Unfair

I think one team getting to pick 2 maps is just straightaway unfair.

lets consider rise vs sen. Sen gets to pick 2 maps, rise gets to pick one.
Sen only wins on their own pick. Dont you think it was a little unfair to Rise?

I'm not a fan of Rise or Sen but really wanted your opinion on this.

(Ik that its highly likely that sen would have won even if rise got to pick 2 maps but who knows what would've happened. maybe rise could have defeated sen)

PS: my english is bad (more like horrible) but i tried to express myself. forgive any grammar mistakes

rise could have gotten 2 map picks if they were better and got a better seed but no
being good has it privilges

If you don't have map pick you have starting side pick right?

it's balanced with odd maps but with even maps it's not balanced. Just gotta wait until next episode

First of all, before the match, the two teams send all the maps in order from one to six. The final map selection will be based on these orders. After the 2 banned and 2 selected maps, whichever of the remaining 2 maps is higher in these lists is automatically selected. So its not unfair.

so there should be absolutely no point to seeding anymore?