scrims do not matter please shut the frick up holy. teams practice retakes/site holds and multiple theory scenarios more than actual 5v5's. has it ever occurred to you maybe the matches don't end on 13 because they aren't playing to win or to 5v5 scrim? lets say SEN is getting whooped 5-17, from your eyes they are getting dogshit on and getting absolutely turned and everything but what if they are practicing retakes? a 30% win rate on retakes, thats actually insane. thats how most scrims go, please stop making yourselves look like fools. (mostly targeted towards twitter users, i swear twitter has to be a social experiment to see how dangerous unstable people can be)
2
its been 4 years of vct
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
not all scrims matter but scrims are also not completely useless as there are times when the results of scrims go hand in hand with the team's placement in tournaments.
GMB had good scrim win percentages in their run in Masters Berlin if I'm not mistaken.
2024 GENG before kickoff was winning almost every scrim and ended up winning the event.
NS had a run of good scrim results before/during ascension.
can't remember EMEA and AMER scrim results anymore but it's not "useless" and certainly do not warrant you to say "shut the frick up holy".
tldr for users with F tier in reading: scrim results are not the best way to predict teams but it is also not a useless thing.
people are just having overreaction, there is no need to feed them all the attention bruh
Discord