https://x.com/EWC_EN/status/1901623422213321073
around 25 tier 1 teams are in EWC partnership programme. (talk is Each team gets "UP TO $1mil" in funding to expand their brand), a very good decision which adds financial stability to the relatively volatile eSports Future!!
Marc_ [#5]"flag lol" tf are you on about ?
you guys dont even care about human morality lol hence why i said flag
Marc_ [#5]"flag lol" tf are you on about ?
well it's not a million for every team, more like 500k for every single one, and it is a silent agreement that it goes towards expanding the org's disciplines, spoiler alert, the disciplines inside of ewc. do you think that you can buy a competent S-tier roster in a brand new game for 500k? I don't think so
Nef0r0 [#7]well it's not a million for every team, more like 500k for every single one, and it is a silent agreement that it goes towards expanding the org's disciplines, spoiler alert, the disciplines inside of ewc. do you think that you can buy a competent S-tier roster in a brand new game for 500k? I don't think so
something is better than nothing, but what do we know
Tacitus [#8]something is better than nothing, but what do we know
I mean you open a division, then you have to pay salaries and likely maintain this division for coming years. Legit being given a loan to gamble but then if you lose what you are given you have to pay it with your own money. Sustainable my ass
Nef0r0 [#9]I mean you open a division, then you have to pay salaries and likely maintain this division for coming years. Legit being given a loan to gamble but then if you lose what you are given you have to pay it with your own money. Sustainable my ass
what are the new games? do we have any idea?
Tacitus [#10]what are the new games? do we have any idea?
https://esportsworldcup.com/en scroll down and see all the games featured at ewc.
Nef0r0 [#11]https://esportsworldcup.com/en scroll down and see all the games featured at ewc.
are the partnered orgs compelled to have a roster in every game or is it optional?
Tacitus [#12]are the partnered orgs compelled to have a roster in every game or is it optional?
it is optional, cuz then you would need to pay like 30 million to own divisions in cs, dota, lol, tft, cod, ea fc, chess, and all the games. Basically only falcons can afford that (saudi run org), and guess who won the last club overall standings thru sheer number of their teams? Falcons.
Nef0r0 [#13]it is optional, cuz then you would need to pay like 30 million to own divisions in cs, dota, lol, tft, cod, ea fc, chess, and all the games. Basically only falcons can afford that (saudi run org), and guess who won the last club overall standings thru sheer number of their teams? Falcons.
I dont know man, cant understand the business model ewc is running
Tacitus [#14]I dont know man, cant understand the business model ewc is running
all the clubs participating in at least 1 game go towards the overall club standings. Each game has its own share of points which it gives for winning/placing top 2/top3-4/top8. It's kinda like F1 and their grand prix system, you can be the winner of 1 Grand Prix but then finish lower in the standings to someone who got 3 top 3s or 2 top 2s. The winner of the club standings is the one who gathered the most points across all the games.
Nef0r0 [#15]all the clubs participating in at least 1 game go towards the overall club standings. Each game has its own share of points which it gives for winning/placing top 2/top3-4/top8. It's kinda like F1 and their grand prix system, you can be the winner of 1 Grand Prix but then finish lower in the standings to someone who got 3 top 3s or 2 top 2s. The winner of the club standings is the one who gathered the most points across all the games.
so basically more rosters, more points
Tacitus [#16]so basically more rosters, more points
exactly, but in order to get more points you need to have Title contending rosters in most games
Nef0r0 [#18]exactly, but in order to get more points you need to have Title contending rosters in most games
true then 500k is less for topping the club standings
Tacitus [#19]true then 500k is less for topping the club standings
see the problem with this ''system''? pay 500k in order to pay even more for these new disciplines you get(debt from the loan) and see no massive win
Nef0r0 [#20]see the problem with this ''system''? pay 500k in order to pay even more for these new disciplines you get(debt from the loan) and see no massive win
basically debt trap
Nef0r0 [#22]I mean you might win some back, navi won like 600k back
there are always some winners in a gamble
Nef0r0 [#9]I mean you open a division, then you have to pay salaries and likely maintain this division for coming years. Legit being given a loan to gamble but then if you lose what you are given you have to pay it with your own money. Sustainable my ass
You have to pay back loans
Nef0r0 [#7]well it's not a million for every team, more like 500k for every single one, and it is a silent agreement that it goes towards expanding the org's disciplines, spoiler alert, the disciplines inside of ewc. do you think that you can buy a competent S-tier roster in a brand new game for 500k? I don't think so
Guy thinks he knows more ball than actual org owners
Liwus [#27]You have to pay back loans
it is an example, the loan is figurative, obviosuly you don't pay it back to ewc, but you still have to pay more than what you are given
Raycist [#28]Guy thinks he knows more ball than actual org owners
the only free cheese is in the mousepad
Discord