1

My Ranking for franchise. FEBRUARY 2024 (+March 3)

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
PINTO0

Matches February: NRG 2-0 FUR, C9 2-1 MIBR, T1 2-0 BLD, GEN 2-1 RRQ, ZETA 2-0 GES, LOUD 2-0 SEN, LEV 2-1 100T, TS 0-2 TLN, DRX 2-0 DFM, KRU 1-2 G2, GEN 1-2 PRX, BLD 1-2 GES, T1 2-1 ZETA, FUR 0-2 MIBR, SEN 2-1 100T, DFM 0-2 TS, DRX 2-0 TLN, FUT 0-2 TH, GIA 1-2 KC, GEN 2-1 RRQ, TLN 0-2 TS, ZETA 2-0 GES, NAVI 2-1 BBL, TL 2-0 KOI, VIT 2-0 M8, TS 1-2 GEN, ZETA 0-2 TS, TRA 2-0 TYL, GEN 2-0 ZETA, FPX 2-0 NOVA, TH 2-0 KC, FUT 2-1 GIA, JDG 0-2 TEC, DRG 2-0 AG, NAVI 2-0 TL, BLG 0-2 WOL, BBL 0-2 KOI, VIT 0-2 FNC, NRG 2-0 C9, LOUD 2-1 LEV, T1 0-2 PRX, TYL 0-2 NOVA, DRX 0-2 GEN, JDG 2-0 AG, G2 0-2 EG, TRA 1-2 FPX, PRX 1-3 GEN, TEC 1-2 DRG, VIT 2-1 M8, WOL 1-2 EDG, KC 2-1 FUT, TL 1-2 KOI, C9 0-2 MIBR, LEV 1-2 SEN, G2 2-0 KRU, TRA 2-0 NOVA, TEC 2-1 JDG, WOL 0-2 BLG, KC 2-0 VIT, KOI 0-2 VIT, KC 2-0 KOI, MIBR 0-2 SEN, G2 1-2 MIBR, SEN 1-2 G2, TRA 2-1 TEC, BLG 2-0 TEC, BLG 1-2 TRA, TH 2-0 NAVI, FNC 0-2 KC, FPX 2-0 DRG, EDG 2-0 TRA, TH 1-3 KC, FPX 1-3 EDG, EG 1-2 LOUD, NRG 1-2 SEN, LOUD 2-3 SEN
Ranking February:

  1. LOUD 3979,575 Pts +1005,387 (2718P) ↑2
  2. SEN 3561,521 Pts +2653,729 (3226,5P) ↑8
  3. GEN 3309,675 Pts +2837,935 (3125,45P) ↑19
  4. KC 2569,05 Pts +2192,056 (2406P) ↑21
  5. PRX 2421,15 Pts -709,65 (1007,25P) ↓3
  6. EG 2047,863 Pts -1338,33 (673,5P) ↓5
  7. EDG 1577,181 Pts -640,606 (776,25P) ↓2
  8. G2 1400,625 Pts +1359,375 (1380P) ↑24
  9. MIBR 1339 Pts +1154,313 (1339P) ↑21
  10. LEV 1324,125 Pts -118,188 (751,5P) ↓2
  11. TH 1251,675 Pts +1066,375 (1209,6P) ↑18
  12. FPX 1206 Pts +1206 (1206P) ↑23
  13. DRX 1153,833 Pts -409,759 (494,7P) ↓7
  14. NRG 1130,85 Pts +306,1417 (1026P) ↓2
  15. FNC 1082,55 Pts -1348,3 (204P) ↓11
  16. TS 1068,975 Pts +515,6 (859,35P) ↑2
  17. BLG 956,025 Pts -76,275 (439,875P) ↓8
  18. TRA 902,25 Pts +902,25 (902,25P) ↑17
  19. NAVI 826,8563 Pts +2,05156 (508,8P) ↓8
  20. C9 804,9916 Pts -647,617 (351P) ↓13
  21. VIT 802,65 Pts +407,9563 (679,2P) ↑2
  22. ZETA 778,9938 Pts +298,1063 (585,225P) ↓1
  23. KOI 753,125 Pts +200,9437 (523,2P) ↓4
  24. FUT 734,0375 Pts -55,3219 (456P) ↓10
  25. T1 728,55 Pts +241,7125 (568,65P) ↓5
  26. GIA 549,8625 Pts -177,985 (270P) ↓11
  27. TL 521,775 Pts -61,7281 (387,6P) ↓10
  28. WOL 499,5 Pts +499,5 (499,5P) ↑7
  29. 100T 499 Pts +118,625 (432P) ↓5
  30. KRU 444,675 Pts -376,238 (112,5P) ↓17
  31. RRQ 393,525 Pts +62,55 (267,75P) ↓5
  32. TEC 388,125 Pts +388,125 (388,125P) ↑3
  33. TLN 385,45 Pts +154,735 (298,35P) ↓6
  34. DRG 310,5 Pts +310,5 (310,5P) ↑1
  35. JDG 284,625 Pts +284,625 (284,625P) ↑0
  36. GES 258,85 Pts +36,35 (183,6P) ↓8
  37. BBL 200,025 Pts +23,225 (165,6P) ↓6
  38. BLD 178,1625 Pts +138,0375 (158,1P) ↓5
  39. M8 163,2 Pts +163,2 (163,2P) ↓4
  40. NOVA 155,25 Pts +155,25 (155,25P) ↓5
  41. FUR 124,375 Pts -465,125 (0P) ↓25
  42. DFM/AG/TYL 0 Pts +0 (0P) ↓7

Last Month
Rules
Any questions you have about the format, why a team is in a position, or any recommendations are welcome.

#2
south_america_best_region
0
Frags
+

W system

#3
PINTO0
0
Frags
+
south_america_best_region [#2]

W system

(WTF is that system)
(shit system)

#4
yessirsedi
0
Frags
+

allat

#5
Psion
-3
Frags
+

this is too much text lol. average vlr person will not read it
also the system is broken if g2 is eighth lol

#6
PINTO0
4
Frags
+
Psion [#5]

this is too much text lol. average vlr person will not read it
also the system is broken if g2 is eighth lol

IDC bro, you can just see the placements, if the average vlr person can't read it. isn't my problem

#7
Zerphyr1
0
Frags
+

100T is below Wolves. Aint no way.

Good start though

#8
Psion
-4
Frags
+
PINTO0 [#6]

IDC bro, you can just see the placements, if the average vlr person can't read it. isn't my problem

lol

#9
PINTO0
0
Frags
+
Zerphyr1 [#7]

100T is below Wolves. Aint no way.

Good start though

reason why Wolves>100T for the ranking:
Wolves won a match against BLG (top 10 last ranking)

#10
Zerphyr1
0
Frags
+
PINTO0 [#9]

reason why Wolves>100T for the ranking:
Wolves won a match against BLG (top 10 last ranking)

ik :C

#11
Psion
0
Frags
+
Zerphyr1 [#7]

100T is below Wolves. Aint no way.

Good start though

its a purely results based system with no eye test, so wolves should be below 100T. But a system with no eye test does not work lol

#12
PINTO0
0
Frags
+
Psion [#11]

its a purely results based system with no eye test, so wolves should be below 100T. But a system with no eye test does not work lol

if you can't win a match
it doesn't matter if you play better, you're a bad team

so isn't a bad system at all
just opinions can't be numbers
but numbers can be opinions

#13
Psion
0
Frags
+
PINTO0 [#12]

if you can't win a match
it doesn't matter if you play better, you're a bad team

so isn't a bad system at all
just opinions can't be numbers
but numbers can be opinions

you can't use a results based system off of such a small sample size.... it works over the course of an NBA or MLB season but not minimum 2 matches in val

#14
PINTO0
1
Frags
+
Psion [#13]

you can't use a results based system off of such a small sample size.... it works over the course of an NBA or MLB season but not minimum 2 matches in val

100T lost 6 matches (vs SEN, vs FUT, vs DRX, vs C9, vs LEV, vs SEN)
all count for the ranking

Wolves in 3 matches won against a top 10 ranking team
i mean bro too much difference

#15
Psion
1
Frags
+
PINTO0 [#14]

100T lost 6 matches (vs SEN, vs FUT, vs DRX, vs C9, vs LEV, vs SEN)
all count for the ranking

Wolves in 3 matches won against a top 10 ranking team
i mean bro too much difference

ah yes offseason matches where they have a sub matter so much (ps bilibili is not a top 10 team lmfao they aren't even top 4 in the weakest region)

#16
PINTO0
0
Frags
+
Psion [#15]

ah yes offseason matches where they have a sub matter so much (ps bilibili is not a top 10 team lmfao they aren't even top 4 in the weakest region)

click the "last month" link
there Bilibili was top 10
now they're N°17

#17
Psion
0
Frags
+
PINTO0 [#16]

click the "last month" link
there Bilibili was top 10
now they're N°17

all you are doing is proving my point lol. NOBODY said bilibili was a top 9 team itw in december. you need the eye test because of seperate leagues and small sample size

#18
PINTO0
0
Frags
+
Psion [#17]

all you are doing is proving my point lol. NOBODY said bilibili was a top 9 team itw in december. you need the eye test because of seperate leagues and small sample size

https://www.vlr.gg/event/1657/valorant-champions-2023
"not a top 9 team"
bro wtf are you saying
they were top 8 in Champs

#19
Psion
0
Frags
+
PINTO0 [#18]

https://www.vlr.gg/event/1657/valorant-champions-2023
"not a top 9 team"
bro wtf are you saying
they were top 8 in Champs

champions was in AUGUST. they beat a core that doesn't exist anymore and them going on A RUN was going 0-2 in playoffs
EG in december did not have a team and you had them 1st when they didn't have a 5 man roster

#20
PINTO0
0
Frags
+
Psion [#19]

champions was in AUGUST. they beat a core that doesn't exist anymore and them going on A RUN was going 0-2 in playoffs
EG in december did not have a team and you had them 1st when they didn't have a 5 man roster

i think you don't understand what a ranking means
the actual ranking is from JULY 2023 until today
the February matches are more important
but BLG/EG didn't play a Off-Season Match
so i can't lower points for that

#21
Psion
0
Frags
+
PINTO0 [#20]

i think you don't understand what a ranking means
the actual ranking is from JULY 2023 until today
the February matches are more important
but BLG/EG didn't play a Off-Season Match
so i can't lower points for that

i know you can't lower points because the system is bad. off season matches are off season matches and don't matter, every year is a new year and teams should not have similar rankings to last year unless they kept all 5 players. and even if your system only counted matches from this year it still wouldn't work because in statistics you need a minimum sample size of 30 matches and you have at most 7

#22
PINTO0
0
Frags
+
Psion [#21]

i know you can't lower points because the system is bad. off season matches are off season matches and don't matter, every year is a new year and teams should not have similar rankings to last year unless they kept all 5 players. and even if your system only counted matches from this year it still wouldn't work because in statistics you need a minimum sample size of 30 matches and you have at most 7

that's not the system problem
there will be teams that will play less than 30 matches
and it can't be restarted every year, cause some teams stay the same (FNC, EDG, PRX, DRX, LOUD, TS, BLG)
every team can make their changes, that's not the problem of the system, they have to stay at top for enough time to be the best (like LOUD)

#23
Psion
0
Frags
+
PINTO0 [#22]

that's not the system problem
there will be teams that will play less than 30 matches
and it can't be restarted every year, cause some teams stay the same (FNC, EDG, PRX, DRX, LOUD, TS, BLG)
every team can make their changes, that's not the problem of the system, they have to stay at top for enough time to be the best (like LOUD)

it literally is the system's problem. Look at how HLTV does it, events outside of 3 months ago barely matter to it and if you lose 3 of your 5 members you lose all of your points. this works in Counter strike because it is an open circuit system where teams play more than 30 games, but it cannot work in valorant

#24
Corny
0
Frags
+

ppl hate cause they don't understand the system.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I hate it.

#25
PINTO0
0
Frags
+
Corny [#24]

ppl hate cause they don't understand the system.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I hate it.

LMFAOOOO

#26
south_america_best_region
0
Frags
+

bump

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment