so boring sen always win.............
0
sen boring
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
ballistA [#4]sen doesn't win / currently lose = sen trash, NA 1 team,
sen wins = "boring" "lucky"
the copium is real
Nah it's not like that
they're a very good team but it's boring to just see sen win always
Split was a good game tho
nohorror27 [#5]Nah it's not like that
they're a very good team but it's boring to just see sen win always
Split was a good game tho
winning never gets boring
nohorror27 [#5]Nah it's not like that
they're a very good team but it's boring to just see sen win always
Split was a good game tho
what do u mean by winning gets boring? dont be delusional. if other teams want to win they should step up their play :)
nohorror27 [#5]Nah it's not like that
they're a very good team but it's boring to just see sen win always
Split was a good game tho
Trust me it's not their fault the matches are boring lmao
ballistA [#4]sen doesn't win / currently lose = sen trash, NA 1 team,
sen wins = "boring" "lucky"
the copium is real
It's the same as the Astralis era, or fnatic era on cs. Was boring to watch, but fantastic to witness a team so dominant. Was great for the game, but not he best viewing experience because you already know the outcome.
Raevus [#10]It's the same as the Astralis era, or fnatic era on cs. Was boring to watch, but fantastic to witness a team so dominant. Was great for the game, but not he best viewing experience because you already know the outcome.
too early to call it Sen era, if you're talking about NA then 100% but internationally to be called an ERA sen needs to win berlin and Champions to be compared to Astralis or fnatic
Emixx [#11]too early to call it Sen era, if you're talking about NA then 100% but internationally to be called an ERA sen needs to win berlin and Champions to be compared to Astralis or fnatic
ofc, I agree. Right now it's just the same in the sense of no matter who they play, they'll most likely win. They're by far the most consistent team in the world. They dont have a dynasty yet, as that's most likely a year + of winning large events. Just right now, they're not the most fun team to watch, as we know the outcome.
I just used the other cs teams as comparison, so someone doesn't think it's a general EU vs NA narrative, when it's just down to viewing experience.
It's also why people got bored of watching g2/penta in siege, when they were at their peak.
Raevus [#12]ofc, I agree. Right now it's just the same in the sense of no matter who they play, they'll most likely win. They're by far the most consistent team in the world. They dont have a dynasty yet, as that's most likely a year + of winning large events. Just right now, they're not the most fun team to watch, as we know the outcome.
I just used the other cs teams as comparison, so someone doesn't think it's a general EU vs NA narrative, when it's just down to viewing experience.
It's also why people got bored of watching g2/penta in siege, when they were at their peak.
oh ok my bad then i didn't get what u were saying at first, then yea i agree with you, as a sen fan it never gets boring to win but i get your point of view.
Emixx [#14]oh ok my bad then i didn't get what u were saying at first, then yea i agree with you, as a sen fan it never gets boring to win but i get your point of view.
Even if Sens wins both Master Berlim and Champions they wouldn't come close to the Astralis era. Astralis dominated for straight two years in the most competitive years of CS.
Sentinels are dominating in the first competitive year of Valorant, and they are mainly ex CS pros who are winning from teams with lower experience in tactical games.
If they dominate the next year then we can call it an Era.
Discord