Los Grandes vs. Ninjas In Pyjamas | Champions Tour Brazil Stage 1: Challengers 1 | Closed Qualifier #1 | Valorant match

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
prince LOS	1.16 1.23 1.06	221 242 192	13 9 4	/ 16 10 6 /	13 9 4	-3 -1 -2	65% 83% 38%	147 148 145	20% 8% 44%	2 1 1	1 0 1	+1 +1 0
gustt1nha LOS	1.08 1.31 0.74	213 223 199	14 10 4	/ 16 8 8 /	6 4 2	-2 +2 -4	60% 58% 63%	158 165 147	22% 19% 27%	1 0 1	2 2 0	-1 -2 +1
CTC LOS	0.96 1.41 0.27	160 221 70	14 12 2	/ 15 8 7 /	8 3 5	-1 +4 -5	60% 75% 38%	115 158 49	38% 44% 22%	1 1 0	5 1 4	-4 0 -4
pleets LOS	0.66 0.45 0.98	167 158 182	10 5 5	/ 17 12 5 /	6 5 1	-7 -7 0	60% 67% 50%	128 122 138	14% 10% 21%	0 0 0	2 2 0	-2 -2 0
RND LOS	0.47 0.79 0.03	127 184 45	8 7 1	/ 17 9 8 /	2 2 0	-9 -2 -7	50% 75% 13%	86 121 34	21% 27% 9%	4 4 0	2 1 1	+2 +3 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

prince

LOS

1.16 1.23 1.06

221 242 192

13 9 4

/ 16 10 6 /

13 9 4

-3 -1 -2

65% 83% 38%

147 148 145

20% 8% 44%

2 1 1

1 0 1

+1 +1 0

gustt1nha

LOS

1.08 1.31 0.74

213 223 199

14 10 4

/ 16 8 8 /

6 4 2

-2 +2 -4

60% 58% 63%

158 165 147

22% 19% 27%

1 0 1

2 2 0

-1 -2 +1

CTC

LOS

0.96 1.41 0.27

160 221 70

14 12 2

/ 15 8 7 /

8 3 5

-1 +4 -5

60% 75% 38%

115 158 49

38% 44% 22%

1 1 0

5 1 4

-4 0 -4

pleets

LOS

0.66 0.45 0.98

167 158 182

10 5 5

/ 17 12 5 /

6 5 1

-7 -7 0

60% 67% 50%

128 122 138

14% 10% 21%

0 0 0

2 2 0

-2 -2 0

RND

LOS

0.47 0.79 0.03

127 184 45

8 7 1

/ 17 9 8 /

2 2 0

-9 -2 -7

50% 75% 13%

86 121 34

21% 27% 9%

4 4 0

2 1 1

+2 +3 -1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
bnj NIP	1.58 1.78 1.44	257 235 272	19 8 11	/ 8 1 7 /	3 1 2	+11 +7 +4	85% 100% 75%	165 141 181	17% 14% 18%	2 1 1	1 0 1	+1 +1 0
bezn1 NIP	1.26 1.57 1.06	208 230 195	16 7 9	/ 10 2 8 /	10 4 6	+6 +5 +1	80% 88% 75%	149 183 126	22% 28% 17%	0 0 0	1 0 1	-1 0 -1
cauanzin NIP	1.13 1.33 0.99	258 257 260	18 8 10	/ 13 4 9 /	1 1 0	+5 +4 +1	75% 88% 67%	167 165 169	31% 30% 31%	2 1 1	2 0 2	0 +1 -1
Jonn NIP	0.98 0.84 1.07	212 183 231	14 4 10	/ 13 4 9 /	3 1 2	+1 0 +1	75% 63% 83%	150 117 172	18% 8% 25%	2 2 0	3 2 1	-1 0 -1
xand NIP	0.93 1.34 0.66	222 286 180	14 8 6	/ 15 5 10 /	7 1 6	-1 +3 -4	80% 63% 92%	143 170 124	32% 33% 30%	6 2 4	1 0 1	+5 +2 +3

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

bnj

NIP

1.58 1.78 1.44

257 235 272

19 8 11

/ 8 1 7 /

3 1 2

+11 +7 +4

85% 100% 75%

165 141 181

17% 14% 18%

2 1 1

1 0 1

+1 +1 0

bezn1

NIP

1.26 1.57 1.06

208 230 195

16 7 9

/ 10 2 8 /

10 4 6

+6 +5 +1

80% 88% 75%

149 183 126

22% 28% 17%

0 0 0

1 0 1

-1 0 -1

cauanzin

NIP

1.13 1.33 0.99

258 257 260

18 8 10

/ 13 4 9 /

1 1 0

+5 +4 +1

75% 88% 67%

167 165 169

31% 30% 31%

2 1 1

2 0 2

0 +1 -1

Jonn

NIP

0.98 0.84 1.07

212 183 231

14 4 10

/ 13 4 9 /

3 1 2

+1 0 +1

75% 63% 83%

150 117 172

18% 8% 25%

2 2 0

3 2 1

-1 0 -1

xand

NIP

0.93 1.34 0.66

222 286 180

14 8 6

/ 15 5 10 /

7 1 6

-1 +3 -4

80% 63% 92%

143 170 124

32% 33% 30%

6 2 4

1 0 1

+5 +2 +3

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
gustt1nha LOS	1.52 0.97 1.27	247 268 225	37 24 13	/ 32 14 18 /	14 9 5	+5 +10 -5	74% 75% 74%	176 193 155	27% 25% 30%	2 0 2	4 2 2	-2 -2 0
prince LOS	1.29 1.09 1.20	242 251 234	34 20 14	/ 32 17 15 /	18 12 6	+2 +3 -1	70% 83% 53%	159 158 159	25% 18% 34%	3 1 2	5 1 4	-2 0 -2
CTC LOS	1.26 0.38 0.87	141 190 76	24 20 4	/ 33 16 17 /	18 6 12	-9 +4 -13	70% 83% 53%	98 132 56	29% 40% 8%	3 2 1	7 2 5	-4 0 -4
RND LOS	0.84 0.63 0.74	181 216 146	26 16 10	/ 37 20 17 /	8 6 2	-11 -4 -7	60% 71% 47%	129 140 115	18% 21% 16%	9 8 1	7 5 2	+2 +3 -1
pleets LOS	0.55 0.78 0.65	142 126 160	19 9 10	/ 33 20 13 /	15 11 4	-14 -11 -3	65% 71% 58%	100 92 110	17% 13% 23%	0 0 0	3 3 0	-3 -3 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

gustt1nha

LOS

1.52 0.97 1.27

247 268 225

37 24 13

/ 32 14 18 /

14 9 5

+5 +10 -5

74% 75% 74%

176 193 155

27% 25% 30%

2 0 2

4 2 2

-2 -2 0

prince

LOS

1.29 1.09 1.20

242 251 234

34 20 14

/ 32 17 15 /

18 12 6

+2 +3 -1

70% 83% 53%

159 158 159

25% 18% 34%

3 1 2

5 1 4

-2 0 -2

CTC

LOS

1.26 0.38 0.87

141 190 76

24 20 4

/ 33 16 17 /

18 6 12

-9 +4 -13

70% 83% 53%

98 132 56

29% 40% 8%

3 2 1

7 2 5

-4 0 -4

RND

LOS

0.84 0.63 0.74

181 216 146

26 16 10

/ 37 20 17 /

8 6 2

-11 -4 -7

60% 71% 47%

129 140 115

18% 21% 16%

9 8 1

7 5 2

+2 +3 -1

pleets

LOS

0.55 0.78 0.65

142 126 160

19 9 10

/ 33 20 13 /

15 11 4

-14 -11 -3

65% 71% 58%

100 92 110

17% 13% 23%

0 0 0

3 3 0

-3 -3 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
bnj NIP	1.88 1.08 1.43	243 275 216	41 22 19	/ 22 6 16 /	8 5 3	+19 +16 +3	77% 95% 63%	150 164 138	21% 25% 18%	2 1 1	2 0 2	0 +1 -1
cauanzin NIP	1.44 1.06 1.23	257 265 252	39 19 20	/ 27 11 16 /	8 5 3	+12 +8 +4	79% 89% 71%	165 171 161	27% 29% 25%	4 2 2	2 0 2	+2 +2 0
bezn1 NIP	1.10 1.03 1.06	196 174 213	32 14 18	/ 27 9 18 /	14 5 9	+5 +5 0	74% 79% 71%	131 126 135	24% 32% 20%	6 3 3	3 2 1	+3 +1 +2
xand NIP	1.10 0.91 0.99	232 252 218	32 16 16	/ 32 13 19 /	15 5 10	0 +3 -3	77% 68% 83%	155 166 146	29% 26% 31%	11 4 7	4 1 3	+7 +3 +4
Jonn NIP	0.74 0.67 0.70	163 164 157	23 10 13	/ 32 13 19 /	16 10 6	-9 -3 -6	63% 58% 67%	112 109 115	19% 16% 22%	3 3 0	6 3 3	-3 0 -3

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

bnj

NIP

1.88 1.08 1.43

243 275 216

41 22 19

/ 22 6 16 /

8 5 3

+19 +16 +3

77% 95% 63%

150 164 138

21% 25% 18%

2 1 1

2 0 2

0 +1 -1

cauanzin

NIP

1.44 1.06 1.23

257 265 252

39 19 20

/ 27 11 16 /

8 5 3

+12 +8 +4

79% 89% 71%

165 171 161

27% 29% 25%

4 2 2

2 0 2

+2 +2 0

bezn1

NIP

1.10 1.03 1.06

196 174 213

32 14 18

/ 27 9 18 /

14 5 9

+5 +5 0

74% 79% 71%

131 126 135

24% 32% 20%

6 3 3

3 2 1

+3 +1 +2

xand

NIP

1.10 0.91 0.99

232 252 218

32 16 16

/ 32 13 19 /

15 5 10

0 +3 -3

77% 68% 83%

155 166 146

29% 26% 31%

11 4 7

4 1 3

+7 +3 +4

Jonn

NIP

0.74 0.67 0.70

163 164 157

23 10 13

/ 32 13 19 /

16 10 6

-9 -3 -6

63% 58% 67%

112 109 115

19% 16% 22%

3 3 0

6 3 3

-3 0 -3

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
gustt1nha LOS	1.44 1.73 1.13	280 313 244	23 14 9	/ 16 6 10 /	8 5 3	+7 +8 -1	87% 92% 82%	192 221 161	31% 31% 32%	1 0 1	2 0 2	-1 0 -1
prince LOS	1.24 1.35 1.11	262 260 265	21 11 10	/ 16 7 9 /	5 3 2	+5 +4 +1	74% 83% 64%	169 168 170	29% 29% 29%	1 0 1	4 1 3	-3 -1 -2
RND LOS	0.97 0.89 1.06	234 248 219	18 9 9	/ 20 11 9 /	6 4 2	-2 -2 0	70% 67% 73%	166 160 173	17% 17% 18%	5 4 1	5 4 1	0 0 0
CTC LOS	0.80 1.10 0.47	121 159 81	10 8 2	/ 18 8 10 /	10 3 7	-8 0 -8	78% 92% 64%	84 105 60	19% 35% 0%	2 1 1	2 1 1	0 0 0
pleets LOS	0.64 0.64 0.63	117 95 143	9 4 5	/ 16 8 8 /	9 6 3	-7 -4 -3	70% 75% 64%	75 62 90	21% 18% 24%	0 0 0	1 1 0	-1 -1 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

gustt1nha

LOS

1.44 1.73 1.13

280 313 244

23 14 9

/ 16 6 10 /

8 5 3

+7 +8 -1

87% 92% 82%

192 221 161

31% 31% 32%

1 0 1

2 0 2

-1 0 -1

prince

LOS

1.24 1.35 1.11

262 260 265

21 11 10

/ 16 7 9 /

5 3 2

+5 +4 +1

74% 83% 64%

169 168 170

29% 29% 29%

1 0 1

4 1 3

-3 -1 -2

RND

LOS

0.97 0.89 1.06

234 248 219

18 9 9

/ 20 11 9 /

6 4 2

-2 -2 0

70% 67% 73%

166 160 173

17% 17% 18%

5 4 1

0 0 0

CTC

LOS

0.80 1.10 0.47

121 159 81

10 8 2

/ 18 8 10 /

10 3 7

-8 0 -8

78% 92% 64%

84 105 60

19% 35% 0%

2 1 1

0 0 0

pleets

LOS

0.64 0.64 0.63

117 95 143

9 4 5

/ 16 8 8 /

9 6 3

-7 -4 -3

70% 75% 64%

75 62 90

21% 18% 24%

0 0 0

1 1 0

-1 -1 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
cauanzin NIP	1.32 1.52 1.13	256 270 244	21 11 10	/ 14 7 7 /	7 4 3	+7 +4 +3	83% 91% 75%	164 175 154	23% 28% 19%	2 1 1	0 0 0	+2 +1 +1
bnj NIP	1.30 1.95 0.71	229 305 161	22 14 8	/ 14 5 9 /	5 4 1	+8 +9 -1	70% 91% 50%	136 181 96	25% 31% 17%	0 0 0	1 0 1	-1 0 -1
xand NIP	1.05 0.93 1.16	241 227 255	18 8 10	/ 17 8 9 /	8 4 4	+1 0 +1	74% 73% 75%	165 162 168	26% 21% 32%	5 2 3	3 1 2	+2 +1 +1
bezn1 NIP	0.89 0.76 1.01	184 132 232	16 7 9	/ 17 7 10 /	4 1 3	-1 0 -1	70% 73% 67%	115 84 143	25% 37% 21%	6 3 3	2 2 0	+4 +1 +3
Jonn NIP	0.46 0.67 0.27	114 150 82	9 6 3	/ 19 9 10 /	13 9 4	-10 -3 -7	52% 55% 50%	80 104 58	21% 25% 14%	1 1 0	3 1 2	-2 0 -2

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

cauanzin

NIP

1.32 1.52 1.13

256 270 244

21 11 10

/ 14 7 7 /

7 4 3

+7 +4 +3

83% 91% 75%

164 175 154

23% 28% 19%

2 1 1

0 0 0

+2 +1 +1

bnj

NIP

1.30 1.95 0.71

229 305 161

22 14 8

/ 14 5 9 /

5 4 1

+8 +9 -1

70% 91% 50%

136 181 96

25% 31% 17%

0 0 0

1 0 1

-1 0 -1

xand

NIP

1.05 0.93 1.16

241 227 255

18 8 10

/ 17 8 9 /

8 4 4

+1 0 +1

74% 73% 75%

165 162 168

26% 21% 32%

5 2 3

3 1 2

+2 +1 +1

bezn1

NIP

0.89 0.76 1.01

184 132 232

16 7 9

/ 17 7 10 /

4 1 3

-1 0 -1

70% 73% 67%

115 84 143

25% 37% 21%

6 3 3

2 2 0

+4 +1 +3

Jonn

NIP

0.46 0.67 0.27

114 150 82

9 6 3

/ 19 9 10 /

13 9 4

-10 -3 -7

52% 55% 50%

80 104 58

21% 25% 14%

1 1 0

3 1 2

-2 0 -2

trembolonaRage

-28

Frags

–

Obviamente torcendo pra NIP perder. Um time que tem xand merece a derrota, sempre.
E olha que o Jonn é uma das pessoas mais fodas do cenário, tanto in-game quanto fora, mas xand não dá.

Esse cara NUNCA vai ser bem sucedido, é a cara da derrota. Pesquisem a line da dexterity de CSGO em 2014. cold, felps, taco, xand...

Adivinhem quem dessa lista toda nunca ganhou porra nenhuma? sim, ele, xand. Até o TACO que tomava apavoro pros random lvl 20 da gc aqui no br ganhou dezenas de títulos e milhões de reais.

e o xand, cadê? com 30 anos e morando na casa dos pais ainda, sem UM mísero título.

Enquanto não mudar a postura prepotente e arrogante nunca vai ter minha torcida.

Ricci

✔

Frags

–

tilto

racs

Frags

–

Você me da sono

Philosopher_Stone

Frags

–

Depois que o xand amassou o seu ídolo por 2/3 do ano eu entendo você ficar assim!

trembolonaRage

-5

Frags

–

sim amigo, o grande xand com 0 títulos somando csgo e valorant kkkkkkkkk

werZy

Frags

–

Nem curto o xand tbm, mas me tira uma duvida, o que o mw ganhou de relevante?

#12

Dhals1m

Frags

–

Ué, primeiro Camp quem ganhou aqui no BR o Mw tava, além de ter sido MVP

#13

trembolonaRage

Frags

–

basta pesquisar

#17

Burrito_s2

Frags

–

First Strike é um bom exemplo

#10

Philosopher_Stone

-2

Frags

–

0 titulos:
https://www.vlr.gg/event/561/champions-tour-south-america-last-chance-qualifier

e +
https://www.vlr.gg/42186/gamelanders-blue-vs-furia-champions-tour-south-america-last-chance-qualifier-sf/?game=all&tab=overview

https://www.vlr.gg/31350/gamelanders-blue-vs-furia-champions-tour-brazil-stage-3-challengers-playoffs-uqf/?game=all&tab=overview

#19

Bog

Frags

–

ta perdido amigão uahsuahshausa desde qnd qualify eh título haushausahsuha mds ... começou a acompanhar ontem campeonatos ???

#20

Philosopher_Stone

-1

Frags

–

qualify pro champions nao e titulo nao, suave.

#21

trembolonaRage

-3

Frags

–

kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

da até dó do cara
nem respondi por isso
deve ser sub do xand

Iper

Frags

–

I think this might be the best match of the quarterfinals, hopefully is a good one

ThewZ

Frags

–

ez 4 nip

kwe

Frags

–

NIP 2 - 1 LOS

#11

Noyn

Frags

–

NIP 2-1 LOS

#14

spookmeister

Frags

–

i dont watch BR scene, but i tuned in for like 5 seconds and saw Jonn pop off
i believe in NIP

#16

kwe

Frags

–

John cauanzin and xand are actually cracked I was surprised honestly, especially cauanzin that man doesn't miss a flick

#15

Guelry

Frags

–

TREMBOLONARAGE CRY IS FREEE

#18

Jawa

Frags

–

eu curto a NiP, principalmente por conta do jonn, mas ver ele sem duelista me entristece...

#22

ElderPaez

Frags

–

Pois é, ele de robozinho não convenceu.

#23

Peteer

Frags

–

Cara, ele de duelista amassava, principalmente de jett

#24

ValdemieGC

Frags

–

Wrong thread