potential groups for champions

#56

Vortexy

Frags

–

bringing up "history and results" as you said yourself

still waiting for your answer to #45

#57

Mkin11

Frags

–

NA and EMEA are the best regions, then comes Korea as 3rd then latam as 4th. When doing the pools one must select a criteria for which to make the pools I choose berlin placements. Subejctive perspective is a term I used meant to depict the bias one can have if you dont select a concrete criteria.

#58

Vortexy

Frags

–

Problem is, your criteria isn't concrete. You seem to have some issue with responding to #45 too. When I said Vision Strikers destroyed Acend but you put Acend in a better pool than a team they lost to, you said that you were basing it off regions and the overall performance of each region. Yet for some reason you have teams from the same region scattered around in different groups which is contradicting your claim of taking "results of a region" as a whole.

#60

Mkin11

-1

Frags

–

Acend is in pool one beacuse they are EMEA seed 1. "you said that you were basing it off regions and the overall performance of each region. Yet for some reason you have teams from the same region scattered around in different groups which is contradicting your claim of taking "results of a region" as a whole." I already clarify to you that the criteria was Berlin placements, it was a poor choice of words to say results.

#63

Vortexy

Frags

–

OK. Criteria off Berlin placements, even though you brought up this taking region as a whole logic. But in that case why is Acend in a better pool than Vision Strikers? (even disregarding the fact that VS creamed them) Did they not both achieve the same results at Berlin if we are taking only Berlin placements as criteria?

#67

Mkin11

-1

Frags

–

placements in berlin
1st: Gambit ( berlin winner)
2nd: Envy ( NA )
3rd - 4th: 100t ( NA )
3rd- 4th : G2 ( EMEA )
5th-8th: VS ( KR)
5th-8th: Sentinels (NA)
5th-8th: Acend (EMEA)
5th-8th: Kru (LATAM)
9th-12th : Vivo Keyd ( BR)
9th-12th : CR ( JP)
9th-12th : SMB ( EMEA)
9th-12th : F4Q ( KR)
13th- 16th: Paper rex ( SEA)
13th- 16th: Zeta division ( JP )
13th- 16th: Havan liberty ( BR)
13th- 16th: Bren (SEA)

since the lcq teams must be 4th pool because they gained their ticket to champions outside of circuit points

pool 1 ( Berlin, NA 1, NA 2, EMEA 1) ACEND IS EMEA 1 BY CIRCUIT POINTS, SENTINELS IS NA1 , ENVY IS NA2
pool 2 ( KR, EMEA 2, LATAM, JP) ------- No NA 3 so it goes to next one available, you can change JP with BR 1 if you wish
pool 3 ( BR 1, SEA1, BR 2, SEA 2) ------- No EMEA 3, No KR 2, no JP 2
pool 4 ( LCQ)

#74

Vortexy

Frags

–

Still doesn’t answer my question.

If we ignore this nonsense ‘results as a region’ thing you brought up and only Berlin results as you said, (“I already clarify to you that the criteria was Berlin placements”) why are teams who performed the same at Berlin in different pools?