why the fuck is sinatra on jett LMFAOOOO
Icebox map beta, QoL improvements
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
253 185 | 17 6 11 | / 15 6 9 / | 5 1 4 | +2 0 +2 | 161 124 | 23% 19% 24% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
233 119 | 16 8 8 | / 13 5 8 / | 10 4 6 | +3 +3 0 | 148 75 | 24% 25% 22% | 2 0 2 | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
212 179 | 16 4 12 | / 15 5 10 / | 3 1 2 | +1 -1 +2 | 137 110 | 26% 33% 24% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
132 63 | 8 5 3 | / 18 7 11 / | 4 2 2 | -10 -2 -8 | 95 51 | 21% 28% 14% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |||
|
128 99 | 9 2 7 | / 17 7 10 / | 6 3 3 | -8 -5 -3 | 88 66 | 20% 0% 29% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
270 96 | 20 12 8 | / 9 5 4 / | 7 3 4 | +11 +7 +4 | 180 48 | 48% 45% 56% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
247 94 | 15 10 5 | / 17 10 7 / | 8 2 6 | -2 0 -2 | 174 63 | 22% 22% 22% | 3 2 1 | 5 1 4 | -2 +1 -3 | |||
|
230 90 | 17 10 7 | / 15 10 5 / | 3 2 1 | +2 0 +2 | 135 47 | 25% 32% 8% | 5 2 3 | 0 0 0 | +5 +2 +3 | |||
|
222 92 | 18 11 7 | / 12 7 5 / | 8 3 5 | +6 +4 +2 | 117 37 | 20% 22% 14% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |||
|
142 67 | 8 5 3 | / 13 9 4 / | 8 3 5 | -5 -4 -1 | 116 58 | 13% 15% 11% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
259 135 | 53 28 25 | / 51 25 26 / | 19 8 11 | +2 +3 -1 | 168 87 | 22% 23% 22% | 8 4 4 | 6 1 5 | +2 +3 -1 | |||
|
229 131 | 49 20 29 | / 52 28 24 / | 22 11 11 | -3 -8 +5 | 155 79 | 18% 18% 19% | 5 2 3 | 8 3 5 | -3 -1 -2 | |||
|
177 62 | 36 25 11 | / 49 22 27 / | 13 5 8 | -13 +3 -16 | 110 36 | 21% 24% 17% | 8 6 2 | 5 2 3 | +3 +4 -1 | |||
|
162 84 | 39 18 21 | / 42 22 20 / | 15 8 7 | -3 -4 +1 | 101 50 | 19% 17% 22% | 2 0 2 | 7 2 5 | -5 -2 -3 | |||
|
154 99 | 34 14 20 | / 46 23 23 / | 13 4 9 | -12 -9 -3 | 105 66 | 19% 15% 21% | 5 2 3 | 10 2 8 | -5 0 -5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
258 126 | 53 28 25 | / 51 26 25 / | 21 9 12 | +2 +2 0 | 176 85 | 18% 21% 15% | 13 5 8 | 12 3 9 | +1 +2 -1 | |||
|
230 131 | 58 28 30 | / 40 20 20 / | 17 5 12 | +18 +8 +10 | 151 90 | 21% 19% 23% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
209 119 | 46 22 24 | / 29 14 15 / | 36 13 23 | +17 +8 +9 | 137 68 | 33% 34% 31% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |||
|
192 113 | 42 21 21 | / 48 25 23 / | 14 6 8 | -6 -4 -2 | 108 59 | 19% 26% 14% | 11 5 6 | 7 2 5 | +4 +3 +1 | |||
|
192 100 | 41 21 20 | / 44 22 22 / | 18 9 9 | -3 -1 -2 | 138 70 | 17% 23% 13% | 6 5 1 | 7 3 4 | -1 +2 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
294 157 | 20 9 11 | / 18 11 7 / | 5 2 3 | +2 -2 +4 | 196 94 | 12% 18% 8% | 3 2 1 | 4 1 3 | -1 +1 -2 | |||
|
242 124 | 17 9 8 | / 17 9 8 / | 9 4 5 | 0 0 0 | 156 75 | 21% 30% 15% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
227 60 | 16 12 4 | / 15 7 8 / | 5 1 4 | +1 +5 -4 | 119 13 | 24% 26% 14% | 6 4 2 | 1 0 1 | +5 +4 +1 | |||
|
179 93 | 17 7 10 | / 11 7 4 / | 3 3 0 | +6 0 +6 | 102 41 | 16% 11% 25% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |||
|
130 41 | 8 7 1 | / 14 7 7 / | 7 2 5 | -6 0 -6 | 95 31 | 9% 11% 6% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
256 117 | 16 9 7 | / 18 8 10 / | 7 4 3 | -2 +1 -3 | 167 73 | 12% 24% 4% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
245 148 | 19 8 11 | / 14 6 8 / | 7 2 5 | +5 +2 +3 | 157 97 | 19% 23% 18% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |||
|
232 179 | 16 6 10 | / 18 8 10 / | 6 1 5 | -2 -2 0 | 123 87 | 14% 20% 13% | 6 3 3 | 6 2 4 | 0 +1 -1 | |||
|
162 96 | 13 8 5 | / 11 5 6 / | 15 2 13 | +2 +3 -1 | 90 46 | 22% 42% 12% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
150 104 | 11 3 8 | / 17 7 10 / | 2 2 0 | -6 -4 -2 | 113 74 | 17% 25% 14% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
282 103 | 19 13 6 | / 19 10 9 / | 5 3 2 | 0 +3 -3 | 186 65 | 23% 20% 29% | 5 3 2 | 4 1 3 | +1 +2 -1 | |||
|
266 134 | 20 9 11 | / 17 10 7 / | 11 6 5 | +3 -1 +4 | 175 76 | 27% 24% 32% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |||
|
172 62 | 12 8 4 | / 16 8 8 / | 4 2 2 | -4 0 -4 | 116 44 | 20% 19% 20% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |||
|
120 83 | 10 3 7 | / 17 11 6 / | 3 1 2 | -7 -8 +1 | 86 60 | 21% 13% 26% | 2 0 2 | 5 1 4 | -3 -1 -2 | |||
|
75 44 | 6 3 3 | / 18 10 8 / | 2 1 1 | -12 -7 -5 | 61 38 | 15% 9% 19% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
283 124 | 22 13 9 | / 14 6 8 / | 8 4 4 | +8 +7 +1 | 181 78 | 20% 29% 13% | 4 4 0 | 2 2 0 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
271 162 | 22 9 13 | / 16 8 8 / | 6 3 3 | +6 +1 +5 | 187 115 | 21% 18% 23% | 7 1 6 | 6 2 4 | +1 -1 +2 | |||
|
223 150 | 21 9 12 | / 14 7 7 / | 2 0 2 | +7 +2 +5 | 176 129 | 25% 13% 34% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
195 160 | 13 2 11 | / 9 4 5 / | 14 8 6 | +4 -2 +6 | 141 106 | 29% 11% 39% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |||
|
114 73 | 9 5 4 | / 15 7 8 / | 5 3 2 | -6 -2 -4 | 71 44 | 21% 19% 22% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
I mean they destroyed Dig, beat TSM as well as Sen and only lost to TSM when they played a very slow paced game especially compared to what we saw in the rematch and C9 who is a top 5 team and they lost 2-1. There's also plenty of vods to go off of, not as many as the other teams that have been around longer but still plenty such as the Dig game, TSM game, LG games, C9 games ect.
I wouldn't call this a fluke by any means, however this match wasn't for anything. Sentinels and 100T both already qualified for First Strike, so I don't think any of them really cared all that much, the same way Sentinels lost to GenG right after they qualified. Nonetheless I think it's safe to say at the moment 100T are 100% a Top 5 team, maybe Top 3.
100t, well you could see were playing very methodically. I mean look at the number of clutches they pulled off. Even when they were down 2 v 5 or 2v4, they went slow instead of trying to go for aims and inflict damage as much as possible. In bind, Hiko was alone vs 2 and the lineups and his amazing usage of the ultimate ensured that they won. Even on other maps i did see Hiko killing or inflicting max damage with his dart lineups and ultimates, so if 100t goes this rout and the 2 young aimers continue to improve their sense along with their aims. When the lans do arrive, i see 100t being a top 3-5 team easily considering their 3 players are more than accustomed to playing in large pressure scale tournaments.