4 NA
5 EMEA
2 BR
2 KR
2 JP
3 SEA
1 LATAM
1 OCE
1 MENA
2 CHINA
1 SOUTH ASIA
MilanTheMyth [#5]EMEA-4
NA-3
BR-2
JP-2
KR-2
LATAM-2
SEA-2
CH-2
SA-2
OCE-2
MENA-1
Thoughts?
good representation opportunities.
shyftnot [#3]if we get at least a team from every 1 of these region, my distributions:
4 NA
5 EMEA
3 KR
2 BR
2 JP
2 LATAM
1 OCE
1 MENA
4 APAC (CHINA+SEA)
I would merge KR and JP and give them 4 spots because I don't think with JP performances they are worthy of having 2 spots to themselves. Maybe give the other spot to EMEA considering how big the pool of teams are or another region that hasn't been able to prove themselves yet.
shyftnot [#3]if we get at least a team from every 1 of these region, my distributions:
4 NA
5 EMEA
3 KR
2 BR
2 JP
2 LATAM
1 OCE
1 MENA
4 APAC (CHINA+SEA)
they wont merge APAC. riot isnt that dumb
EU/CIS/TR - 5
MENA - 1
APAC north - 4 (Offline challenger playoffs, like KR challengers)
APAC south - 4 (Offline challenger playoffs)
NA - 4
LATAM/BR - 5 (Offline challengers playoffs, like LATAM playoffs)
Region of winner of previous masters/champions - +1
Breakdown of subregions of the regions:
Ideally I'll want MENA to compete in EMEA playoffs and give EMEA 6 slots but idk how strong they are. I've tried to keep the distribution more or less proportional to the current distribution of slots to regions.