I think you’re seriously underestimating what Boaster actually brings to Fnatic and why so many in the scene — including pros, analysts, and coaches — rate him highly as an IGL.
First, Valorant IGLing isn’t just about mid-round calls — it’s about the entire system you set up before the game even starts. Boaster has been a key architect in Fnatic’s playbook for years, building deep, layered strategies that allow his team to adapt across metas. Fnatic didn’t become one of the most consistently dangerous international rosters by accident; their prep, utility protocols, and site exec variations are among the most studied in the pro scene.
Second, his adaptability is proven. Fnatic has shifted styles multiple times — from heavy default setups, to fast-hitting executes, to more lurk-heavy and reactive play — and Boaster has made those transitions work. That’s not “silver strats,” that’s keeping pace with a constantly evolving pro meta.
Third, intangibles matter. At the top level, maintaining mental resilience, team cohesion, and clear comms under pressure is as valuable as any flashy frag. Boaster’s energy and leadership keep Fnatic from tilting in tough series, and that’s exactly why they’ve been able to recover from bad maps and win big titles — including international trophies.
If Boaster were truly “holding Fnatic back,” you wouldn’t see them consistently at the top of EU, winning Masters, and making deep international runs. A “trash IGL” simply can’t sustain that level of success in a game this competitive.
If you want, I can break down a few actual Fnatic matches to show how Boaster’s calling has directly won them rounds and series. That might make the difference between the hype you’re seeing and the reality of his skill.