam and merger kr and japan seems reasonable if they still wanna keep the 12 and 16 team format for master and champion. and please RITO just made 24 team format for champion if you could not bare to merge the region.

#6
Viktor22
0
Frags
+

About champs i 100% agree with you. However, this 1 slot for LATAM/BR for masters is fair for me. At the last champs, KRU reached the semifinals having the toughest path for any team. At the same time, SA LCQ showed that, on avarage, BR is better than LATAM. So taking the one garanteed slot of BR and making it a fight between BR and LATAM seems to me a good solution given what happened last year.

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment