0

prize pool bad ?

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
oiiink

why madrid 500k but sh0nghai has 1m, literally twice the amount even tho theyre both just masters

#2
SAMPV6
-1
Frags
+

ch0na

#3
Asuna_Yuuki
-1
Frags
+

🐭 🐁

#4
oiiink
-1
Frags
+
Asuna_Yuuki [#3]

🐭 🐁

🤬

#5
Coures
5
Frags
+

12 teams compared to 8 teams

#6
oiiink
-2
Frags
+
Coures [#5]

12 teams compared to 8 teams

well then it shouldve been 750k 🤓

#7
number2_cNed_fan
13
Frags
+

its always been like this no?
champs > 2nd masters > 1st masters

#8
dort
-7
Frags
+

madrid = mickey mouse. hopefully that answers your question

#9
Conceit
1
Frags
+

It scales through the year, this is how it's always been. It's to build more hype for the later tournaments and generally the more competitive tournaments are later on, so it'd be harder to win, so it makes sense to give more money

#10
Potatobrawler8
1
Frags
+

more teams, longer prep, better strats thus higher stakes thus higher prize pool

#11
lelouch526
-1
Frags
+

madrid = fluke
only 8 team less competition

#12
TM06Nick
0
Frags
+

Why would there be an issue with a larger prize pool for a tournament with more teams?

#13
tungsten_cube
0
Frags
+

masters 2 has always had a higher prize pool than masters 1 right?

#14
Asunas_Chinese_Teacher
0
Frags
+
dort [#8]

madrid = mickey mouse. hopefully that answers your question

downvote farming material

#15
mommymiIk
0
Frags
+
tungsten_cube [#13]

masters 2 has always had a higher prize pool than masters 1 right?

reykjavik 22 and copenhagen had 650k

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment