Gambit too ratty
Sentinels too Reckless
Vision Strikers peak valorant
valulrantefanboy [#3]VS lmao, don't overhype them too much. Yeah they are discipline , great set plays, executes but they have weaknesses too. Their aim-wise, gamesense are not top , also lack of experiences
their aim is good, their mid round calling is not good.
valulrantefanboy [#3]VS lmao, don't overhype them too much. Yeah they are discipline , great set plays, executes but they have weaknesses too. Their aim-wise, gamesense are not top , also lack of experiences
Good gracious EMEA overlords beat them or else people wouldve been saying 100t is better than whole of EU
hellaeleganceyeah [#5]their aim is good, their mid round calling is not good.
That because of their gamesense and lack of experience, they will struggle againts flexible and anti-strat teams
Mrityunjay [#6]Good gracious EMEA overlords beat them or else people wouldve been saying 100t is better than whole of EU
No, I think VS would've gone to the finals had they played any of the other 6 teams. Their bad start on Bind was the reason they lost to Gambit.
valulrantefanboy [#7]That because of their gamesense and lack of experience, they will struggle againts flexible and anti-strat teams
they are a too dependent on set plays so counter strats can just boom them. same for nuturn but they liked fast hits on their peak.
valulrantefanboy [#7]That because of their gamesense and lack of experience, they will struggle againts flexible and anti-strat teams
they literally have probably more experience than fnatic,acend or gambit