Fuck this valorant esports are completely based on luck. we need a real game
delighted [#2]This has always been the fucking case dumbass
That's why APAC won a trophy in 2024.
That's why APAC won a trophy in 2024.
www
delighted [#2]This has always been the fucking case dumbass
That's why APAC won a trophy in 2024.
agree. sentinels did that twice becuase of luck. also fnatic,nrg,acend,loud ...
recandexvous [#7]agree. sentinels did that twice becuase of luck. also fnatic,nrg,acend,loud ...
SEN beat GEN.G wtf are u on about bro. Stfu until u can find an actually good argument.
delighted [#9]SEN beat GEN.G wtf are u on about bro. Stfu until u can find an actually good argument.
theres no way this isnt a bait account
delighted [#9]SEN beat GEN.G wtf are u on about bro. Stfu until u can find an actually good argument.
bro got baited
delighted [#9]SEN beat GEN.G wtf are u on about bro. Stfu until u can find an actually good argument.
That doesnt change anything lol. they beat geng because of luck. its one of the luckiest run i ever seen. also geng is mid
CactusPlant [#10]theres no way this isnt a bait account
stfu DRShit fan, all of u won't accept that ur region is SHIT
recandexvous [#12]That doesnt change anything lol. they beat geng because of luck. its one of the luckiest run i ever seen. also geng is mid
Solo and hsk made this team good. Munchkin shouldn't be fragging out this much lmao. Flukiest year of Valorant eSports ever.
delighted [#2]This has always been the fucking case dumbass
That's why APAC won a trophy in 2024.
Yeah, they got lucky to face trash Heretics in the grand finals.
svln_the_fourth [#8]chess
It feels like there's no point playing for me because the engines are so much stronger than human.
Melloaw [#17]It feels like there's no point playing for me because the engines are so much stronger than human.
ur not playing engines bro, its like saying I don't want to get good at math because calculators exist
delighted [#2]This has always been the fucking case dumbass
That's why APAC won a trophy in 2024.
how much did u bet
Langacune [#18]ur not playing engines bro, its like saying I don't want to get good at math because calculators exist
Math is about to know "Wish formula I have to apply in that context", things that calculators dont
Anguibok [#20]Math is about to know "Wish formula I have to apply in that context", things that calculators dont
Its a simple analogy, doesn't have to be totally correct
Langacune [#21]Its a simple analogy, doesn't have to be totally correct
The reason why your analogy doesn't work, is, to me, the reason why your reasoning is false ^^. If bot can do better than us, why shall we do it ? ^^
Anguibok [#22]The reason why your analogy doesn't work, is, to me, the reason why your reasoning is false ^^. If bot can do better than us, why shall we do it ? ^^
So if you have calculators why would you learn how to calculate? What are you saying
Langacune [#24]So if you have calculators why would you learn how to calculate? What are you saying
Because calculator doesnt tell you wish formula would you apply. Today i almost always use calculator when it's possible, but the real challenge is to pick the good formula to put in the calculator
Anguibok [#25]Because calculator doesnt tell you wish formula would you apply. Today i almost always use calculator when it's possible, but the real challenge is to pick the good formula to put in the calculator
You understand that calcuting is a thing in chess right? And analogys are not 1:1 examples right? So when I say "lets not play chess because computers calculate moves better is similar to lets not learn how to calculate because calculators exist" thats an analogy right? If you think the analogy has to have every single dynamic with the main point the exact same you are stupid
Langacune [#26]You understand that calcuting is a thing in chess right? And analogys are not 1:1 examples right? So when I say "lets not play chess because computers calculate moves better is similar to lets not learn how to calculate because calculators exist" thats an analogy right? If you think the analogy has to have every single dynamic with the main point the exact same you are stupid
I'm saying the analogy doesnt work not that "it's not 1:1", nobody makes hard calculation anymore, and everybody uses calculator. If you say "look at this car flying as train" and I answer "Cars dont fly" you cant answer "It's not an analogy 1:1"
Anguibok [#27]I'm saying the analogy doesnt work not that "it's not 1:1", nobody makes hard calculation anymore, and everybody uses calculator. If you say "look at this car flying as train" and I answer "Cars dont fly" you cant answer "It's not an analogy 1:1"
Okay lets make it more similar then, do you think the existence of calculators take away from this competition of how impressive it is or how cool etc whatever is the enyjoyment people get out of this, its the same thing when magnus carlsen finds an incredible move and people enjoy watching that game or enjoy playing chess themself to have moments like that. The point of the analogy is that the machines don't take away anything from human to human competition