gc is a joke
Lyonix [#5]G2 are the best FEMALE team in Valorant, but GC allows non binary and trans players, unlucky
Registered: November 15, 2024
NioMS [#2]They are the best female team but it's not the women's division it's GC
yh idk why ppl blable so much, its not a females tournment
Lyonix [#5]G2 are the best FEMALE team in Valorant, but GC allows non binary and trans players, unlucky
Team liquid would clear them
NioMS [#2]They are the best female team but it's not the women's division it's GC
I think Liquid is the best female team.
Astar [#10]as a woman myself. its not that im transphobic or anything but this feels just unfair. if this keeps going its gonna be the meta for gc for years to come
that makes no sense G2 literally beat mibr to put mibr into lowers.
cozylotus [#14]that makes no sense G2 literally beat mibr to put mibr into lowers.
fair point. but cant say the same to SR who have been dominant, except the choke of the final last year
Lyonix [#5]G2 are the best FEMALE team in Valorant, but GC allows non binary and trans players, unlucky
ngl if GC was only women G2 would have won every champs lol
Astar [#10]as a woman myself. its not that im transphobic or anything but this feels just unfair. if this keeps going its gonna be the meta for gc for years to come
well this has happened on sports non binaries in women sports ...... why not e-sports no??
Astar [#15]fair point. but cant say the same to SR who have been dominant, except the choke of the final last year
G2 vs sr yesterday was 2 ots. That's not dominent. The discourse yesterday was gozen was closing the skill gap.
shaggyboy1030 [#18]well this has happened on sports non binaries in women sports ...... why not e-sports no??
well at least in olympics they tested the hormonal percentage in their body. riot doesnt do shit
Astar [#20]well at least in olympics they tested the hormonal percentage in their body. riot doesnt do shit
this is not a physical sport lol
Astar [#10]as a woman myself. its not that im transphobic or anything but this feels just unfair. if this keeps going its gonna be the meta for gc for years to come
There are no studies that show that biological males have any significant advantage over females.
marika_knows_the_end [#6]Registered: November 15, 2024
downvoted for pointing out an obvious fake/ban evader account only here to bait/hate lmao #WLR
Gre4t [#21]this is not a physical sport lol
its not about the physical. its about who pass the women category
NioMS [#2]They are the best female team but it's not the women's division it's GC
Team Liquid >>> G2
_Freeza_DBZ [#11]I think Liquid is the best female team.
Agreed.
bstrdd + co got robbed and nobody cared.
Docta [#22]There are no studies that show that biological males have any significant advantage over females.
Can you say that to me without lying your ass off?
charleser [#29]Can you say that to me without lying your ass off?
There are no studies that show that biological males have any significant advantage over females.
Mentosis [#8]yh idk why ppl blable so much, its not a females tournment
then make a female tournament .... why include women with transformers
Obsidian_Echo_Alt [#32]then make a female tournament .... why include women with transformers
"Game Changers is a program which will supplement the competitive season by creating new opportunities and exposure for women and other marginalized genders within VALORANT esports."
Docta [#31]There are no studies that show that biological males have any significant advantage over females.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00128/full
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022096500925943
https://blog.mindcrowd.org/reaction-time-as-a-measure-of-brain-health-mindcrowd-study-findings/
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40296069
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22390656/ https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0026141
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999374/
https://stanmed.stanford.edu/2017spring/how-mens-and-womens-brains-are-different.html
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284542074_Gender_and_Gaming_A_Literature_Review
kingop3n [#34]"Game Changers is a program which will supplement the competitive season by creating new opportunities and exposure for women and other marginalized genders within VALORANT esports."
They aint getting opportunity in the main vct teams
Astar [#10]as a woman myself. its not that im transphobic or anything but this feels just unfair. if this keeps going its gonna be the meta for gc for years to come
"as a woman myself"
charleser [#35]https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00128/full
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022096500925943
https://blog.mindcrowd.org/reaction-time-as-a-measure-of-brain-health-mindcrowd-study-findings/
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40296069
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22390656/ https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0026141
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5999374/
https://stanmed.stanford.edu/2017spring/how-mens-and-womens-brains-are-different.html
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284542074_Gender_and_Gaming_A_Literature_Review
First resource published in 1995 without an actual study
I don't understand how large scale spatial processing is the difference maker. I wouldn't consider a valorant map large-scale nor are either of the IGL's identified males at birth so this is irrelevant.
Comparing by averages is stupid. That's like saying the average income of americans being around 58k is more representative of the actual population rather than the median income which is around 38k and is more representative of where the whole population scales to. It is impossible to know whether or not the overall set of women had lower scores than the men or whether the study purposefully misrepresented itself because there was a few women who had significantly lower scores and the men had rather average scores.
Idk why you think a study comparing 14 year olds where more of the women are younger is a strong source especially when published almost a decade ago on once again something that is irrelevant to the conversation.
Again, averages, but also... only 35 milliseconds...? If that was significant enough, no woman would be above immortal but clearly that's not the truth.
you did not read this article + its 16 years old
Over a decade old + no study
study of 30 people
This study implies that women can perceive and react faster than men and that is definitely not what you're arguing.
This magazine article implies that women would be logically better at the game and have stronger strategy and coordination. I am sure you have watched champs.
You DEFINITELY didn't read this. 2013
marika_knows_the_end [#23]downvoted for pointing out an obvious fake/ban evader account only here to bait/hate lmao #WLR
Whola Lotta Red? Carti is that u?