ZEKKEN
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.57 1.68 1.50 | 245 214 266 | 20 8 12 | / 9 3 6 / | 4 0 4 | +11 +5 +6 | 80% 88% 75% | 140 120 154 | 16% 11% 19% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.39 0.54 1.96 | 319 152 431 | 21 4 17 | / 15 6 9 / | 8 4 4 | +6 -2 +8 | 70% 50% 83% | 214 110 283 | 39% 24% 45% | 5 0 5 | 4 3 1 | +1 -3 +4 | |
|
1.37 1.80 1.09 | 268 345 217 | 19 9 10 | / 11 5 6 / | 5 3 2 | +8 +4 +4 | 85% 88% 83% | 167 203 143 | 31% 48% 19% | 4 3 1 | 3 1 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
1.14 1.43 0.95 | 186 244 148 | 12 6 6 | / 11 4 7 / | 13 8 5 | +1 +2 -1 | 90% 88% 92% | 121 157 98 | 24% 22% 26% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.83 1.10 0.64 | 100 125 84 | 9 5 4 | / 10 3 7 / | 8 2 6 | -1 +2 -3 | 75% 88% 67% | 73 84 66 | 10% 13% 8% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.99 1.12 0.78 | 218 236 191 | 15 9 6 | / 17 10 7 / | 4 3 1 | -2 -1 -1 | 50% 50% 50% | 147 164 121 | 43% 38% 56% | 3 3 0 | 1 0 1 | +2 +3 -1 | |
|
0.93 0.65 1.34 | 195 172 230 | 12 7 5 | / 15 10 5 / | 5 3 2 | -3 -3 0 | 65% 67% 63% | 149 135 170 | 24% 29% 19% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.80 0.95 0.58 | 161 174 143 | 11 7 4 | / 16 9 7 / | 6 4 2 | -5 -2 -3 | 65% 67% 63% | 100 107 89 | 28% 28% 29% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.59 0.96 0.04 | 131 182 57 | 9 8 1 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 2 2 | -7 -1 -6 | 55% 75% 25% | 96 119 60 | 20% 22% 14% | 1 1 0 | 4 3 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.51 0.36 0.74 | 142 135 154 | 8 4 4 | / 17 11 6 / | 5 5 0 | -9 -7 -2 | 60% 67% 50% | 100 108 88 | 13% 10% 20% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.54 1.05 1.27 | 197 239 165 | 32 18 14 | / 26 11 15 / | 22 13 9 | +6 +7 -1 | 78% 76% 80% | 133 157 113 | 17% 16% 19% | 0 0 0 | 4 0 4 | -4 0 -4 | |
|
0.91 1.38 1.17 | 284 230 321 | 42 16 26 | / 35 16 19 / | 14 7 7 | +7 0 +7 | 67% 57% 76% | 184 153 210 | 23% 16% 28% | 9 2 7 | 11 7 4 | -2 -5 +3 | |
|
1.24 1.05 1.13 | 238 268 206 | 38 19 19 | / 31 16 15 / | 13 8 5 | +7 +3 +4 | 80% 76% 84% | 151 167 138 | 28% 31% 25% | 6 4 2 | 6 2 4 | 0 +2 -2 | |
|
0.93 1.09 1.02 | 188 141 214 | 28 11 17 | / 28 12 16 / | 9 1 8 | 0 -1 +1 | 70% 67% 72% | 116 94 135 | 18% 15% 21% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.97 0.93 0.95 | 149 155 155 | 28 14 14 | / 28 12 16 / | 11 3 8 | 0 +2 -2 | 76% 81% 72% | 106 93 117 | 17% 18% 16% | 2 1 1 | 5 3 2 | -3 -2 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.18 0.95 1.07 | 192 196 180 | 31 16 15 | / 30 16 14 / | 16 10 6 | +1 0 +1 | 67% 60% 76% | 126 130 122 | 35% 33% 39% | 7 4 3 | 2 1 1 | +5 +3 +2 | |
|
1.18 0.90 1.05 | 221 241 216 | 39 22 17 | / 36 19 17 / | 9 7 2 | +3 +3 0 | 76% 84% 67% | 136 137 134 | 23% 22% 24% | 9 6 3 | 2 1 1 | +7 +5 +2 | |
|
0.78 1.05 0.90 | 187 183 190 | 24 13 11 | / 33 20 13 / | 19 11 8 | -9 -7 -2 | 74% 76% 71% | 142 146 138 | 20% 16% 26% | 4 2 2 | 5 3 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.96 0.62 0.80 | 160 167 162 | 27 17 10 | / 34 17 17 / | 9 6 3 | -7 0 -7 | 65% 76% 52% | 115 111 118 | 18% 19% 18% | 4 1 3 | 6 4 2 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.59 0.82 0.69 | 166 156 185 | 26 13 13 | / 35 20 15 / | 8 6 2 | -9 -7 -2 | 67% 76% 57% | 114 102 129 | 14% 8% 20% | 3 1 2 | 4 2 2 | -1 -1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.37 1.60 1.14 | 208 236 180 | 20 12 8 | / 15 7 8 / | 9 5 4 | +5 +5 0 | 69% 69% 69% | 142 158 127 | 14% 14% 14% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
1.04 0.88 1.19 | 197 174 221 | 19 9 10 | / 18 9 9 / | 3 1 2 | +1 0 +1 | 77% 77% 77% | 131 98 164 | 19% 19% 19% | 2 1 1 | 4 3 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.99 1.14 0.85 | 249 278 220 | 21 12 9 | / 20 10 10 / | 6 3 3 | +1 +2 -1 | 65% 62% 69% | 161 180 142 | 12% 14% 9% | 4 2 2 | 7 4 3 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.95 0.89 1.02 | 208 220 196 | 19 10 9 | / 20 11 9 / | 8 5 3 | -1 -1 0 | 77% 69% 85% | 139 145 133 | 26% 22% 32% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.60 0.47 0.72 | 130 95 167 | 8 3 5 | / 19 9 10 / | 5 1 4 | -11 -6 -5 | 62% 54% 69% | 98 78 117 | 20% 16% 22% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.24 1.39 1.10 | 281 303 261 | 28 15 13 | / 20 10 10 / | 3 3 0 | +8 +5 +3 | 85% 100% 69% | 164 165 162 | 21% 20% 23% | 8 6 2 | 2 1 1 | +6 +5 +1 | |
|
1.14 1.22 1.06 | 166 159 173 | 16 7 9 | / 13 6 7 / | 12 7 5 | +3 +1 +2 | 81% 69% 92% | 111 99 122 | 30% 28% 32% | 4 1 3 | 1 1 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.97 0.97 0.97 | 189 153 227 | 18 9 9 | / 18 8 10 / | 5 4 1 | 0 +1 -1 | 73% 77% 69% | 129 104 154 | 18% 16% 19% | 3 0 3 | 2 1 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.89 0.89 0.88 | 179 194 165 | 12 6 6 | / 18 10 8 / | 14 8 6 | -6 -4 -2 | 81% 85% 77% | 137 156 118 | 16% 8% 33% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.83 0.79 0.87 | 190 176 205 | 18 9 9 | / 18 9 9 / | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | 73% 85% 62% | 126 97 155 | 14% 6% 20% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
i've been an xset fan since joining the valorant competitive scene, but ive really started to dread watching them lately. i don't know what it is but they're new agent comps, plays and decisions are just hard to watch. i don't know, maybe its bc I'm a thwifo fanboy and zekken(his replacement) hasn't been doing well but xset used to be this fun, aggressive, smart, aim-cracked team that pulled off huge upsets against tsm and sentinels and all these great teams and always put up numbers and their matches were fun to watch and i could root for their players and they never made stupid decisions in agent comps(why purer on skye when zekken is a known to be good skye?). i just dk man, i love purer and bcj and ayrin, but xset really fell down the drain. i miss when they put up numbers vs v1 and tsm
teams need to realize that just bc a new team comp will catch the enemies off guard doesn't mean it will work. for example leaf on raze, sure he top fragged but he could've done much better on jett, which he's known to play. he went flying backwards with satchels, sometimes he popped raze ult and didn't even shoot it. sure he did well but he couldve done much better with jett. maybe with some more practice it could work but otherwise leaf on raze is not as good as leaf on jett. also purer on skye? why not have zekken, who is more than capable of playing skye, play skye? i think because nitr0 played jett and it worked NA teams think that switching your agent comps up is going to win you games. they are wrong. nitr0 on jett was a good idea because 1. he was an awper in CS, 2. asuna on jett was simply not working as well as asuna on other agents, and 3. nitr0 is just a very smart jett and his use of jett to create 1v1s is top tier