I was doubting it earlier but honestly idk now
Waited01 [#2]SEN had two close maps against LOUD, I don't understand why people were writing them off. LEV had a shaky game against 100T. SEN look more fluid.
Oh yeah, this is also including that LEV had time to anti-strat LOUD on both Split and Ascent, while SEN underperformed on Split and got suprised on Ascent.
anyth1ng [#6]tbh i think LEV LOUD SEN NRG are all kind of the same level rn
honestly RIP to the rest of the Americas teams because the gap between them and those 4 are crazy (MAYBE 100T)
anyth1ng [#6]tbh i think LEV LOUD SEN NRG are all kind of the same level rn
I agree with this take. I think what's actually scary though is if NRG is actually saving strats. If they are, then I'd put them above Loud, Sen and Lev.
TriQo [#9]Sentinels had a 7-5 lead first half against LOUD’s attack
they had the better read against a team comp they’ve never seen before
thats what im saying, even fns with map and everything revealed cant seem to find a hole in Louds ascent comp but sen actually gave them the push without any prior knowledge of the comp and with proper prep/anti strat they could potentially pick it apart
snowconedeity [#10]honestly RIP to the rest of the Americas teams because the gap between them and those 4 are crazy (MAYBE 100T)
it’s unfortunate only 2 teams quaify, especially in a stacked regions like americas