https://www.vlr.gg/378669/team-vitality-vs-trace-esports-valorant-champions-2024-opening-c
https://www.vlr.gg/247094/nrg-esports-vs-bilibili-gaming-valorant-champions-2023-group-stage-opening-c
why do China only upset in group C?
Diebs [#2]you would only have 2 nickels because blg beat nrg twice
vitality vs trace isn't even close to an upset, only a ignorant eu fan who doesn't watch cn would consider this an upset
not saying TE is mid or anything, they are great but EMEA playoff VIT was really good too. Sayf looked like he took 8 shots of steroids, so people saying VIT would win wasn't wrong.
yellow_donkey [#4]not saying TE is mid or anything, they are great but EMEA playoff VIT was really good too. Sayf looked like he took 8 shots of steroids, so people saying VIT would win wasn't wrong.
vitality is only good when trexx and sayf are both online
today only trexx showed up and they got exposed
Diebs [#2]you would only have 2 nickels because blg beat nrg twice
vitality vs trace isn't even close to an upset, only a ignorant eu fan who doesn't watch cn would consider this an upset
it's an upset lol, #3 (a new region) beating #2 (developed region) but cope harder
Diebs [#5]vitality is only good when trexx and sayf are both online
today only trexx showed up and they got exposed
When we compare teams and see which result will be an upset, we look at their form in their regionals and tbh VIT looked good vs TH and ultimately lost to FNC. TE had a good run too and people rated Kai and FengF highly BUT comparing the two team's run and VIT being #2, this result is an upset.
VIT is known to be inconsistent but saying trexx and sayf are the only people that can bring VIT to win is not very true. Runner was really important in their run in the playoffs and 'xx and yy HAS to be online to win'' can be applied to all teams