4

Wo0t should not play in Stage 2

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
MagicKid57

Now that Heretics have qualified for MAdrid there seems to be a blaring issue at hand. Does Team Heretics stick with a roster that qualified for an international event that includes PaTiTek or play with their offseason roster where wo0t is in place of PaTi. Now, it's likely that PaTiTek remains in the roster for Madrid as wo0t does not turn of age until 2 days into the event. But back to my original point I think that wo0t should remain on the bench until this roster proves to stagnate. I'm of the opinion that this roster has proven enough success to warrant it remaining in operation for the foreseeable future. In the span of nine days this roster has not dropped a map going 6-0 and beating the likes on NA'VI (who I deem to be a top 3 team in EMEA) and KC (which at the time of my writing is looking to dethrone Fnatic). This as compared to the roster with wo0t in who over the course of the offseason which went 3-6 in maps, 1-5 in matches with their only victory coming against G2 Gozen, and one of those losses coming against a middle of the pack Spanish Challengers team. It is by this logic that I think wo0t should become a 6th man until a time where the success of this roster with PaTiTek comes to an end. I don't think that the flow and roster chemistry of this team should be disrupted as they stay winning especially since the alternative is a C Tier roster at best, given their offseason performance. I am interested in your opinions because I want to know if anyone else is seeing this like me or has another viewpoint.

TLDR: The Team Heretics roster is looking better and more successful with PaTiTek so they should stick with him until the roster starts losing, leaving wo0t to the bench for the time being.

#2
BraindeadKJmain
-1
Frags
+

holy wall

#3
TheBigBoiPenguin
0
Frags
+

seperate the paragraph a bit buddy god damn

#4
Mapusaurus
2
Frags
+

Woot is one of the most talented players in emea tier 2, apparently with woot heretics did not lose any scrims.

#5
Mortadelo
1
Frags
+

Alright tho, have you watched Woot play in non offseason games? Because if not I'm sorry but judging off of the season makes absolutely no sense. Off season is not representation of shit

#6
Gutssz
0
Frags
+
Mortadelo [#5]

Alright tho, have you watched Woot play in non offseason games? Because if not I'm sorry but judging off of the season makes absolutely no sense. Off season is not representation of shit

probably there is a "he will play no matter what" clause in his contract

#7
Mortadelo
0
Frags
+
Gutssz [#6]

probably there is a "he will play no matter what" clause in his contract

Idk but even if there wasn't they definitely gonna play him. Probably not at madrid but at stage 2 1000%

#8
Gutssz
0
Frags
+
Mortadelo [#7]

Idk but even if there wasn't they definitely gonna play him. Probably not at madrid but at stage 2 1000%

some sources say so, there is no possibility of him not playing after 18

#9
Mortadelo
0
Frags
+
Gutssz [#8]

some sources say so, there is no possibility of him not playing after 18

I doubt you give a rookie that clause when many things can happen. maybe they have to pay him if he doesn't play or something. But not being able to bench him doesn't make sense

#10
Gutssz
0
Frags
+
Mortadelo [#9]

I doubt you give a rookie that clause when many things can happen. maybe they have to pay him if he doesn't play or something. But not being able to bench him doesn't make sense

that's what i heard

which is probably why he chose TH

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment